Comparative efficacy of perioperative lidocaine infusion versus thoracic epidural analgesia for pain management in abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
Eficácia comparativa da infusão perioperatória de lidocaína versus analgesia peridural torácica para o controle da dor em cirurgias abdominais: revisão sistemática e meta-análise
Gustavo R.M. Wegner, Bruno F.M. Wegner, Ramon Huntermann, Manoela L. Pinto, Júlia A.P. Vieira, Amanda P. de Souza, Francisco J.L. Bezerra
Abstract
Background
Recent randomized clinical trials have compared the perioperative use of Intravenous (IV) lidocaine and Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted on Embase, Web of Science (all databases), Cochrane Library, and PubMed on March 25, 2024, adhering to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines.
Results
Out of 1261 screened studies, 6 were included. TEA provided superior pain relief on a 0 to 10 pain scale at rest compared to IV lidocaine at 2 (n = 335, MD = -0.72, 95% CI -0.19 to -1.25, p = 0.007423, I2 = 83%) and 24 hours postoperatively (n = 402; MD = -0.18, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.23; p < 0.000001, I2 = 18%). However, no statistically significant differences were observed on pain scores at rest at 48 and 72 hours. TEA provided superior pain relief on a 0 to 10 pain scale during coughing at 24 hours postoperatively (n = 360; MD = -0.36, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.52, p = 0.000019, I2 = 2%), but no statistically significant differences were observed in pain scores on coughing at 48 and 72 hours. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first flatus, or length of hospital stay.
Conclusion
TEA provides more effective postoperative pain relief compared to IV lidocaine during the first postoperative day, as evidenced by analyses of pain both at rest and during coughing.
Keywords
Resumo
Introdução
Ensaios clínicos randomizados recentes compararam o uso perioperatório de lidocaína intravenosa (IV) e analgesia peridural torácica (TEA) para controle da dor pós-operatória em pacientes submetidos a cirurgias abdominais.
Métodos
Foi realizada uma busca sistemática nas bases Embase, Web of Science (todas as bases), Cochrane Library e PubMed em 25 de março de 2024, seguindo o Cochrane Handbook e as diretrizes PRISMA.
Resultados
Das 1261 publicações triadas, 6 foram incluídas. A TEA proporcionou alívio da dor superior na escala de dor de 0 a 10 em repouso, em comparação com a lidocaína IV, tanto nas 2 horas (n = 335; MD = -0,72; IC 95% -0,19 a -1,25; p = 0,007423; I² = 83%) quanto nas 24 horas pós-operatórias (n = 402; MD = -0,18; IC 95% -0,12 a -0,23; p < 0,000001; I² = 18%). No entanto, não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas nas pontuações de dor em repouso nas 48 e 72 horas. A TEA também foi superior no alívio da dor na escala de dor de 0 a 10 durante a tosse às 24 horas (n = 360; MD = -0,36; IC 95% -0,19 a -0,52; p = 0,000019; I² = 2%), mas não houve diferenças significativas nas 48 e 72 horas. Não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas quanto a náuseas e vômitos pós-operatórios, tempo até a primeira eliminação de flatos ou tempo de internação hospitalar.
Conclusão
A TEA proporciona alívio da dor pós-operatória mais eficaz do que a lidocaína IV durante o primeiro dia após a cirurgia, tanto em repouso quanto durante a tosse.
Palavras-chave
Referencias
1. Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W, Fry C, Rockall TA. Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1068−78.
2. Moore L. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:22−37.
3. Wagemans MF, Scholten WK, Hollmann MW, Kuipers AH. Epidural anesthesia is no longer the standard of care in abdominal surgery with ERAS. What are the alternatives? Minerva Anestesiol. 2020;86:1079−88.
4. Casas-Arroyave FD, Osorno-Upegui SC, MA Zamudio-Burbano. Therapeutic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion compared with thoracic epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgery: a noninferiority randomised clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2023;131:947−54.
5. Weibel S, Jelting Y, Pace NL, et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6:CD009642.
6. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 17]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.
7. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
8. D’Souza RS, Barrington MJ, Sen A, Mascha EJ, Kelley GA. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Part II): Guidelines for Performing the Systematic Review. Anesth Analg. 2024;138:395−419.
9. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan ‒ a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210.
10. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135.
11. Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or midquartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27:1785−805.
12. WebPlotDigitizer - Copyright 2010-2024 Ankit Rohatgi [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 24]. Available from: https://apps.automeris.io/wpd/.
13. Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Stein B, Carli F. Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:241−8.
14. Jayaprabhu NB, Avula J, Chandy TT, Varghese G, Yadav B, Rebekah G. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion With Thoracic Epidural for Perioperative Analgesia and Quality of Recovery After Surgery in Laparoscopic Left-Sided Colon and Sphincter-Sparing Rectal Resection Surgery. Cureus. 2022;14:e23758.
15. Goldet G, Howick J. Understanding GRADE: an introduction. J Evid-Based Med. 2013;6:50−4.
16. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
17. Kuo CP, Jao SW, Chen KM, et al. Comparison of the effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and i.v. infusion with lidocaine on cytokine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97: 640−6.
18. Swenson BR, Gottschalk A, Wells LT, et al. Intravenous lidocaine is as effective as epidural bupivacaine in reducing ileus duration, hospital stay, and pain after open colon resection: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:370−6.
19. Kutay Yazici K, Kaya M, Aksu B, Unver S. The Effect of Periopera- € tive Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Pain and Postsurgical Recovery Parameters in Gynecologic Cancer Surgery. Clin J Pain. 2021;37:126−32.
20. Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66:15−40.
21. Al-Mazrou AM, Kiely JM, Kiran RP. Epidural analgesia in the era of enhanced recovery: time to rethink its use? Surg Endosc. 2019;33:2197−205.
22. Torgeson M, Kileny J, Pfeifer C, Narkiewicz L, Obi S. Conventional Epidural vs Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Randomized Trial in Colorectal Surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;227:78−83.
23. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ, et al. Epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a nationwide analysis of use and outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:130−6.
24. Borzellino G, Francis NK, Chapuis O, Krastinova E, Dyevre V, Genna M. Role of Epidural Analgesia within an ERAS Program after Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Studies. Surg Res Pract. 2016;2016:7543684.
25. Hubner M, Blanc C, Roulin D, Winiker M, Gander S, Demartines € N. Randomized clinical trial on epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway. Ann Surg. 2015;261:648−53.
26. Tejedor A, Bijelic L, Polanco M, Pujol E. Intravenous lidocaine infusion compared to thoracic epidural analgesia in cytoreductive surgery with or without heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. A retrospective case-cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023;49:597−603.
27. Terkawi AS, Tsang S, Kazemi A, et al. A Clinical Comparison of Intravenous and Epidural Local Anesthetic for Major Abdominal Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:28−36.
28. Coppens S, Uppal V, Hoogma DF, Merjavy P, Rex S. Therapeutic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion compared with thoracic epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgery. Comment on Br J Anaesth. 2023;131:947−54. Br J Anaesth. 2024;132:625-6.
29. Banik RK, Tran BW, Belfar A, Akhtaruzzaman AKM, Nada E, Hanson N. Therapeutic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion compared with thoracic epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgery: factors affecting successful thoracic epidural analgesia. Comment on Br J Anaesth. 2023;131:947−54. Br J Anaesth. 2024;132:1169-70.
30. Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:144−54.
31. Arnuntasupakul V, Van Zundert TCRV, Vijitpavan A, et al. A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and WaveformConfirmed Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:368−73.
32. Leurcharusmee P, Arnuntasupakul V, Chora De La Garza D, et al. Reliability of Waveform Analysis as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:694−7.
Submitted date:
11/10/2024
Accepted date:
28/02/2025