Efeito da utilização de 2 mg.kg-1 de lidocaína endovenosa na latência de duas doses diferentes de rocurônio e na resposta hemodinâmica à intubação traqueal

Gustavo Gameiro Vivancos; Jyrson Guilherme Klamt; Luís Vicente Garcia

doi:10.1590/S0034-70942011000100001

Scientific Article

Efeito da utilização de 2 mg.kg-1 de lidocaína endovenosa na latência de duas doses diferentes de rocurônio e na resposta hemodinâmica à intubação traqueal

Effects of 2 mg.kg-1 of intravenous lidocaine on the latency of two different doses of rocuronium and on the hemodynamic response of orotracheal intubation

Gustavo Gameiro Vivancos; Jyrson Guilherme Klamt; Luís Vicente Garcia

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942011000100001 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.61, n1, p.6-12, 2011

PDF

Downloads: 0

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A lidocaína potencializa o efeito dos bloqueadores neuromusculares e atenua a resposta hemodinâmica à intubação. O objetivo do presente estudo foi testar o efeito da lidocaína sobre a latência de duas doses diferentes do rocurônio e sobre a resposta hemodinâmica à intubação orotraqueal (IOT). MÉTODO: 80 pacientes foram distribuídos em quatro grupos: os dos Grupos 1 e 2 receberam 0,6 mg.kg-1 de rocurônio, sendo que os do Grupo 2 receberam também 2 mg.kg-1 de lidocaína antes da indução; os dos Grupos 3 e 4 receberam 1,2 mg.kg-1 de rocurônio, sendo que os do Grupo 4 receberam 2 mg.kg-1 de lidocaína. A latência do bloqueio neuromuscular foi medida por meio da aceleromiografia. A avaliação hemodinâmica foi feita no momento basal, imediatamente antes e um minuto depois da IOT. RESULTADOS: Não se encontrou diferença estatística significativa entre a latência do rocurônio nas doses de 0,6 mg.kg-1 e 1,2 mg.kg-1 nos pacientes que receberam ou não a lidocaína antes da indução. A latência dos pacientes que receberam rocurônio 0,6 mg.kg-1 com lidocaína foi estatisticamente igual à dos pacientes que receberam 1,2 mg.kg-1de rocurônio, independentemente da administração ou não de lidocaína. Os pacientes que não receberam lidocaína antes da indução apresentaram aumento dos valores de pressão arterial sistólica, diastólica e média e da frequência cardíaca após a IOT, o que não ocorreu nos que receberam lidocaína. CONCLUSÕES: Assim, a lidocaína por via venosa antes da indução anestésica foi capaz de atenuar a resposta hemodinâmica associada às manobras de IOT, mas não de diminuir a latência do bloqueio neuromuscular produzido por duas doses diferentes de rocurônio.

Palavras-chave

ANESTESICO, Local, INTUBAÇÃO TRAQUEAL, FISIOLOGIA, Transmissão neuromusculares, TÉCNICAS DE MEDIÇÃO

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lidocaine potentiates the effects of neuromuscular blockers and attenuates the hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. The objective of the present study was to test the effects of lidocaine on the latency of two different doses of rocuronium and on the hemodynamic response to intubation. METHODS: Eighty patients were distributed in 4 groups: Groups 1 and 2 received 0.6 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium; patients in Group 2 also received 2 mg.kg-1 of lidocaine before intubation. Patients in Groups 3 and 4 received 1.2 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium; patients in Group 4 received additional 2 mg.kg-1 of lidocaine. The latency of the neuromuscular blockade was measured by acceleromyography. Hemodynamic evaluation was performed at baseline, immediately before, and 1 minute after orotracheal intubation (OI). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were not observed between the latency from 0.6 mg.kg-1 and 1.2 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium in patients who received lidocaine before induction and those who did not. The latency in patients who received 0.6 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium with lidocaine was statistically similar to that of those who received 1.2 mg.kg-1 rocuronium independently of whether lidocaine was administered or not. Patients who did not receive lidocaine before induction showed the same increases in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure and heart rate after OI, which was not observed in those patients who received lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous lidocaine before anesthetic induction was capable of attenuating the hemodynamic response associated to OI maneuvers, but it did not reduce the latency of the neuromuscular blockade produced by two different doses of rocuronium.

Keywords

Lidocaine, Neuromuscular Blockade, Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents, Intubation, Intratracheal

References

Yorukoglu D, Asik Y, Okten F. Rocuronium combined with i.v. lidocaine for rapid tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47:583-587.

Durrani M, Barwise JA, Johnson RF. Intravenous chloroprocaine attenuates hemodynamic changes associated with direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1208-1212.

Yukioka H, Hayashi M, Terai T. Intravenous lidocaine as a suppressant of coughing during tracheal intubation in elderly patients. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:309-312.

Woods AW, Grant S, Harten J. Tracheal intubating conditions after induction with propofol, remifentanil and lignocaine. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998;15:714-718.

Kindler CH, Schumacher PG, Schneider MC. Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: a double-blind, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:491-496.

Min JH, Chai HS, Kim YH. Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction: remifentanil vs. lidocaine with esmolol. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010;76:188-192.

Fujii Y, Saitoh Y, Takahashi S. Diltiazem-lidocaine combination for the attenuation of cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:933-937.

Aouad MT, Sayyid SS, Zalaket MI. Intravenous lidocaine as adjuvant to sevoflurane anesthesia for endotracheal intubation in children. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1325-1327.

Edwards ND, Alford AM, Dobson PM. Myocardial ischaemia during tracheal intubation and extubation. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73:537-539.

Adamzik M, Groeben H, Farahani R. Intravenous lidocaine after tracheal intubation mitigates bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:168-172.

Swanton BJ, Iohom G, Wang JH. The effect of lidocaine on neutrophil respiratory burst during induction of general anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18:524-529.

Groeben H, Silvanus MT, Beste M. Combined intravenous lidocaine and inhaled salbutamol protect against bronchial hyperreactivity more effectively than lidocaine or salbutamol alone. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:862-868.

Cui W, Li Y, Li S. Systemic administration of lidocaine reduces morphine requirements and postoperative pain of patients undergoing thoracic surgery after propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:41-46.

Lauwick S, Kim do J, Michelagnoli G. Intraoperative infusion of lidocaine reduces postoperative fentanyl requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:754-760.

Beloeil H, Mazoit JX. Effet des anesthesiques locaux sur la reponse inflammatoire postoperatoire. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009;28:231-237.

Cassuto J, Sinclair R, Bonderovic M. Anti-inflammatory properties of local anesthetics and their present and potential clinical implications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:265-282.

McKay A, Gottschalk A, Ploppa A. Systemic lidocaine decreased the perioperative opioid analgesic requirements but failed to reduce discharge time after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1805-1808.

Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schonherr ME. Systemic lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:192-200.

Cardoso LS, Martins CR, Tardelli MA. Effects of intravenous lidocaine on the pharmacodynamics of rocuronium. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2005;55:371-380.

Nonaka A, Sugawara T, Suzuki S. [Pretreatment with lidocaine accelerates onset of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade]. Masui. 2002;51:880-883.

Suzuki T, Mizutani H, Ishikawa K. Epidurally administered mepivacaine delays recovery of train-of-four ratio from vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:721-725.

Wang H, Zhang Y, Li ST. The effect of local anesthetics on the inhibition of adult muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;630:29-33.

Matsuo S, Rao DB, Chaudry I. Interaction of muscle relaxants and local anesthetics at the neuromuscular junction. Anesth Analg. 1978;57:580-587.

Braga Ade F, Carvalho VH, Braga FS. Influence of local anesthetics on the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium: effects of lidocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine on the neuromuscular junction. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009;59:725-734.

Larsen PB, Hansen EG, Jacobsen LS. Intubation conditions after rocuronium or succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction with alfentanil and propofol in the emergency patient. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:748-753.

Perry JJ, Lee JS, Sillberg VA. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008.

Doig GS, Simpson F. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care. 2005;20:187-191.

Hamaya Y, Dohi S. Differences in cardiovascular response to airway stimulation at different sites and blockade of the responses by lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:95-103.

Maddineni VR, McCoy EP, Mirakur RK. Onset and duration of action and hemodynamic effects of rocuronium bromide under balanced and volatile anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1994;45:41-47.

Grant S, Noble S, Woods A. Assessment of intubating conditions in adults after induction with propofol and varying doses of remifentanil. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:540-543.

Stevens JB, Wheatley L. Tracheal intubation in ambulatory surgery patients: using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:45-49.

Lauretti GR. Mechanisms of analgesia of intravenous lidocaine. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2008;58:280-286.

Koppert W, Ostermeier N, Sittl R. Low-dose lidocaine reduces secondary hyperalgesia by a central mode of action. Pain. 2000;85:217-224.

MacDougall LM, Hethey JA, Livingston A. Antinociceptive, cardiopulmonary, and sedative effects of five intravenous infusion rates of lidocaine in conscious dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009;36:512-522.

Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789-808.

El-Orbany M, Connolly LA, Connolly . Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation: Current Controversy. . .

Sparr HJ. Choice of the muscle relaxant for rapid-sequence induction. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 2001;23:71-76.

Scott DB. History of Mendelsons syndrome. J Int Med Res. 1978;6(^s1):47-51.

Carvalho VH, Braga Ade F, Braga FS. The influence of lidocaine and racemic bupivacaine on neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium: A study in rat phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparation. Acta Cir Bras. 2009;24:211-215.

Loyola YC, Braga Ade F, Poterio GM. [Influence of lidocaine on the neuromuscular block produced by rocuronium: study in rat phrenic-diaphragmatic nerve preparation.]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2006;56:147-156.

Gentry CL, Lukas RJ. Local anesthetics noncompetitively inhibit function of four distinct nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;299:1038-1048.

Pagan OR, Sivaprakasam K, Oswald RE. Molecular properties of local anesthetics as predictors of affinity for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85:2943-2949.

Spitzmaul G, Gumilar F, Dilger JP. The local anaesthetics proadifen and adiphenine inhibit nicotinic receptors by different molecular mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157:804-817.

Schultz P, Ibsen M, Ostergaard D. Onset and duration of action of rocuronium: from tracheal intubation, through intense block to complete recovery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:612-617.

Nava-Ocampo AA, Velazquez-Armenta Y, Moyao-Garcia D. Meta-analysis of the differences in the time to onset of action between rocuronium and vecuronium. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;33:125-130.

Xue FS, Liao X, Liu JH. A comparative study of the dose-response and time course of action of rocuronium and vecuronium in anesthetized adult patients. J Clin Anesth. 1998;10:410-415.

Cantineau JP, Porte F, Honneur G. Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium on the diaphragm and adductor pollicis muscles in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:585-590.

Wright PM, Caldwell JE, Miller RD. Onset and duration of rocuronium and succinylcholine at the adductor pollicis and laryngeal adductor muscles in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1110-1115.

Dhonneur G, Kirov K, Slavov V. Effects of an intubating dose of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the larynx and diaphragm: an electromyographic study in humans. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:951-955.

Siddik-Sayyid SM, Taha SK, Kanazi GE. Excellent intubating conditions with remifentanil-propofol and either low-dose rocuronium or succinylcholine. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:483-488.

Efeito da utilização de 2 mg.kg-1 de lidocaína endovenosa na latência de duas doses diferentes de rocurônio e na resposta hemodinâmica à intubação traqueal

Effects of 2 mg.kg-1 of intravenous lidocaine on the latency of two different doses of rocuronium and on the hemodynamic response of orotracheal intubation

Gustavo Gameiro Vivancos; Jyrson Guilherme Klamt; Luís Vicente Garcia

Resumo

Palavras-chave

Abstract

Keywords

References

Links

Share

Braz J Anesthesiol