Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942010000600006
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Avaliação hemodinâmica não invasiva de mulheres não grávidas, gestantes saudáveis e gestantes com pré-eclâmpsia usando biorreatância

Non-invasive hemodynamic assessment of non-pregnant, healthy pregnant and preeclamptic women using bio-reactance

Yayoi Ohashi; Hisham Ibrahim; Louis Furtado; John Kingdom; José Carlos Almeida Carvalho

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942010000600006 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.60, n6, p.608-613, 2010
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 969

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Comparamos os perfis hemodinâmicos de gestantes saudáveis e com pré-eclâmpsia leve, a termo, assim como de controles saudáveis não grávidas, usando um novo monitor de débito cardíaco não invasivo (NICOM, do inglês) baseado na biorreatância. MÉTODOS: Estudamos gestantes saudáveis a termo (Preg, n = 10), gestantes a termo com pré-eclâmpsia leve (PregPE, n = 10) e mulheres saudáveis não grávidas (NonPreg, n = 10). Com as pacientes na posição de semidecúbito lateral esquerdo, 4 eletrodos do NICOM foram colocados na parede do tórax. Essa colocação foi seguida de um período de descanso de 15 minutos. Variáveis hemodinâmicas, incluindo pressão arterial sistólica (PAS), diastólica (PAD) e média (PAM), assim como frequência cardíaca (FC), volume sistólico (VS), resistência periférica total (RPT), débito cardíaco (DC), potência cardíaca (PC) e tempo de ejeção ventricular (TEV) foram monitorados por 15 minutos. RESULTADOS: Os grupos Preg e NonPreg apresentaram perfis hemodinâmicos semelhantes, exceto por um TEV mais curto no grupo Preg (213,3 ± 19,3 ms versus 265,0 ± 28,8 ms, p < 0,001). O grupo PregPE apresentou PAS, PAD e PAM mais elevadas, assim como PC (145,5 ± 12,6 mmHg; 94,5 ± 9,1 mmHg; 111,5 ± 9,8 mmHg; 1,6 ± 0,3 watts) quando comparado com os grupos Preg (114 ± 12,1 mmHg; 71,2 ± 8,4 mmHg; 85,9 ± 9,3 mmHg; 1,1 ± 0,3 watts) e NonPreg (101,2 ± 11,9 mmHg; 66,7 ± 10,4 mmHg; 78,1 ± 10,6 mmHg; 1,0 ± 0,2 watts). O grupo Preg apresentou FC, DC e RPT maiores e TEV mais curto (85,4 ± 8,4 batimentos.min-1; 6,6 ± 0,7 L.min-1; 1.369,9 ± 173,5 dina.seg.cm-5, 221,6 ± 22,4 ms) quando comparado ao grupo NonPreg (67,9 ± 9,5 batimentos.min-1; 5,6 ± 0,7 L.min-1; 1.136,9 ± 149,8 dina.seg.cm-5, 265,0 ± 28,8 ms). CONCLUSÕES: O NICOM é um equipamento fácil de ser usado, que independe do operador e fornece sinais de monitoramento claros e consistentes. A avaliação identificou perfis hemodinâmicos distintos e consistentes com os achados obtidos com métodos mais invasivos.

Palavras-chave

FISIOLOGIA, HEMODINÂMICA, MONITORAÇÃO, MONITORAÇÃO, Gravidez

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We compared hemodynamic profiles of healthy and mildly preeclamptic pregnant women at term, as well as those of non-pregnant controls, using a new non-invasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM) based on bio-reactance. METHODS: We studied healthy term pregnant women at term (Preg, n = 10), mildly preeclamptic pregnant women at term (PregPE, n = 10), and healthy non-pregnant female volunteers (NonPreg, n = 10). With the subjects in the semi left lateral position, 4 electrodes of the NICOM device were applied to their chest wall, followed by a 15-minute rest period. Hemodynamic variables, including the systolic (SBP), diastolic (DPB) and mean arterial (MAP) pressures, as well as the heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), total peripheral resistance (TPR), cardiac output (CO), cardiac power output (CPO), and ventricular ejection time (VET) were then monitored for 15 minutes. RESULTS: The Preg and NonPreg groups showed similar hemodynamic profiles, except for a shorter VET in the Preg group (213.3 ± 19.3 ms versus 265.0 ± 28.8 ms, p < 0.001). The PregPE group showed higher SBP, DBP and MAP, as well as CPO (145.5 ± 12.6 mmHg; 94.5 ± 9.1 mmHg; 111.5 ± 9.8 mmHg; 1.6 ± 0.3 watts), compared to both the Preg (114 ± 12.1 mmHg; 71.7 ± 8.4 mmHg; 85.9 ± 9.3 mmHg; 1.1 ± 0.3 watts) and NonPreg (101.2 ± 11.9 mmHg; 66.7 ± 10.4 mmHg; 78.1 ± 10.6 mmHg; 1.0 ± 0.2 watts) groups. The PregPE group showed higher HR, CO, and TPR, and shorter VET (85.4 ± 8.4 beats.min-1; 6.6 ± 0.7 L.min-1; 1,369.9 ± 173.5 dyne.sec.cm-5, 221.6 ± 22.4 ms) compared to the NonPreg group (67.9 ± 9.5 beats.min-1; 5.6 ± 0.7 L.min-1; 1,136.9 ± 149.8 dyne.sec.cm-5, 265.0 ± 28.8 ms). CONCLUSIONS: The NICOM device is simple to use, operator independent, and provides clear and consistent monitoring signals. The output identified distinct hemodymamic profiles that are consistent with the findings of more invasive existing methods.

Keywords

PHYSIOLOGY, HEMODYNAMICS, MONITORING, MONITORING, PREGNANCY

References

Monga M. Maternal Cardiovascular, Respiratory and Renal Adaptation to Pregnancy. Craesy and Resnik's Maternal Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. 2009:101-109.

Metcalfe J, McAnulty JH, Ueland K. Cardiovascular physiology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981;24:693-710.

Leeman L, Fontaine P. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78:93-100.

Marik PE. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Postgrad Med. 2009;121:69-76.

Khalil A, Jauniaux E, Harrington K. Antihypertensive therapy and central hemodynamics in women with hypertensive disorder in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:646-654.

Gogarten W. Preeclampsia and anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:347-351.

von Dadelszen P, Magee LA, Roberts JM. Subclassification of preeclamspia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2003;22:143-148.

Huppertz B. Placental origins of preeclampsia: challenging the current hypothesis. Hypertension. 2008;51:970-975.

Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Gagliardi G. Early and late preeclampsia: two different maternal hemodynamic states in the latent phase of the disease. Hypertension. 2008;52:873-880.

Benedetti TJ, Cotton DB, Read JC. Hemodynamic observations in severe pre-eclampsia with a flow-directed pulmonary artery catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136:465-470.

Benedetti TJ, Kates R, Williams V. Hemodynamic observations in severe preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;152:330-334.

Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:5-14.

Dyer RA, James MF. Maternal hemodynamic monitoring in obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:765-767.

Milsom I, Forssman L, Sivertsson R. Measurement of cardiac stroke volume by impedance cardiography in the last trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983;62:473-479.

Masaki DI, Greenspoon JS, Ouzounian JG. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution: A preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:680-684.

Easterling TR, Watts DH, Schmucker BC. Measurement of cardiac output during pregnancy: validation of Doppler technique and clinical observations in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:845-850.

San-Frutos LM, Fernández R, Almagro J. Measure of hemodynamic patterns by thoracic electrical bioimpedance in normal pregnancy and in preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121:149-153.

Engoren M, Barbee D. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Am J Crit Care. 2005;14:40-45.

Bio-reactance. .

Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bio-reactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293:H583-589.

Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1191-1194.

Eckstein KL, Marx GF. Aortocaval compression and uterine displacement. Anesthesiology. 1974;40:92-96.

Kinsella SM, Whitwam JG, Spencer JAD. Aortic compression by the uterus: identification with the Finapres digital artery pressure instrument. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:700-705.

Swaminathan M, Phillips-Bute BG, Mathew JP. An assessment of two different methods of left ventricular ejection time measurement by transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:642-647.

Aronow WS, Bowter AF, Kaplan MA. External isovolemic contraction times and left ventricular ejection time/external isovolemic contraction time rations at rest and after exercise in coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1971;43:59-65.

Bromley PD, Hodges LD, Brodie DA. Physiological range of peak cardiac power output in healthy adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006;26:240-246.

De Backer D. Can passive leg raising be used to guide fluid administration?. Crit Care. 2006;10:170-171.

Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:85-90.

5dcea34e0e8825e44dbf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections