Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942004000100013
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Miscellaneous

Influência da clonidina por via venosa no custo de anestesia com sevoflurano em cirurgias de ouvido médio em regime ambulatorial

Influence of intravenous clonidine in the cost of sevoflurane anesthesia for outpatient middle ear procedures

Renato Mestriner Stocche; Luís Vicente Garcia; Jyrson Guilherme Klamt; Marlene Paulino dos Reis; Daniela Rocha Gil; Karin Luiza Magno Mesquita

Downloads: 0
Views: 1010

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A clonidina é um agente a2-agonista que diminui o consumo de anestésicos venosos e inalatórios. Este estudo visou avaliar a relação custo-benefício da medicação pré-anestésica com clonidina por via venosa em anestesia geral com sevoflurano em regime ambulatorial. MÉTODO: Trata-se de estudo encoberto, aleatório, controlado com placebo, realizado com pacientes com idade entre 15 e 52 anos. Os pacientes foram divididos em 3 grupos de 15: Grupo S (placebo), Grupo C3 (clonidina 3 µg.kg-1) e Grupo C5 (5 µg.kg-1). A indução anestésica foi feita com sevoflurano, alfentanil (30 µg.kg-1) e pancurônio (0,08 mg.kg-1). Foram anotados a freqüência de complicações, consumo de halogenados, tempo de anestesia, tempo de recuperação fase I e II. A análise de custos considerou gastos diretos e indiretos. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferenças entre os grupos em relação aos dados demográficos, freqüência de complicações e tempo para recuperação anestésica fase I. A recuperação anestésica fase II foi prolongada no grupo C5 (p < 0,05). O consumo de sevoflurano por minuto de cirurgia foi 0.54 ± 0,14 no grupo S e 0,33 ± 0,09 e 0,34 ± 0,13 nos grupos C3 e C5, respectivamente (p < 0,05). Nos grupos que receberam clonidina, o custo foi diminuído em aproximadamente 35%. CONCLUSÕES: A clonidina (3 µg.kg-1) por via venosa diminui o consumo de sevoflurano sem aumentar o tempo de recuperação fase II. A dose de 5 µg.kg-1, apesar de diminuir o consumo de sevoflurano, prolonga a recuperação fase II, não se adequando ao regime ambulatorial.

Palavras-chave

ANESTESIA, ANESTÉSICOS, Volátil, DROGAS, a2- agonista

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clonidine is an a2-agonist which decreases intravenous and inhalational anesthetics consumption. This study aimed at evaluating the cost-benefit ratio of preanesthetic medication with intravenous clonidine for general anesthesia with sevoflurane in outpatient procedures.
METHODS: Forty five patients aged 15 to 52 years were included in this double-blind, randomized and placebo controlled study, and were distributed in 3 groups of 15: Group S (placebo), Group C3 (3 µg.kg-1 clonidine) and Group C5 (5 µg.kg-1 clonidine). Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane, alfentanil (30 µg.kg-1) and pancuronium (0.08 mg.kg-1). The following parameters were recorded: incidence of complications, halogenate consumption and anesthesia duration, as well as phase I and II recovery time. Cost analysis has considered direct and indirect costs.
RESULTS: There were no differences among groups in demographics data, incidence of complications and phase I anesthetic recovery. Phase II anesthetic recovery was prolonged in Group C5 (p < 0.05). Sevoflurane consumption per minute of surgery was 0.54 ± 0.14, 0.33 ± 0.09 and 0.34 ± 0.13 in Groups S, C3 and C5 respectively (p < 0.05). Costs were approximately 35% lower in the clonidine groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous clonidine (3 µg.kg-1) decreases sevoflurane consumption without prolonging phase I recovery. Although decreasing sevoflurane consumption, 5 µg.kg-1 clonidine prolongs phase II recovery, thus being inadequate for outpatient procedures.

Keywords

ANESTHESIA: Ambulatory; ANESTHETICS, Volatile: sevoflurane; DRUGS, a2- agonist: clonidine

References

Bain J, Kelly H, Snadden D. Day surgery in Scotland: patient satisfaction and outcomes. Qual Health Care. 1999;8:86-91.

Eger EI, White PF, Bogetz MS. Clinical and economic factors important to anaesthetic choice for day-case surgery. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:245-262.

Howie MB, Hiestand DC, Jopling MW. Effect of oral clonidine premedication on anesthetic requirement, hormonal response, hemodynamics, and recovery in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:263-272.

Friedberg BL, Sigl JC. Clonidine premedication decreases propofol consumption during bispectral index (BIS) monitored propofol-ketamine technique for office-based surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:848-852.

Eberhart LH, Novatchkov N, Schricker T. Clonidine compared to midazolam for intravenous premedication for ambulatory procedures: A controlled double blind study in ASA I patients. Anaesthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzthe. 2000;35:388-393.

Watcha M, White PF. Economics of anesthetic practice. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:1170-1196.

Chung F. Practical issues in outpatient anaesthesia: discharge criteria - a new trend. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:1056-1058.

Szocik JF, Learned DW. Impact of a cost containment program on the use of volatile anesthetics and neuromuscular blocking drugs. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6:378-382.

Hawkes C, Miller D, Martineau R. Evaluation of cost minimization strategies of anaesthetic drugs in a tertiary care hospital. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:894-901.

Kantor G, Chung F. Anaesthesia drug cost, control and utilization in Canada. Can J Anesth. 1996;43:9-16.

Broadway PJ, Jones JG. A method of costing anaesthetic practice. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:56-63.

Stocche RM, Garcia LV, Klamt JG. Comparação entre nifedipina por via sub-lingual e clonidina por via venosa no controle de hipertensão peri-operatória em cirurgias de catarata. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2002;52:426-433.

5dd7f85b0e88250d1c13f286 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections