Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942006000100004
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Profilaxia do prurido causado pela administração subaracnóidea de sufentanil: efeitos do droperidol, da nalbufina, do ondansetron e da combinação deles

Prevention of itching after spinal sufentanil: effects of droperidol, nalbuphine, ondansetron and the association of them

André Kolm; Alexandre Alberto Fontana Ferraz; Norma Sueli Pinheiro Módolo; Fábio Ferrari; Eliana Marisa Ganem; Geraldo Rolim Rodrigues Júnior; Paulo do Nascimento Júnior; Giane Nakamura; Lais Helena Camacho Navarro; Rodrigo Moreira Lima

Downloads: 0
Views: 1641

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O uso espinhal de opióides pode causar alguns efeitos indesejáveis, dentre os quais, o mais freqüente é o prurido que, apesar de sua baixa morbidade, pode proporcionar desconforto intenso ao paciente e prolongar o período de internação. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar diversas opções terapêuticas no tratamento profilático do prurido após administração de sufentanil por via subaracnóidea. MÉTODO: Foram distribuídos de maneira aleatória, por sorteio, 100 pacientes a serem submetidos à intervenção cirúrgica não-obstétricas em cinco grupos, de acordo com o tratamento utilizado: controle (ausência de tratamento - C); droperidol 2,5 mg (D); nalbufina 10 mg (N); associação dos medicamentos anteriores (DN) e ondansetron 8 mg (O). O prurido foi avaliado quantitativamente 30 minutos, 1, 2, e 3 horas após a administração subaracnóidea de sufentanil. RESULTADOS: Os grupos C e O apresentaram incidência significativamente maior de prurido em relação aos grupos D, N e DN. Entretanto, não houve diferença significativa na necessidade de tratamento específico com naloxona entre os grupos tratados. CONCLUSÕES: O tratamento profilático do prurido neste estudo, independentemente do fármaco utilizado, diminuiu sua intensidade e limitou a necessidade de tratamento específico com naloxona.

Palavras-chave

ANALGESIA, ANALGÉSICOS, Opióides, ANTAGONISTAS, ANTIEMÉTICOS, ANTIEMÉTICOS, COMPLICAÇÕES

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal opioids may cause some undesirable effects, the most frequent of which is itching. In spite of its low morbidity rate, itching may cause severe discomfort to patients in addition to prolonging hospital stay. This study aimed at evaluating different therapeutic options to prevent itching after spinal sufentanil. METHODS: Participated in these study 100 patients scheduled for non-obstetric procedures, who were randomly distributed in five groups: control (no treatment - C); 2.5 mg droperidol (D); 10 mg nalbuphine (N); association of previous drugs (DN); and 8 mg ondansetron (O). Pruritus was quantitatively evaluated at 30 minutes, 1, 2 and 3 hours after spinal sufentanil. RESULTS: Groups C and O had significantly higher incidence of itching as compared to groups D, N and DN. However, there has been no significant difference in the need for specific treatment with naloxone among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Itching prevention in our study, regardless of the drug used, has decreased its severity and has limited the need for specific treatment with naloxone.

Keywords

ANALGESIA, ANALGESICS, Opioids, ANTAGONISTS, ANTIEMETICS, ANTIEMETICS, COMPLICATIONS

References

Yaksh TL, Hammond DL. Spinal opiate analgesia: characteristics and principles of action. Peripheral and central pathways in pain. Pain. 1981.

Bromage PR, Camporesi EM, Durant PA. Nonrespiratory side effects of epidural morphine. Anesth Analg. 1982;61:490-495.

Chaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:891-903.

Morgan M. The rational use of intrathecal and extradural opioids. Br J Anaesth. 1989;63:165-188.

Azar I, Turndorf H. Severe hypertension and multiple atrial premature contractions following naloxone administration. Anesth Analg. 1979;58:524-525.

Gowan JD, Hurtig JB, Fraser RA. Naloxone infusion after prophylactic epidural morphine: effects on incidence of postoperative side-effects and quality of analgesia. Can J Anaesth. 1988;35:143-148.

Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OH, Saiah M. Subhypnotic doses of propofol relieve pruritus induced by epidural and intrathecal morphine. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:510-512.

Nunes RR. Prevenção do prurido causado por morfina peridural com doses sedativas de propofol. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1997;47:29-31.

Warwick JP, Kearns CF, Scott WE. The effect of subhypnotic doses of propofol on the incidence of pruritus after intrathecal morphine for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:270-275.

Horta BL, Horta ML. Inhibition of epidural morphine-induced pruritus by intravenous droperidol. Reg Anesth. 1993;18:118-120.

Horta ML, Ramos L, Goncalves Zda R. Inhibition of epidural morphine-induced pruritus by intravenous droperidol: The effect of increasing the doses of morphine and of droperidol. Reg Anesth. 1996;21:312-317.

Carvalho JC, Mathias RS, Senra WG. Systemic droperidol and epidural morphine in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 1991;72.

Penning JP, Samson B, Baxter AD. Reversal of epidural morphine-induced respiratory depression and pruritus with nalbuphine. Can J Anaesth. 1988;35:599-604.

Schworer H, Ramadori G. Improvement of cholestatic pruritus by ondansetron. Lancet. 1993;341(8855).

Raderer M, Muller C, Scheithauer W. Ondansetron for pruritus due to cholestasis. N Eng J Med. 1994;330.

Arai L, Stayer S, Schwartz R. The use of ondansetron to treat pruritus associated with intrathecal morphine in two paediatric patients. Paed Anaesth. 1996;6:337-339.

Owczarzack Jr D, Oliveira Filho GR, Ghellar MR. Prevalência de prurido durante tratamento profilático de náuseas e vômitos induzidos por morfina peridural no pós-operatório de cesarianas: comparação entre ondansetron e metoclopramida. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1999;49:240-243.

Krause L, Shuster S. Mechanism of action of antipruritic drugs. Br Med J Clin Res Ed. 1983;287(6400):1199-1200.

Hu JW, Dostrovsky JO, Sessle BJ. Functional properties of neurons in cat trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn): I. Responses to oral-facial noxious and nonnoxious stimuli and projections to thalamus and subnucleus oralis. .

Presynaptic excitability changes produced in brain stem endings of tooth pulp afferents by raphe and other central and peripheral influences. J Neurophysiol. 1981;45:173-192.

Ballantyne JC, Loach AB, Carr DB. Itching after epidural and spinal opiates. Pain. 1988;33:149-160.

Snyder SH. Opiate receptors in the brain. N Eng J Med. 1977;296:266-271.

Greaves MW, Wall PD. Pathophysiology of itching. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):938-940.

5dd438b20e8825b657c63495 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections