Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2023.08.003
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Editorial

Videolaryngoscopy in anesthesia and perioperative medicine: innovations, challenges, and best practices

Vinícius Caldeira Quintão; Vanessa Henriques Carvalho; Luiz Guilherme Villares da Costa; Paulo Alipio Germano-Filho; José Carlos R. Nascimento; Rodrigo Moreira e Lima; Rogean Rodrigues Nunes; Antônio Carlos Brandao; André P. Schmidt

Downloads: 0
Views: 388


References

1. Bailey B. Laryngoscopy and laryngoscopes−who's first?: the forefathers/four fathers of laryngology. Laryngoscope. 1996;106:939−43.

2. Burkle CM, Zepeda FA, Bacon DR, Rose SH. A historical perspective on use of the laryngoscope as a tool in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1003−6.

3. Miller RA. A new laryngoscope for intubation of infants. Anesthesiology. 1946;7:205.

4. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:191−8.

5. Hansel J, El-Boghdadly K. Are we there yet? The long journey of videolaryngoscopy into the mainstream. Anaesthesia. 2023;78:931−6.

6. Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and metaanalysis update. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129:612−23.

7. Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;4:CD011136.

8. Vargas M, Servillo G, Buonanno P, et al. Video vs. direct laryngoscopy for adult surgical and intensive care unit patients requiring tracheal intubation: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25:7734−49.

9. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:41−52.

10. de Carvalho CC, da Silva DM, Lemos VM, et al. Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in tracheal intubation in adults: a ranking systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2022;77:326−38.

11. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11: CD011136.

12. Li T, Jafari D, Meyer C, et al. Video laryngoscopy is associated with improved first-pass intubation success compared with direct laryngoscopy in emergency department trauma patients. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021;2:e12373.

Howle R, Onwochei D, Harrison SL, Desai N. Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a mixed-methods systematic review and metaanalysis. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68:546−65.

14. Kriege M, Noppens RR, Turkstra T, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of the McGrathTM Mac videolaryngoscope versus conventional laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2023;78: 722−9.

15. Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG, Kovatsis PG, Hunyady AI, et al. Firstattempt success rate of video laryngoscopy in small infants (VISI): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1905−13.

16. Riva T, Engelhardt T, Basciani R, et al. Direct versus video laryngoscopy with standard blades for neonatal and infant tracheal intubation with supplemental oxygen: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023;7:101−11.

17. Eismann H, Sieg L, Etti N, et al. Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins. Eur J Med Res. 2017;22:27.

18. Malito ML, Mathias LADS, Kimura Junior A, Correa GH, Bardauil VR. The impact of introducing a videolaryngoscope in the initial training of laryngoscopy for undergraduate medical students: a simulation randomized trial. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.048. Online ahead of print.

19. Kee A, Ko R, Capistrano R, Dajac M, Taculod J, See KC. Transfer of skills for difficult intubation after videolaryngoscopy training: a randomized simulation study. Crit Care. 2020;24:252.

20. Ruetzler K, Rivas E, Cohen B, et al. McGrath video laryngoscope versus macintosh direct laryngoscopy for intubation of morbidly

obese patients: a randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2020;131:586 −93.

21. Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA, et al. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:418−29.

22. Vuolato C, Caldiroli D, Orena EF. Effects of direct laryngoscopy versus Glidescope videolaryngoscopy on subjective and objective measures of cognitive workload: an in-vivo randomized trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87:971−8.

23. Risse J, Schubert AK, Wiesmann T, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation in thoracic surgery - a randomised controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:150.

24. Yao W, Li M, Zhang C, Luo A. Recent advances in videolaryngoscopy for one-lung ventilation in thoracic anesthesia: a narrative review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:822646.

25. Colak F, Ozgul U, Erdogan MA, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic responses and QTc intervals to tracheal intubation with the McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope in elderly patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019;35:116−22.

26. Sbeghen V, Verdonck O, McDevitt J, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing nociception level (NOL) index, blood pressure, and heart rate responses to direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for intubation: the NOLint project. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68:855−67.

27. Choi S, Yoo HK, Shin KW, et al. Videolaryngoscopy vs. flexible fibrescopy for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2023;78:970−8.

28. Kamga H, Frugier A, Boutros M, Bourges J, Doublet T, Parienti JJ. Flexible nasal bronchoscopy vs. Airtraq. Anaesthesia. 2023;78:963−9.

29. Dutta K, Sriganesh K, Chakrabarti D, Pruthi N, Reddy M. Cervical spine movement during awake orotracheal intubation with fiberoptic scope and McGrath videolaryngoscope in patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine instability: a randomized control trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020;32: 249−55.

30. Kriege M, Hilt JA, Dette F, etal. Impact of direct laryngoscopy vs. videolaryngoscopy on signal quality of recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery: a randomised parallel group trial. Anaesthesia. 2023;78:55−63.

650c4526a953955a5d708184 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections