Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942003000400012
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Miscellaneous

Rotinas de cuidados pós-anestésicos de anestesiologistas brasileiros

Postanesthetic routines of Brazilian anesthesiologists

Getúlio Rodrigues de Oliveira Filho

Downloads: 2
Views: 738

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Não existem dados sobre a disponibilidade de equipamentos nas Salas de Recuperação Pós-Anestésica (SRPA), as rotinas de monitorização e os critérios de alta pós-anestésica utilizados pelos anestesiologistas brasileiros. Este estudo visou obter estas informações. MÉTODO: Foi pesquisada uma amostra aleatória de 1123 anestesiologistas. Os dados foram analisados por tabulação simples e cruzada e por regressão logística. RESULTADOS: Foram analisados 271 questionários (26,59%). O estudo revelou que a maioria dos anestesiologistas atua em instituições que possuem SRPA equipadas com dispositivos de reanimação, fontes de oxigênio, aspiradores, cardioscópios, oxímetros de pulso e que mantêm anestesiologista de plantão. A existência de monitores de função neuromuscular e dispositivos de aquecimento ativo é menos freqüente. Em ordem decrescente de freqüência, são monitorizados rotineiramente a pressão arterial, a freqüência cardíaca, a SpO2, o nível de consciência, a patência das vias aéreas, a freqüência respiratória, as náuseas e vômitos, a dor pós-operatória e a força muscular. A oxigenioterapia, os antieméticos e o tratamento de calafrios pós-operatórios são administrados rotineiramente ou a pacientes selecionados pela maioria dos anestesiologistas. A maioria dos anestesiologistas registra os dados pós-anestésicos. CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo sugere que os anestesiologistas brasileiros preocupam-se com a segurança dos pacientes no período pós-anestésico imediato, conforme atestam a elevada disponibilidade de equipamentos e os percentuais expressivos de monitorização de parâmetros isolados. Algumas rotinas de monitorização precisam ser implementadas de acordo com as novas diretrizes de cuidados pós-anestésicos e os novos critérios de alta para pacientes ambulatoriais.

Palavras-chave

ANESTESIOLOGIA, ANESTESIOLOGISTA, RECUPERAÇÃO PÓS-ANESTÉSICA, RECUPERAÇÃO PÓS-ANESTÉSICA

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no data on Postanesthetic Care Units (PACU) equipment, monitoring routines and discharge criteria adopted by Brazilian anesthesiologists. This study aimed at obtaining such data. METHODS: A nationwide survey was conducted with a random sample of 1123 anesthesiologists. Data were analyzed by simple and cross tabulation and logistic regression. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-one questionnaires (26.59%) were analyzed. The study showed that most anesthesiologists work in institutions with PACUs equipped with resuscitation equipment, oxygen sources, aspirators, cardioscopes, pulse oximeters and with an anesthesiologist on duty. Neuromuscular function monitors and active heating devices are less frequent. In a descending order of frequency, the following parameters are routinely monitored: blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2, consciousness level, airway patency, respiratory rate, nausea and vomiting, postoperative pain and muscle strength. Oxygen therapy, anti-emetics and postanesthetic shivering control are prescribed on a routine or selective basis by most anesthesiologists who also record postoperative data. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Brazilian anesthesiologists are concerned about patients’ safety during postanesthetic recovery, as shown by high equipment availability in the PACU and expressive routine monitoring ratios of isolated parameters. Some monitoring routines should be implemented to comply with new guidelines on postanesthetic care and new discharge criteria for outpatient procedures.

Keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGIST, ANESTHESIOLOGY, POSTANESTHETIC RECOVERY, POSTANESTHETIC RECOVERY

References

Cangiani LM, Porto AM. Anestesia ambulatorial. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2000;50:68-85.

Task Force on Postanesthetic Care: Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:742-752.

Backstrom CH, Hursh-César G. Survey Research. 1981:52-118.

Mattar FN. Pesquisa de Marketing. 1999:300-337.

Eaker S, Bergström R, Bergström A. Response ratio to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:74-82.

DiBenedetto RJ, Graves AS, Gravenstein N. Pulse oximetry monitoring can change routine oxygen supplemen- tation practices in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 1994;78:365-368.

Vegfors M, Cederholm I, Lennmarken C. Should oxygen be administered after laparoscopy in healthy patients?. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988;32:350-352.

Oliveira Filho GR, Garcia JHS, Ghellar MR. Fatores associados com a ocorrência de hipoxemia no período pós-anestésico imediato. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2001;51:185-195.

Macario A, Weinger M, Truong P. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? The perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:1085-1091.

De Witte J, Sessler DI. Perioperative shivering. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:467-484.

Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roewer N. Pharmacological treatment of postoperative shivering: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:453-460.

Oliveira Fº GR, Utzig LC, Linhares SF. Arterial blood gases during shivering and after its treatment with meperidine, oxygen or both. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80(^s1):89.

Macario A, Dexter F. What are the most important risk factors for a patient’s developing intraoperative hypothermia. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:215-220.

Chung F, Mezei G. Factors contributing to prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1352-1359.

Sinclair DR, Chung F, Mezei G. Can postoperative nausea and vomiting be predicted. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:109-118.

Junger A, Hartmann B, Benson M. The use of an anesthesia information management system for prediction of antiemetic rescue treatment at the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1203-1209.

Pavlin DJ, Pavlin EG, Gunn HC. Voiding in patients managed with or without ultrasound monitoring of bladder volume after outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:90-97.

Pavlin DJ, Pavlin EG, Fitzgibbon DR. Management of bladder function after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:42-50.

Jin F. Should adult patients drink fluids before discharge from ambulatory surgery?. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:306-311.

Bengtssom M, Lüfstrüm JB, Malmqvist LA. Skin conductance responses during spinal analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985;29:67-71.

Brull SJ, Greene NM. Time-courses of zones of differential sensory blockade during spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric tetracaine or bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1989;69:342-347.

Pflug AE, Aasheim GM, Foster C. Sequence of return of neurological function and criteria for safe ambulation following subarachnoid block (spinal anaesthetic). Can Anaesth Soc J. 1978;25:133-139.

Hayes AH, Mirakhur RK, Breslin DS et al. Postoperative residual block after intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:312-318.

Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Morgensen J et al. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications: A prospective, randomized, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:1095-1103.

Kopman AF, Yee PS, Neuman GG. Relationship of train-of-four fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:765-771.

Chung F, Ritchie E, Sun J. Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:808-816.

Chung F, Chan VWS, Ong D. A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1995;7:500-506.

Marshall SI, Chung F. Discharge criteria and complications after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:508-517.

White PF, Song D. New criteria for fast-tracking after outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with the modified Aldrete’s scoring system. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:1069-1072.

5ddd34370e8825667e1da3e9 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections