Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2022.06.001
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Original Investigation

Comparison of the effect of adding midazolam versus fentanyl to intrathecal levobupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean section: double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Comparação do efeito da adição de midazolam versus fentanil à levobupivacaína intratecal em pacientes submetidas a cesariana: ensaio clínico randomizado, duplo-cego

Marwa Mahmoud Abdelrady, Golnar Mohammed Fathy, Mohamed Abdelrady Mohamed Abdallah, Wesam Nashat Ali

Downloads: 0
Views: 695

Abstract

Background: Many adjuvants are added to prolong the effects of spinal analgesia. We investigated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the addition of midazolam or fentanyl to intrathecal levobupivacaine in women undergoing cesarean delivery.

Methods: Eighty patients were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 40). Group M received 10 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine plus 2 mg of midazolam. Group F received 10 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine plus 25 μg of fentanyl. Assessments included motor and sensory block, APGAR score, time to first request for analgesia, postoperative pain score, total consumption of rescue analgesics, and adverse effects.

Results: Sensory blockade was prolonged in Group M compared with Group F (215.58 ± 27.94 vs. 199.43 ± 19.77 min; p = 0.004), with no differences in other characteristics of the spinal block in intraoperative hemodynamics or APGAR score. The mean time to first request for rescue analgesia was longer in Group M (351.45 ± 11.05 min) than in Group F (268.83 ± 10.35 min; p = 0.000). The median total consumption of rescue analgesics in the first 24 hours postoperatively was 30 mg in Group M vs. 60 mg in Group F (p = 0.003). The median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were lower in Group Ethan in Group F from the 8th to the 12th hour postoperatively, with no differences between the groups at other time points. The incidence of adverse effects was higher in Group F than in Group M.

Conclusion: Intrathecal midazolam (2 mg) was superior to intrathecal fentanyl (25 μg) in increasing the duration of the sensory blockade and postoperative analgesia with lower postoperative pain scores and decreasing the incidence of adverse effects.

Keywords

Cesarean section;  Fentanyl;  Levobupivacaine;  Midazolam;  Postoperative analgesia;  Spinal anesthesia

Resumo

Introdução

Muitos adjuvantes são adicionados para prolongar os efeitos da analgesia espinhal. Nós investigamos a eficácia analgésica pós-operatória da adição de midazolam ou fentanil à levobupivacaína intratecal em mulheres submetidas a parto cesáreo.

Métodos

Oitenta pacientes foram distribuídas aleatoriamente em dois grupos (n = 40). O Grupo M recebeu 10 mg de levobupivacaína a 0,5% mais 2 mg de midazolam. O Grupo F recebeu 10 mg de levobupivacaína a 0,5% mais 25 μg de fentanil. As avaliações incluíram bloqueio motor e sensorial, índice de APGAR, tempo até a primeira solicitação de analgesia, índice de dor pós-operatória, consumo total de analgésicos de resgate e efeitos adversos.

Resultados

O bloqueio sensorial foi prolongado no Grupo M em comparação ao Grupo F (215,58 ± 27,94 vs. 199,43 ± 19,77 min; p = 0,004), sem diferenças em outras características da raquianestesia na hemodinâmica intraoperatória ou no escore APGAR. O tempo médio até a primeira solicitação de analgesia de resgate foi maior no Grupo M (351,45 ± 11,05 min) do que no Grupo F (268,83 ± 10,35 min; p = 0,000). A mediana do consumo total de analgésicos de resgate nas primeiras 24 horas de pós-operatório foi de 30 mg no Grupo M vs. 60 mg no Grupo F (p = 0,003). As medianas dos escores da Escala Visual Analógica (EVA) foram menores no Grupo Ethan e no Grupo F da 8ª à 12ª hora de pós-operatório, sem diferenças entre os grupos nos demais momentos. A incidência de efeitos adversos foi maior no Grupo F do que no Grupo M.

Conclusão

O midazolam intratecal (2 mg) foi superior ao fentanil intratecal (25 μg) no aumento da duração do bloqueio sensorial e da analgesia pós-operatória, com menores escores de dor pós-operatória e na diminuição da incidência de efeitos adversos.

Palavras-chave

Cesariana; Fentanil; Levobupivacaína; Midazolam; Analgesia pós-operatória; Raquianestesia

References

1. Naaz S, Shukla U, Srivastava S, Ozair E, Asghar A. A comparative study of analgesic effect of intrathecal nalbuphine and fentanyl as an adjuvant in lower limb orthopedic surgery. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11. UC25-UC8.

2. Kumar R, Sharan R, Bhanavath G, Jarewal V, Neki N. Comparison of intrathecal nalbuphine and clonidine as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine in infraumbilical surgeries. Int J Curr Res Biol Med. 2018;3:1−8.

3. Bidikar M, Mudakanagoudar MS, Santhosh MCB. Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine plus fentanyl for cesarean section. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11:495−8.

4. Kaur K, Johar S, Kumar A, Jain M, Kumar P, Singh A. A comparative study of intrathecal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for patients undergoing cesarean section. Int J Adv Med J. 2019;6:1792−7.

5. Singh A, Gupta A, Datta PK, Pandey M. Intrathecal levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine for inguinal hernia surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71:220−5.

6. Ahmed F, Narula H, Khandelwal M, Dutta D. A comparative study of three different doses of nalbuphine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia abdominal hysterectomy. Indian J Pain. 2016;30:23.

7. Bozdogan Ozyilkan NB, Kocum A, Sener M, et al. Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo for elective cesarean section: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2013;75:64−70.

8. Bharti N, Batra YK, Negi SL. Efficacy of intrathecal midazolam versus fentanyl for endoscopic urology surgery. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2015;21:31−4.

9. Karbasfrushan A, Farhadi K, Amini-Saman J, Bazargan-Hejazi S, Ahmadi A. Effect of intrathecal midazolam in the severity of pain in cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012;14:276−82.

10. Gupta B, Verma R, Kumar S, Chaudhary G. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine and midazolam as adjuncts to lignocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011;27:62−6.

11. Bremerich DH, Kuschel S, Fetsch N, Zwissler B, Byhahn C, Meininger D. Levobupivacaine for parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery. A dose-finding investigation. Anaesthesist. 2007;56:772−9.

12. Shadangi BK, Garg R, Pandey R, Das T. Effects of intrathecal midazolam in spinal anesthesia: a prospective randomized case-control study. Singapore Med J. 2011;52:432−5.

13. Isazadehfar K, Entezariasl M, Aliakbari Z. The effects of adding intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia. J Adv Med Med Res. 2017;24:1−7.

14. Talebi H, Yazdi B, Alizadeh S, Moshiry E, Nourozi A, EghtesadiAraghi P. Effects of a combination of intrathecal lidocaine and two doses of intrathecal midazolam on postoperative pain in patients undergoing herniorrhaphy: a randomized controlled trial. Pak J Biol Sci. 2010;13:1156−60.

15. Valentine JM, Lyons G, Bellamy MC. The effect of intrathecal midazolam on postoperative pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1996;13:589−93.

16. Borg PAJ, Krijnen HJ. Long-term intrathecal administration of midazolam and clonidine. Clin J Pain. 1996;12:63−8.

17. Codero F, Vitalis M, Thikra S. A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of adjuvant intrathecal 2 mg midazolam to 20 micrograms fentanyl on postoperative pain for patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. Afr Health Sci. 2016;16:282−91.

18. Paleti S, Prasad PK, Lakshmi BS. A randomized clinical trial of intrathecal magnesium sulfate versus midazolam with epidural administration of 0.75% ropivacaine for patients with preeclampsia scheduled for elective cesarean section. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018;34:23−8.

19. Safari F, Dabbagh A, Sharifnia M. The effect of adjuvant midazolam compared with fentanyl on the duration of spinal anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine in opium abusers. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;63:521−6.

20. Ho KM, Ismail H. Use of intrathecal midazolam to improve perioperative analgesia: A meta-analysis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;36:365−73.

21. Gupta A, Kamat H, Kharod U. Efficacy of intrathecal midazolam in potentiating the analgesic effect of intrathecal fentanyl in patients undergoing lower limb surgery. Anesth Essays Res. 2015;9:379−83.

22. Sawhney S, Singh RK, Chakraborty S. Use of intrathecal midazolam or fentanyl as an adjunct to spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A randomized controlled study. Med J Armed Forces India. 2019;75:176−83.

23. Bogra J, Arora N, Srivastava P. Synergistic effect of intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. BMC Anesthesiol. 2005;5:1−5.


Submitted date:
11/10/2020

Accepted date:
06/01/2022

62bdb1c3a953953f2d2c5763 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections