Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2023.08.004
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Narrative Review

Improving perioperative care in low-resource settings with goal-directed therapy: a narrative review

Suzana Margareth Lobo, João Manoel da Silva Junior, Luiz Marcelo Malbouisson

Downloads: 0
Views: 364

Abstract

Perioperative Goal-Directed Therapy (PGDT) has significantly showed to decrease complications and risk of death in high-risk patients according to numerous meta-analyses. The main goal of PGDT is to individualize the therapy with fluids, inotropes, and vasopressors, during and after surgery, according to patients’ needs in order to prevent organic dysfunction development. In this opinion paper we aimed to focus a discussion on possible alternatives to invasive hemodynamic monitoring in low resource settings.

Keywords

Perioperative care Early goal-directed therapy Surgery hemodynamic monitoring

References

1. Nepogodiev D, Martin J, Biccard B, et al. National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery. Global burden of postoperative death. Lancet. 2019;393:401.

2. Lobo SM, de Oliveira NE. Clinical review: What are the best hemodynamic targets for noncardiac surgical patients? Crit Care. 2013;17:210.

3. Ripolles-Melchor J, Abad-Motos A, Cecconi M, et al. Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and postoperative complications in colorectal surgery in Europe: The EuroPOWER international observational study. J Clin Anesth. 2022;80:110752.

4. Saugel B, Kouz K, Scheeren TWL. The ’5 Ts’ of perioperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123:103−7.

5. Chong MA, Wang Y, Berbenetz NM, et al. Does goal-directed haemodynamic and fluid therapy improve peri-operative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:469−83.

6. Giglio M, Manca F, Dalfino L, et al. Perioperative hemodynamic goal-directed therapy, and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016; 82:1199−213.

7. Messina A, Robba C, Calabro L, et al. Association between peri- operative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2021;25:43.

8. Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, et al. OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311:2181−90. Erratum in: JAMA. 2014;312: 1473.

9. Zhao X, Tian L, Brackett A, et al. Classification and differential effectiveness of goal-directed hemodynamic therapies in surgical patients: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Crit Care. 2021;61:152−61.

10. Thacker JK, Mountford WK, Ernst FR, et al. Perioperative Fluid Utilization Variability and Association with Outcomes: Considerations for Enhanced Recovery Efforts in Sample US Surgical Populations. Ann Surg. 2016;263:502−10.

11. Miller TE, Roche AM, Gan TJ. Poor adoption of hemodynamic optimization during major surgery: are we practicing substandard care? Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1274−6.

12. Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, et al. FENICE Investigators; ESICM Trial Group. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1529−37. Erratum in: Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1737-8.

13. Malbouisson LMS, Silva Jr JM, Carmona MJC, et al. A pragmatic multi-center trial of goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:70.

14. Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Torn HM, et al. Intraoperative hypotension, and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:706−21.

15. Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, et al. INPRESS Study Group. Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1346−57.

16. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:e1063−143.

17. Bentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, et al. Will This Hemodynamically Unstable Patient Respond to a Bolus of Intravenous Fluids? JAMA. 2016;316:1298−309.

18. Benes J, Giglio M, Brienza N, et al. The effects of goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2014;18:584.

19. Michard F, Chemla D, Teboul JL. Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey? Crit Care. 2015;19:144.

20. Fellahi JL, Futier E, Vaisse C, et al. Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation-an experts’ opinion paper. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11:58.

21. Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, et al. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017;45: 415−21.

22. Kuiper AN, Trof RJ, Groeneveld AB. Mixed venous O2 saturation and fluid responsiveness after cardiac or major vascular surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:189.

23. Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in highrisk surgical patients. Chest. 2007;132:1817−24.

24. Lobo SM, Rezende E, Knibel MF, et al. Early determinants of death due to multiple organ failure after noncardiac surgery in high-risk patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:877−83.

25. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Schoonderbeek FJ, et al. LACTATE study group. Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:752−61.

26. Monnet X, Bataille A, Magalhaes E, et al. End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:93−100.

27. Habicher M, von Heymann C, Spies CD, et al. Central VenousArterial pCO2 Difference Identifies Microcirculatory Hypoperfusion in Cardiac Surgical Patients With Normal Central Venous Oxygen Saturation: A Retrospective Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29:646−55.

28. Prado L, Lobo F, de Oliveira N, et al. Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation - does it work? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52:297−303.

29. H N LK, Tripathy S, Das PK. Central Venous-to-Arterial CO2 Difference-Assisted Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Management During Major Surgery-A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2022;134:1010−20.

30. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M, et al. Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness by changes in partial end-tidal CO2 pressure during a passive leg-raising maneuver. Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2:9.

31. Toupin F, Clairoux A, Deschamps A, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness with end-tidal carbon dioxide using a simplified passive leg raising maneuver: a prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2016;63:1033−41.

32. Huang H, Wu C, Shen Q, et al. Value of variation of end-tidal carbon dioxide for predicting fluid responsiveness during the passive leg raising test in patients with mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2022;26:20.

33. Shah P, Louis MA. Physiology, Central Venous Pressure 2022 Jul 15. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan−.

34. De Backer D, Vincent JL. Should we measure the central venous pressure to guide fluid management? Ten answers to 10 questions. Crit Care. 2018;22:43.

35. Leone M, Asfar P, Radermacher P, et al. Optimizing mean arterial pressure in septic shock: a critical reappraisal of the literature. Crit Care. 2015;19:101.

36. Malbrain ML, Marik PE, Witters I, et al. Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46:361−80.

37. Freitas MS, Nacul FE, Malbrain MLNG, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension, fluid balance, and adverse outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation. J Crit Care. 2021;62:271−5.

38. De Backer D, Bakker J, Cecconi M, et al. Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:730−41.

39. Silva-Jr JM, Menezes PFL, Lobo SM, et al. Impact of perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapies in surgical patients: economic study and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:71.


Submitted date:
04/17/2023

Accepted date:
08/20/2023

6516ecd9a9539510b3583793 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections