Variação da pressão sistólica como método diagnóstico da hipovolemia durante anestesia para cirurgia cardíaca

Ricardo Vieira Carlos; Cristina Salvadori Bittar; Marcel Rezende Lopes; José Otávio Costa Auler Júnior

doi:10.1590/S0034-70942005000100002

Scientific Article

Variação da pressão sistólica como método diagnóstico da hipovolemia durante anestesia para cirurgia cardíaca

Systolic pressure variation as diagnostic method for hypovolemia during anesthesia for cardiac surgery

Ricardo Vieira Carlos; Cristina Salvadori Bittar; Marcel Rezende Lopes; José Otávio Costa Auler Júnior

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942005000100002 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.55, n1, p.3-18, 2005

PDF

Downloads: 0

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A estimativa acurada do volume intravascular efetivo é de grande importância em pacientes submetidos a procedimentos cirúrgicos de grande porte. A avaliação da volemia, baseada na variação da pressão sistólica (VPS), (diferença entre os valores sistólicos máximos e mínimos durante um ciclo respiratório controlado mecanicamente) e sua variável delta down (dDown) tem se mostrado um indicador sensível da pré-carga, quando cotejados com parâmetros hemodinâmicos convencionais. Como a VPS não é um parâmetro utilizado rotineiramente para avaliação da volemia, este trabalho teve como objetivo introduzir a técnica da medida da VPS e verificar sua validade em pacientes submetidos à anestesia para cirurgia cardíaca. MÉTODO: A partir de programa de computador especialmente desenvolvido, transmitiu-se em tempo real a variação da pressão arterial a partir do monitor da sala cirúrgica para microcomputador conectado em rede. Após a adaptação deste sistema, foram estudadas as variações da pressão sistólica em nove pacientes submetidos à revascularização do miocárdio. As variáveis foram registradas em dois momentos, utilizando-se a expansão volêmica como indicador: M0 (antes da expansão volêmica) e M1 (após a expansão volêmica). Também foram estudados alguns parâmetros hemodinâmicos convencionais, confrontados com a variação da pressão sistólica. RESULTADOS: Os principais resultados deste estudo mostram que a VPS, em seu componente dDown, é a que apresenta maior consistência de variação após a expansão volêmica com amido.Os demais parâmetros hemodinâmicos estudados, embora apontem para nítida melhora cardiovascular após a expansão, possuem alta variabilidade entre os pacientes e mesmo quanto à resposta ao expansor. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados obtidos mostram que a VPS se comporta como um sensível indicador da volemia, em pacientes sob ventilação mecânica, quando correlacionada às variações da pressão venosa central, pressão capilar pulmonar e índice sistólico.

Palavras-chave

CIRURGIA, MONITORIZAÇÃO, MONITORIZAÇÃO, MONITORIZAÇÃO, MONITORIZAÇÃO, MONITORIZAÇÃO, VOLEMIA

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An accurate predictor of effective intravascular volume is of paramount importance for patients submitted to major surgical procedures. A new method to evaluate intravascular volume based on systolic blood pressure variations (SPV), (difference between the maximum and minimum systolic values during controlled respiratory cycle) and its variable delta down (dDown) has shown to be a sensitive indicator of ventricular preload. As SPV is not routinely used in clinical practice our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of this parameter in evaluating volume status of patients submitted to cardiac surgery. METHODS: As from specially developed software, blood pressure variation was transmitted in real time from operating room monitor to a network-connected computer. After the adaptation of this system, nine patients submitted to cardiac surgery were evaluated. Variables were recorded in two moments: T0 (before volume replacement) and TP (after volume replacement). At the same time, conventional hemodynamic parameters were also studied and compared to systolic pressure variation. RESULTS: Primary study results have shown that SPV (systolic pressure variation), in its dDown component, presents the best variation consistency after volume replacement with starch. Remaining hemodynamic parameters evaluated, although pointing to clear cardiovascular improvement after replacement, are highly variable among the patients and even on expander's response. CONCLUSIONS: Results have shown that SPV is a sensitive method to evaluate intravascular volume status in patients under mechanical ventilation, when correlated to central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and systolic index variations.

Keywords

MONITORING, MONITORING, MONITORING, MONITORING, MONITORING, SURGERY, VOLEMIA

References

Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients: SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA. 1996;276:889-897.

Iberti TJ, Fischer EP, Leibowitz AB. multicenter study of physicians' knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter: Pulmonary Artery Catheter Study Group. JAMA. 1990;264:2928-2932.

O'Quin R, Marini JJ. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure: clinical physiology, measurement, and interpretation. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;128:319-326.

Morris AH, Chapman RH, Gardner RM. Frequency of technical problems encountered in the measurement of pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:164-170.

Marik PE. Pulmonary artery catheterization and esophageal Doppler monitoring in the ICU. Chest. 1999;116:1085-1091.

Godje O, Peyerl M, Seebauer T. Central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and intrathoracic blood volumes as preload indicators in cardiac surgery patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;13:533-539.

Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology. 1987;67:498-502.

Pizov R, Ya´ari Y, Perel A. The arterial pressure waveform during acute ventricular failure and synchronized external chest compression. Anesth Analg. 1989;68:150-156.

Szold A, Pizov R, Segal E et al. The effect of tidal volume and intravascular volume state on systolic pressure variation in ventilated dogs. Intensive Care Med. 1989;15:368-371.

Pizov R, Segal E, Kaplan L et al. The use of systolic pressure variation in hemodynamic monitoring during deliberate hypotension in spine surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1990;2:96-100.

Coriat P, Vrillon M, Perel A. A comparison of systolic blood pressure variations and echocardiographic estimates on end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1994;78:46-53.

Rooke GA, Schwid HA, Shapira Y. The effect of graded hemorrhage and intravascular volume replacement on systolic pressure variation in humans during mechanical and spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg. 1995;80:925-932.

Ornstein E, Eidelman LA, Drenger B. Systolic pressure variation predicts the response to acute blood loss. J Clin Anesth. 1998;10:137-140.

Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1313-1321.

Boldt J, Lenz M, Kumle B. Volume replacement strategies on intensive care units: results from a postal survey. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:147-151.

Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2000;4:282-289.

Hansen RM, Viquerat CE, Matthay MA. Poor correlation between pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic volume after coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology. 1986;65:764-770.

Raper R, Sibbald WJ. Misled by the wedge?: The Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest. 1986;89:427-434.

Fontes ML, Bellows W, Ngo L. Assessment of ventricular function in critically ill patients: limitations of pulmonary artery catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13:521-527.

Pinsky MR. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:386-388.

DiCorte CJ, Latham P, Greilich PE. Esophageal Doppler monitor determinations of cardiac output and preload during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1782-1786.

Jacka MJ, Cohen MM, To T. The use of and preferences for the transesophageal echocardiogram and pulmonary artery catheter among cardiovascular anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1065-1071.

Cheung AT, Savino JS, Weiss SJ. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic indexes of left ventricular preload in patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:376-387.

Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD. The use of the transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:351-355.

Singer M, Bennett ED. Noninvasive optimization of left ventricular filling by esophageal Doppler. Crit Care Med. 1991;19:1132-1137.

Gan TJ, Arrowsmith JE. The oesophageal Doppler monitor. BMJ. 1997;315:893-894.

Schmid ER, Spahn DR, Tornic M. Reliability of a new generation transesophageal Doppler device for cardiac output monitoring. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:971-979.

Paiva Filho O, Braz JRC, Silva FP. Variação da pressão sistólica como indicador precoce de hipovolemia e guia de reposição volêmica com solução hiperosmótica e hiperoncótica no cão. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2003;53:361-376.

Brower R, Wise RA, Hassapoyannes C. Effects of lung inflation on lung blood volume and pulmonary venous flow. J Appl Physiol. 1985;58:954-963.

Pinsky MR, Matuschak GM, Klain M. Determinants of cardiac augmentation by elevations in intrathoracic pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1985;58:1189-1198.

Permutt S, Wise RA, Brower RG. How Changes in Pleural Pressure and Alveolar Pressure Cause Changes in Afterload and Preload. Heart-lung Interactions in Health and Disease. 1989:243-250.

Tachinardi U, Furuie SS, Bertozzo N. Hypermedia patient data retrieval and presentation through WWW. Proc Ann Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:551-555.

Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations: Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:124-126.

Variação da pressão sistólica como método diagnóstico da hipovolemia durante anestesia para cirurgia cardíaca

Systolic pressure variation as diagnostic method for hypovolemia during anesthesia for cardiac surgery

Ricardo Vieira Carlos; Cristina Salvadori Bittar; Marcel Rezende Lopes; José Otávio Costa Auler Júnior

Resumo

Palavras-chave

Abstract

Keywords

References

Links

Share

Braz J Anesthesiol