Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942008000600010
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Review Article

Compressão da cartilagem cricóide: aspectos atuais

Compression of the cricoid cartilage. Current aspects

Eduardo Toshiyuki Moro; Alexandre Goulart

Downloads: 2
Views: 1701

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Sellick descreveu a importância da pressão aplicada na cartilagem cricóide para a prevenção da regurgitação do conteúdo gástrico durante a indução da anestesia. Desde então a manobra tem sido universalmente aceita pelos anestesiologistas como um passo fundamental durante a indução com a técnica de seqüência rápida. O presente artigo teve como objetivo discutir as indicações, a técnica, as complicações e os motivos pelos quais alguns autores têm contestado a eficácia dessa técnica. CONTEÚDO: Foram revisadas as indicações, a técnica e as complicações da manobra de compressão da cartilagem cricóide. Também foram discutidos os aspectos que têm motivado alguns autores a abandonar a manobra de Sellick durante a indução anestésica com a técnica de seqüência rápida. CONCLUSÕES: A aplicação da manobra de compressão da cartilagem cricóide exige o conhecimento da anatomia da via aérea superior e da força correta a ser empregada. Estudos endoscópicos e radiológicos, assim como pacientes que apresentaram aspiração pulmonar a despeito da aplicação da manobra de Sellick, têm colocado em questão a utilidade da técnica. Além disso, quando mal empregada, pode causar deformidade dessa cartilagem, fechamento das cordas vocais e dificuldade de ventilação. Apesar do papel de destaque representado pela manobra de Sellick na prevenção da aspiração pulmonar, não há garantia de proteção das vias aéreas para todos os pacientes, sobretudo quando a técnica não é corretamente aplicada.

Palavras-chave

COMPLICAÇÕES, COMPLICAÇÕES, INTUBAÇÃO, Traqueal, INTUBAÇÃO, Traqueal

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sellick described the importance of applying pressure in the cricoid cartilage during anesthesia induction to prevent regurgitation of gastric contents. Since then, the maneuver has been widely accepted by anesthesiologists as a fundamental step during induction with the rapid sequence technique. The objective of the present report was to discuss the indications, technique, complications, and reasons why some authors have refuted the efficacy of this technique.
CONTENTS: The indications, technique, and complications of compression of the cricoid cartilage were reviewed. The aspects that have motivated some authors to abandon the Sellick maneuver during anesthetic induction with the rapid sequence technique are also discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The cricoid cartilage pressure maneuver requires knowledge of the anatomy of upper airways and the correct force to be used. Endoscopic and radiologic studies, as well as patients who developed pulmonary aspiration despite the use of Sellick maneuver, have raised doubts about the usefulness of this technique. Besides, can cause deformity of the cricoid cartilage, closure of the vocal cords, and difficulty to ventilate if it is not used properly. Despite the importance given to Sellick maneuver in preventing pulmonary aspiration, there are no guarantees it will protect the airways of all patients, especially when the technique is not properly used.

Keywords

COMPLICATIONS: pulmonary aspiration, gastric contents; INTUBATION, Tracheal: Sellick maneuver, rapid sequence.

References

Landsman I. Cricoid pressure: indications and complications. Ped Anesth. 2004;14:43-47.

Sellick BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anesthesia. Lancet. 1961;19:404-406.

Cheney FW. Aspiration: a liability hazard for the anesthesiologist?. ASA Newsletter. 2000;64:1-3.

Warner MA, Warner ME, Warner DO. Perioperative pulmonary aspiration in infants and children. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:66-71.

Mac GPJH, Ball DR. The effect of cricoid pressure on the cricoid cartilage and vocal cords: an endoscopic study in anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:263-268.

Smith KJ, Dobranowski J, Yip G. Cricoid pressure displaces the esophagus: an observational study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:60-64.

Smith KJ, Ladak S, Choi PTL. The cricoid cartilage and the esophagus are not aligned in close to half of adults patients. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49:503-507.

Priebe HJ. Cricoid pressure: an alternative view. Semin Anesth Per Med Pain. 2005;24:120-126.

Brock-Utne JG. Is cricoid pressure necessary?. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12:1-4.

Jöhr M. Anaesthesia for the child with a full stomach. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20:201-203.

Nelipovitz DT, Crosby ET. No evidence for decreased incidence of aspiration after rapid sequence induction. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:748-764.

Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1269-77.

Fanning GL. The efficacy of cricoid pressure in preventing regurgitation of gastric contents. Anesthesiology. 1970;32:553-555.

Vanner RG, O'Dwyer JP, Pryle BJ. Upper esophageal sphincter pressure and the effect of cricoid pressure. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:95-100.

Tournadre JP, Chassard D, Berrada KR. Cricoid cartilage pressure decreases lower esophageal sphincter tone. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:7-9.

Skinner HJ, Bedforth NM, Girling KJ. Effect of cricoid pressure on gastro-oesophageal reflux in awake subjects. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:798-800.

Meek T, Gittins N, Duggan JE. Cricoid pressure: Knowledge and performance amongst anaesthetic assistants. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:59-62.

Koziol CA, Cuddleford JD, Moos DD. Assessing the force generated with application of cricoid pressure. AORN. 2000;72:1018-1030.

Vanner RG, Pryle BG. Regurgitation and eosophafeal rupture with cricoid pressure: a cadaver study. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:732-735.

Vanner RG, Asai T. Safe use of cricoid pressure. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:1-3.

Crowley DS, Giesecke AH. Bimanual cricoid pressure. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:588-589.

Howells TH, Chamney AR, Wraight WJ. The application of cricoid pressure: An assessment and survey of its practice. Anaesthesia. 1983;38:457-460.

Flucker CJR, Hart E, Weisz M. The 50-millilitre syringe as an inexpensive training aid in the application of cricoid pressure. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000;17:443-447.

Lawes EG, Duncan PW, Bland B. The cricoid yoke a device for providing consistent and reproducible cricoid pressure. Br J Anaesth. 1986;58:925-931.

Ashurst N, Rout CC, Rocke DA. Use of a mechanical simulator for training in applying cricoid pressure. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:468-472.

Herman NL, Carter B, Van Decar TK. Cricoid pressure: teaching the recommended level. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:859-863.

Kopka A, Robinson D. The 50 ml syringe training aid should be itilized immediately before cricoid pressure application. Eur J Emerg Med. 2005;12:155-158.

Wilson NP. No pressure! Just feel the force.... Anaesthesia. 2003:1135-1136.

Morris J, Cook TM. Rapid sequence induction: a national survey. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:1090-1097.

Stedford J, Stoddart P. RSI in paediatric anesthesia is it used by nonpediatric anesthetists?: A survey from south-west England. Pediatr Anesth. 2007;17:235-242.

Vanner RG. Mechanisms of regurgitation and its prevents with cricoid pressure. Int J Obst Anesth. 1993;2:207-215.

Palmer JH, Mac G, Ball DR. The effect of cricoid pressure on the cricoid cartilage and vocal cords: an endoscopic study in anaesthetized patients. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:260-287.

Cicarelli DD, Stábile Jr SL, Momi T. Intubação traqueal: avaliação da eficácia da manobra BURP. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1999;49:24-26.

Vanner RG, Clarke P, Moore WJ. The effect of cricoid pressure and neck support on the view of laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:896-900.

Turgeon AF, Nicole PC, Trépanier CA. Cricoid pressure does increase the rate of failed intubation by direct laryngoscopy in adults. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:315-319.

Snider DD, Clarke D, Finucane BT. The "BURP" maneuver worsens the glotic view when applied in combination with cricoid pressure. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:100-104.

Moynihan RJ, Brock-Utne JG, Archer JH. The effect of cricoid pressure on preventing gastric insufflation in infants and children. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:652-6.

Asai T, Barclay K, Power I. Cricoid pressure impedes placement of the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74:521-525.

Cheng WL, Xue FS, Xu YC. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized, paralysed patients. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1195-1198.

Aoyama K, Takenaka I, Sata T. Cricoid pressure impedes positioning and ventilation through the laryngeal mask airway. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43:1035-1040.

Salem MR, Joseph NJ, Heyman HJ. Cricoid compression is effective in obliterating the esophageal lumen in the presence of a nasogastric tube. Anesthesiology. 1985;63:443-446.

Kristensen MS, Gellett S, Bach AB. Hemodynamics and arterial oxygen saturation during preoperative emptying of the stomach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;35:342 344.

Ferrer M, Bauer TT, Torres A. Effect of nasogastric tube size on gastroesophageal reflux and microaspiration in intubated patients. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:991-994.

Roewer N. Can pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents be prevented by balloon occlusion of the cardia?: A study with a new nasogastric tube. Anesth Analg. 1995;80:378-383.

Schwarzmann GF, Wurmb T, Grein CA. Difficult airway management: combination of the laryngeal mask airway with a new gastric balloon tube. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1237A.

Moro ET. Prevenção da aspiração pulmonar do conteúdo gástrico. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2004;54:261-275.

5dd57a5e0e8825270fc8fca6 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections