Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2026.844820
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Review Article

Efficacy and safety of preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Eficácia e segurança da dexmedetomidina intranasal pré-operatória em adultos: uma revisão sistemática e metanálise de ensaios clínicos randomizados

Vitaliy Voznyy, Mouad Elganga, Leya Tawfik, Tony Tan, Sammie Yu, Ellene Yan, Aparna Saripella, Marina F. Englesakis, Frances Chung

Downloads: 0
Views: 10

Abstract

Background

Airway manipulation during General Anesthesia (GA) can produce sympathetic activation and hemodynamic instability. Intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine attenuates these responses but may cause bradycardia or hypotension. Intranasal (IN) administration is a noninvasive alternative with uncertain evidence in adults. We evaluated preoperative IN dexmedetomidine in adult patients undergoing GA.

Methods

We performed a PROSPERO-registered (CRD420251250492) systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CDSR were searched from inception to November 26, 2025. IN dexmedetomidine versus control and IN vs. IV dexmedetomidine were assessed separately. Random-effects models pooled continuous outcomes as MDs/SMDs and adverse events as RRs. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB2 and certainty of evidence using GRADE.

Results

Across 25 trials including 1,968 patients, IN dexmedetomidine was associated with deeper sedation (SMD = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.18–1.34) and reduced heart rate and mean arterial pressure at induction, intubation, and during the early intraoperative period compared with control (MD range: -12.7 to -13.4 bpm and -7.8 to -10.7 mmHg, respectively). Rates of bradycardia and hypotension were similar between IN dexmedetomidine and control groups. Compared with IV dexmedetomidine, IN administration resulted in lighter sedation (SMD = -0.54; 95% CI: -1.08 to -0.01), with similar hemodynamic effects, while bradycardia and hypotension occurred less frequently.

Conclusion

Preoperative IN dexmedetomidine may improve sedation and blunt peri-induction hemodynamic responses compared with controls, with broadly similar hemodynamic effects and fewer observed cardiovascular adverse events versus IV administration. However, certainty was low or very low for several efficacy outcomes, and larger well-designed trials are needed.

Keywords

Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Anesthesia; General; Dexmedetomidine; Hemodynamics; Meta-analysis as topic

Resumo

Introdução

A manipulação das vias aéreas durante a anestesia geral (AG) pode produzir ativação simpática e instabilidade hemodinâmica. A dexmedetomidina intravenosa (IV) atenua essas respostas, mas pode causar bradicardia ou hipotensão. A administração intranasal (IN) é uma alternativa não invasiva com evidências incertas em adultos. Avaliamos a dexmedetomidina IN pré-operatória em pacientes adultos submetidos à AG.

Metódos

Realizamos uma revisão sistemática e metanálise de ensaios randomizados registrada no PROSPERO (CRD420251250492). As bases de dados MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL e CDSR foram consultadas desde o início até 26 de novembro de 2025. A dexmedetomidina IN versus controle e a dexmedetomidina IN versus IV foram avaliadas separadamente. Modelos de efeitos aleatórios agruparam desfechos contínuos como diferenças médias (DM)/diferenças médias padronizadas (DMP) e eventos adversos como riscos relativos (RR). O risco de viés foi avaliado por meio do RoB2 e a certeza da evidência utilizando a metodologia GRADE.

Resultados

Em 25 ensaios que incluíram 1.968 pacientes, a dexmedetomidina IN foi associada a uma sedação mais profunda (DMP = 0,76; IC 95% 0,18–1,34) e à redução da frequência cardíaca e da pressão arterial média na indução, intubação e durante o período intraoperatório precoce em comparação com o controle (faixa de DM: -12,7 a -13,4 bpm e -7,8 a -10,7 mmHg, respectivamente). As taxas de bradicardia e hipotensão foram semelhantes entre os grupos dexmedetomidina IN e controle. Em comparação com a dexmedetomidina IV, a administração IN resultou em sedação mais leve (DMP = -0,54; IC 95% -1,08 a -0,01), com efeitos hemodinâmicos semelhantes, ao passo que a bradicardia e a hipotensão ocorreram com menor frequência.

Conclusão

A dexmedetomidina IN pré-operatória pode melhorar a sedação e atenuar as respostas hemodinâmicas peri-indução em comparação com os controles, com efeitos hemodinâmicos amplamente semelhantes e menos eventos adversos cardiovasculares observados em relação à administração IV. No entanto, a certeza foi baixa ou muito baixa para diversos desfechos de eficácia, sendo necessários ensaios maiores e bem desenhados.

Palavras-chave

Administração intranasal; Adulto; Anestesia geral; Dexmedetomidina; Hemodinâmica; Metanálise como assunto

References

1. Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI. Cardiac Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery. Longo, editor. Cardiac Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2258−69. editor.

2. Thompson A, Fleischmann KE, Smilowitz NR, et al. 2024 AHA/ ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery. JACC. 2024;84:1869−969.

3. Tan T, Yan E, Alhamdah Y, Wong J, Chung F. Longitudinal prevalence of perioperative neurocognitive disorders in older surgical patients: a multicenter longitudinal prospective cohort study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2025;45:101693.

4. Weerink MAS, Struys MMRF, Hannivoort LN, Barends CRM, Absalom AR, Colin P. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:893−913.

5. Jo YY, Kim HS, Lee KC, Chang YJ, Shin Y, Kwak HJ. CONSORT the effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses during emergence from nasotracheal intubation after oral surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e6661.

6. Meng Z, Ding T, Zhao W, et al. Perioperative dexmedetomidine reduces the risk of postoperative complications in high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2025. https://doi.org/10.1097/ CM9.0000000000003648.

7. Wang G, Niu J, Li Z, Lv H, Cai H. The efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0202620.

8. Verret M, Le JBP, Lalu MM, et al. Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine on patient-centred outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2024;133:615−27.

9. De Cassai A, Boscolo A, Geraldini F, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation: A meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021;72:110287.

10. Grassin-Delyle S, Buenestado A, Naline E, et al. Intranasal drug delivery: an efficient and non-invasive route for systemic administration: focus on opioids. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;134:366−79.

11. Iirola T, Vilo S, Manner T, et al. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67:825−31.

12. Jun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY, Song SM. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 2017;64:947−61.

13. Zhang G, Xin L, Yin Q. Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs. oral midazolam for premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1264081.

14. Wang D, Dou W, Hu J, et al. Pre-operative dexmedetomidine nasal spray and emergence agitation in adults undergoing ear, nose and throat surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2025;80:1519−27.

15. Kochhar A, Panjiar P. Mohd Butt K. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2021;72:1−6.

16. Suryawanshi DC, Ravindran DDG, Sathvika DP, Jawale DR. Efficacy of preoperative dexmedetomidine nebulization on blunting the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. J Pharm Negat Results. 2022;13(Special Issue 6):4196−205.

17. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160.

18. Higgins. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5.

19. MECIR Manual | Cochrane Internet. cited 2025 Sep 21. Available from: https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-andmanuals/mecir-manual.

20. Grossetta NH, Wang L. Yale MeSH Analyzer Internet. cited 2025 Sep 21. Available from: https://mesh.med.yale.edu/.

21. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

22. Balduzzi S, Rucker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta- analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019;22:153−60.

23. Viechtbauer W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36:1−48.

24. Schunemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Internet. 2013. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook. html#h.svwngs6pm0f2.

25. GRADEproGDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool Software. Internet. McMaster University and Evidence Prime; cited 2025 Sep 20. Available from: https://www.gradepro.org/.

26. Yang WY, Huang K, Lin ZJ, et al. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for the management of preoperative anxiety-related insomnia: a randomized, three-blinded, clinical trial compared with lorazepam and placebo. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024;18:6061−73.

27. He J, Zhang X, Li C, Fu B, Huang Y, Li H. Dexmedetomidine nasal administration improves perioperative sleep quality and neurocognitive deficits in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024;24:42.

28. Niu JY, Yang N, Tao QY, et al. Effect of Different Administration Routes of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2023;136:1075−83.

29. Lu C, Zhang LM, Zhang Y, et al. Intranasal Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Premedication for Patients Undergoing Suspension Laryngoscopy: A Randomized Double-Blind Study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0154192.

30. Wu X, Hang LH, Wang H, et al. Intranasally Administered Adjunctive Dexmedetomidine Reduces Perioperative Anesthetic Requirements in General Anesthesia. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57:998 −1005.

31. Qiao H, Chen J, Li W, Shen X. Intranasal atomised dexmedetomidine optimises surgical field visualisation with decreased blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized study. Rhinol J. 2016;54:38−44.

32. Singh G, Lnu H, Verma R, et al. Effects of Intranasal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation and Skull Pin Holder Fixation: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2025;17:e76980.

33. Fang J, Yang J, Zhai M, Zhang Q, Zhang M, Xie Y. Effects of shortterm preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine plus conventional treatment on delirium following cardiac surgery in patients with sleep disorders. Perioper Med. 2024;13:17.

34. Kohaf NA, Harby SA, Abd-Ellatief AF, Elsaid MA, Abdelmottaleb NA, Elsalam TFA. Premedication with intranasal versus intravenous dexmedetomidine for hypotensive anesthesia during functional endoscopic sinus surgery in adults: A randomized tripleblind trial. Heliyon. 2024;10:e25175.

35. Padmasree MK, Nelamangala K. A comparative study between intranasal and intravenous dexmedetomidine and hemodynamic responses during endotracheal intubation. Cureus. 2023;15:e35196.

36. Singh V, Pahade A, Mowar A. Comparison of Intravenous Versus Nebulized Dexmedetomidine for Laryngoscopy and IntubationInduced Sympathoadrenal Stress Response Attenuation. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2022;12:e132607.

37. Safavi SMR, Honarmand A, Nazemroaya B, Ataie AM. The effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances caused by laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2022;14:225−32.

38. Zeng W, Chen L, Liu X, et al. Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for the Treatment of Pre-operative Anxiety and Insomnia: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, and Clinical Trial. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:816893.

39. Wu J, Han Y, Lu Y, Zhuang Y, Li W, Jia J. Perioperative Low Dose Dexmedetomidine and Its Effect on the Visibility of the Surgical Field for Middle Ear Microsurgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:760916.

40. Niyogi S, Biswas A, Chakraborty I, Chakraborty S, Acharjee A. Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with dexmedetomidine: A comparison between intravenous and intranasal route. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:915.

41. Jayaraman L, Sinha A, Punhani D. A comparative study to evaluate the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral alprazolam as a premedication agent in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29:179.

42. Gupta P, Koul V, Gupta M, Bharaj S. Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Intravenous Dexmedetomidine as Premedication in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Surgeries under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Clin Diagn Research. 2025;19:UC23−8.

43. Choudhary RK, Kumar A, Singh HD, Das S. Comparative Study between Intranasal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine as a Premedication to Attenuate Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Elective Surgery. Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res. 2024;16:271−81.

44. Mohamed Hassan A, Nashaat Mohammed M, Abdo Mousa S, Elsharkawy RA. A comparative study between the effect of intravenous versus intranasal dripping of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative blood loss during functional endoscopic nasal sinus surgery. Egypt J Anaesth. 2024;40:171−8.

45. Kaila D, Sharma S, Mehta N. Effect of pre-operative dexmedetomidine nebulisation on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res. 2023;12:125−31.

46. Niyogi S, Das A, Acharya A, Nayak J, Chakraborty I. Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine for attenuation of laryngoscopic stress response in adult patient posted for elective lumbar spine surgery: a randomized double blinded, placebo controlled study. J Indian Med Assoc. 2018;116(4).

47. Rani A, Ahlawa G, Kumar A, Kshetrapal K, Ahlawat M, Bala R. Nebulised Dexmedetomidine versus Nebulised Lignocaine in Blunting the Haemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomised Control Study. J Clin Diagn Research. 2024;18:UC05−9.

48. Rocha KO, Santos ERF de A, Pombeiro MM, Fidelis MN da SL, Kakehasi FM, Teixeira DC. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Anesthesiol (Engl Ed). 2026;76:844717.

49. Zhang Z, Ferretti V, Guntan I, et al. Neuronal ensembles sufficient for recovery sleep and the sedative actions of a2 adrenergic agonists. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:553−61.

50. Gao Z, Jiang Y, Liu Y, Yang C, Zhang B, Li M. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine use associated with prolonged postanesthesia care unit recovery time after lung resection: a retrospective cohort study. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1649139.

51. Seppanen SM, Kuuskoski R, Makela KT, Saari TI, Uusalo P. Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Reduces Postoperative Opioid Requirement in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty Under General Anesthesia. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:978−85. e1.

52. Uusalo P, Jatinvuori H, Loyttyniemi E, Kosola J, Saari TI. Intranasal Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine Reduces Postoperative Opioid Requirement in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty Under General Anesthesia. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34:686−92.e2.

53. Szabo B. Presynaptic Adrenoceptors. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2024;285:185−245.

54. Khan FA, Ullah H. Pharmacological agents for preventing morbidity associated with the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(7): CD004087.


Submitted date:
03/17/2026

Accepted date:
07/31/2026

6ab58312a9539530d139ec04 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections