Mobile phones of anesthesiologists as reservoirs of nosocomial bacteria in a quaternary teaching hospital: an observational study
Guilherme Haelvoet Correa, Carla de Souza Formigoni, Suzethe Matiko Sasagawa, Mariana Volpe Arnoni, Lígia Andrade da Silva Telles Mathias, Marcelo Jennè Mimica
Mobile phones in hospital settings have been identified as an important source of cross-contamination because of the low frequency with which mobile phones are cleaned by health workers and cyclical contamination of the hands and face. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the mobile phones of the anesthesia team at a teaching hospital are potential reservoirs of nosocomial bacteria. In addition, differences in device sanitization and hand hygiene habits between attending and resident anesthesiologists were correlated with mobile phone colonization.
A prevalence study was conducted over a 6-month period from 2017 to 2018 that involved the collection of samples from the mobile phones of the anesthesiology team and culturing for surveillance. A questionnaire was administered to assess the mobile phone sanitization and hand washing routines of the anesthesia team in specific situations.
Bacterial contamination was detected for 86 of the 128 mobile phones examined (67.2%). A greater presence of Micrococcus spp. on devices was correlated with a higher frequency of mobile phone use (p = 0.003) and a lower frequency of sanitization (p = 0.003). The presence of bacteria was increased on the mobile phones of professionals who did not perform handwashing after tracheal intubation (p = 0.003).
Hand hygiene and device sanitization habits were more important than the use behavior, as a higher presence of bacteria correlated with poorer hygiene habits. Furthermore, handwashing is the best approach to prevent serious colonization of mobile devices and the possible transmission of pathogens to patients under the care of anesthesiologists.
1 B. Schooley, S. Walczak, N. Hikmet, et al. Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications, and the process of care Int J Med Inform., 88 (2016), pp. 62-70
2 AA Klein, GN Djaiani Mobile phones in the hospital—past, present and future Anaesthesia., 58 (2003), pp. 353-357
3 A. Borer, J. Gilad, R. Smolyakov, et al. Cell phones and Acinetobacter transmission Emerg Infect Dis., 11 (2005), pp. 1160-1161
4 M.S. Tekerekoǧlu, Y. Duman, A. Serindag, et al. Do mobile phones of patients, companions and visitors carry multidrug-resistant hospital pathogens? Am J Infect Control., 39 (2011), pp. 379-381
5 F. Ulger, A. Dilek, S. Esen, et al. Are healthcare workers’ mobile phones a potential source of nosocomial infections? Review of the literature J Infect Dev Ctries., 9 (2015), pp. 1046-1053
6 R.R. Brady, J. Verran, N.N. Damani, et al. Review of mobile communication devices as potential reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens J Hosp Infect., 71 (2009), pp. 295-300
7 A.K. Kanayama, H. Takahashi, S. Yoshizawa, et al. Staphylococcus aureus surface contamination of mobile phones and presence of genetically identical strains on the hands of nursing personnel Am J Infect Control., 45 (2017), pp. 929-931
8 Y. Cavari, O. Kaplan, A. Zander, et al. Healthcare workers mobile phone usage: a potential risk for viral contamination. Surveillance pilot study Infect Dis (Lond)., 48 (2016), pp. 432-435
9 A. Amanah, D.R. Apriyanto, H. Fitriani Isolation of Surveillance Pathogenic Fungal Microbial Contaminant on Mobile Phone Open Access Maced J Med Sci., 7 (2019), pp. 3393-3396
10 F. Ulger, S. Esen, A. Dilek, et al. Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens? Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob., 8 (2009), p. 7
11 M. Sadat-Ali, A.K. Al-Omran, Q. Azam, et al. Bacterial flora on cell phones of health care providers in a teaching institution Am J Infect Control., 38 (2010), pp. 404-405
12 H.C. Jeske, W. Tiefenthaler, M. Hohlrieder, et al. Bacterial contamination of anaesthetists’ hands by personal mobile phone and fixed phone use in the operating theatre Anaesthesia., 62 (2007), pp. 904-906
13 DE Fry The hawthorne effect revisited Dis Colon Rectum., 61 (2018), pp. 6-7
14 D. Mark, C. Leonard, H. Breen, et al. Mobile phones in clinical practice: reducing the risk of bacterial contamination Int J Clin Pract., 68 (2014), pp. 1060-1064
15 CLSI Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI supplement M100 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA (2018)
16 J.P. Vandenbroucke, E. von Elm, D.G. Altman, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration PLoS Med., 4 (2007), p. e297
17 A. Casadevall The pathogenic potential of a microbe mSphere., 2 (2017), pp. e00015-e00017
18 P. Pal, A. Roy, G. Moore, et al. Keypad mobile phones are associated with a significant increased risk of microbial contamination compared to touch screen phones J Infect Prev., 14 (2013), pp. 65-68
19 Ja Lindsley, Cd Reynolds, T Williams, et al. How Dirty Is Your Phone? Evaluating Restroom Behavior and Cell Phone Surface Contamination Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf., 46 (2020), pp. 588-590
20 N. Sahni, M. Biswal, K. Gandhi, et al. Quantification of hand hygiene compliance in anesthesia providers at a tertiary care center in northern India Am J Infect Control., 43 (2015), pp. 1134-1136
21 World Health Organization WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: first global patient safety challenge clean care is safer care World Health Organization, Geneva (2009)
22 P.G. Fernandez, R.W. Loftus, T.M. Dodds, et al. Hand hygiene knowledge and perceptions among anesthesia providers Anesth Analg., 120 (2015), pp. 837-843