Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942012000600004
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Uso da máscara laríngea descartável em adenotonsilectomias

The use of disposable laryngeal mask airway for adenotonsillectomies

Dante Ranieri Junior; Adecir Geraldo Neubauer; Denise Marchi Ranieri; Paulo do Nascimento Junior

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942012000600004 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.62, n6, p.793-798, 2012
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 1020

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A intubação traqueal associada a operações das vias aéreas faz com que complicações como laringoespasmo, broncoespasmo e períodos de redução da saturação de oxigênio sejam frequentemente relatados em adenotonsilectomias, procedimento que, por sua natureza, eleva a incidência de tais complicações. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a ocorrência de problemas respiratórios comparando-se o uso da máscara laríngea (ML) descartável com a intubação orotraqueal em adenotonsilectomias. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 204 pacientes pediátricos submetidos a anestesia geral para adenotonsilectomias e alocados em dois grupos, aleatoriamente: grupo Cânula Traqueal (CT, n = 100) e grupo Máscara Laríngea (ML, n = 104). Foram observados os níveis de saturação de pulso de oxigênio (SpO2) após a indução anestésica (SpO2-1), após o estabelecimento de campo operatório (SpO2-2), ao término do procedimento cirúrgico (SpO2-3), três minutos após a retirada do dispositivo respiratório (SpO2-4) e na admissão da sala de recuperação anestésica (SpO2-5). As complicações respiratórias foram relatadas. RESULTADOS: Os valores médios e os desvios padrão de SpO2 nos grupos CT e ML foram, respectivamente: SpO2-1: 98,9 ± 1,0 e 98,7 ± 0,8 (p > 0,25); SpO2-2: 97,4 ± 1,0 e 94,9 ± 4,3 (p < 0,001); SpO2-3: 96,9 ± 1,1 e 97,2 ± 1,1 (p = 0,037); SpO2-4: 91,7 ± 9,0 e 95,2 ± 2,2 (p < 0,001); SpO2-5: 94,0 ± 2,1 e 95,8 ± 2,6 (p < 0,001). No grupo ML, em 12 pacientes, foi necessária alguma manobra para ajuste do dispositivo e correção de vazamento durante o ato operatório. A ML foi substituída pela CT em quatro pacientes. As complicações respiratórias foram similares entre os grupos. CONCLUSÕES: Adenotonsilectomias em pacientes pediátricos com o emprego da ML, em comparação com a CT, resulta em menores valores de SpO2 intraoperatórios e, eventualmente, necessidade de substituição da ML pela CT. Apesar de a ML viabilizar a cirurgia, pela segurança, o uso da CT é preferível.

Palavras-chave

CIRURGIA, Otorrinolaringológica, COMPLICAÇÕES, Intubação traqueal, Laringoespasmo, Broncoespasmo, Aspiração pulmonar, EQUIPAMENTOS, Tubo Traqueal, Máscara Laríngea

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tracheal intubation associated with airway operations can cause complications such as laryngospasm, bronchospasm and periods of reduced oxygen saturation. Such complications are frequently reported during adenotonsillectomies, a procedure that by nature increases the incidence of airway complications. The objective of this study was to compare the occurrence of respiratory problems during adenotonsillectomies while using either a disposable laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or an endotracheal tube (TT). METHODS: We evaluated 204 pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for adenotonsillectomies. The patients were randomly allocated into either the tracheal intubation group (TT, n = 100) or the laryngeal mask airway group (LMA, n = 104). It was measured the level of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) after the induction of anesthesia (SpO2-1), after establishing the operative field (SpO2-2), at the end of the surgical procedure (SpO2-3), three minutes after the removal of the contained breathing apparatus (SpO2-4) and upon admission to the post-anesthesia care unit (SpO2-5). All respiratory complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean SpO2 values and standard deviations for the TT and LMA groups were as follows: SpO2-1: 98.9 ± 1.0 and 98.7 ± 0.8 (p > 0.25), SpO2-2: 97.4 ± 1.0 and 94.9 ± 4.3 (p < 0.001), SpO2-3: 96.9 ± 1.1 and 97.2 ± 1.1 (p = 0.037), SpO2-4: 91.7 ± 9.0 and 95.2 ± 2.2 (p < 0.001) and SpO2-5: 94.0 ± 2.1 and 95.8 ± 2.6 (p < 0.001), respectively. In the LMA group, 12 patients required some maneuvering to fix positioning and leaks during surgery. In four patients, the LMA had to be replaced with a TT. Respiratory complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Performing adenotonsillectomies in pediatric patients using a LMA resulted in a lower intraoperative SpO2, compared to using a TT. In some cases, the LMA had to be replaced with an endotracheal tube. Although the surgery may be performed with LMA, the use of a TT is preferred for safety.

Keywords

Bronchial spasm, Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngeal Masks, Laryngismus, Otolaryngology, Respiratory Aspiration

References

Kretz FJ, Reimann B, Stelzner J. The laryngeal mask in pediatric adenotonsillectomy: A meta-analysis of medical studies. Anaesthesist. 2000;49:706-712.

Al-alami AA, Zestos MM, Baraka AS. Pediatric laryngospasm: prevention and treatment. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:388-395.

Williams PJ, Bailey PM. Comparison of the reinforced laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation for adenotonsillectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:30-33.

Jefferson N, Riffat F, McGuinness J. The laryngeal mask airway and otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1620-1626.

Nascimento Jr P, Neves LBJ, Modolo NS. Complicações respiratórias em crianças submetidas à anestesia geral. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2000;50:345-349.

Adewale L. Anatomy and assessment of the pediatric airway. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(^s1):1-8.

Webster AC, Morley-Forster PK, Dain S. Anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy: a comparison between tracheal intubation and the armoured laryngeal mask airway. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:1171-1177.

Lim NL. The use of the laryngeal mask airway in post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: a case report. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2000;29:764-765.

Boisson-Bertrand D. Modified laryngeal mask for adenotonsillectomy in children. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1993;12:82-83.

Splinter WM, Reid CW. Removal of the laryngeal mask airway in children: deep anesthesia versus awake. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:4-7.

Daum RE, O'Reilly BJ. The laryngeal mask airway in ENT surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1992;106:28-30.

Sanchez Gomez S, Garcia Iriarte MT, Abrante Jimenez A. Laryngeal mask anesthesia technique in adenoidectomy procedures with or without tonsillectomy. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1998;49:389-396.

Aziz L, Bashir K. Comparison of armoured laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube for adenotonsillectomy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006;16:685-688.

Yazbeck-Karam VG, Aouad MT, Baraka AS. Laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during diagnostic and interventional fibreoptic bronchoscopy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13:691-694.

Ismail-Zade IA, Vanner RG. Regurgitation and aspiration of gastric contents in a child during general anaesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway. Paediatr Anaesth. 1996;6:325-328.

Hern JD, Jayaraj SM, Sidhu VS. The laryngeal mask airway in tonsillectomy: the surgeon's perspective. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999;24:122-125.

Gravningsbraten R, Nicklasson B, Raeder J. Safety of laryngeal mask airway and short-stay practice in office-based adenotonsillectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:218-222.

5dd28dd50e88252f18c63493 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections