Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Original Investigation

Comparison of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with two different videolaryngoscopes: A randomized clinical trial

Tülay Çardaközü; Z. ̇Ipek Arslan; Sevim Cesur; Barış Aksu

Downloads: 0
Views: 366


Endotracheal intubation (ETI), which is the gold standard in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), may cause myocardial ischaemia by disturbing the balance between haemodynamic changes and oxygen supply and consumption of the myocardium as a result of sympathetic stimulation. In this study, we aimed to compare two different videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC and Airtraq) in the hemodynamic response to ETI.

Fifty ASA II–III CABG surgery patients were randomly assigned to C-MAC or Airtraq. The hemodynamic data included arterial blood pressure [systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP)] and heart rate (HR) and were recorded at six different points in time: before laryngoscopy-T1, during laryngoscopy-T2, immediately after intubation-T3, and 3 (T4), 5 (T5) and 10 (T6) minutes after intubation. Intraoperative complications were recorded. Patients were questioned about postoperative complications 2 and 24 hours following extubation.

The hemodynamic response to ETI was significantly greater with C-MAC. The increase in HR started with the laryngoscopy procedure, whereas increases in SAP, DAP, and MAP started immediately after ETI (p = 0.024; p = 0.012; p = 0.030; p = 0.009, respectively). In group analyses, T1–T2, T2–T3 and T1–T3 comparisons did not show any significant differences in HR with Airtraq. However, with C-MAC, HR after intubation increased significantly compared to the pre-laryngoscopy values (T1–T3) (p = 0.004). The duration of laryngoscopy was significantly reduced with C-MAC (p < 0.001), but the duration of intubation and total intubation were similar (p = 0.36; p = 0.79).

Compared to C-MAC, the hemodynamic response to ETI was less with Airtraq. Thus, Airtraq may be preferred in CABG patients for ETI.


Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery;  Airtraq;  C-MAC;  Videolaryngoscopy;  Hemodynamic response;  Intubation


1. Henderson J. Airway management in the adult. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller’s Anaesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 1573–610.

2. Barak M, Ziser A, Greenberg A, et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine response to tracheal intubation: direct laryngoscopy compared with fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2003;15:132–6.

3. Schälte G, Scheid U, Rex S, et al. The use of the Airtraq®optical laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in high-risk cardiosurgical patients. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:425.

4. Ezri T, Weisenberg M, Khazin V, et al. Difficult laryngoscopy: incidence and predictors in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery versus general surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17:321–4.

5. Sachidananda R, Umesh G, Shaikh SI. A review of hemodynamic response to the use of different types of laryngoscopes. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2016;20:201–8.

6. Maassen R, van Zundert A. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:955, author reply 955-956.

7. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:369–83.

8. Xue FS, Li HX, Liu YY, et al. Current evidence for the use of CMAC videolaryngoscope in adult airway management: a review of the literature. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:831–41.

9. Gómez-Ríos MA, Nieto Serradilla L. Combined use of an Airtraq ®optical laryngoscope, Airtraq video camera, Airtraq wireless monitor, and a fibreoptic bronchoscope after failed tracheal intubation. Can J Anesth. 2011;58:411–2.

10. Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, et al. Videolaryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:1050–61.

11. Gavrilovska-Brzanov A, Jarallah MA, Cogliati A, et al. Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation Comparing the Airtraq(®) with Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Cardiac Surgical Patients. Acta Inform Med. 2015;23:280–4.

12. Altun D, Ali A, C¸amcı E, et al. Haemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2018;46:434–40.

13. Macintosh RR. A new laryngoscope. Lancet. 1943;i:205.

14. Ng I, Hill AL, Williams DL, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath videolaryngoscope with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in intubating adult patients with potential difficult airways. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:439–43.

15. Stoelting RK. Circulatory changes during direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without prior lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 1977;47:381–4.

16. Kanchi M, Nair HC, Banakal S, et al. Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease: Direct versus video laryngoscopy. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55:260–5.

17. Shah A, Patwa A, Burra V, et al. Comparison of Channelled Blade with Non-channelled Blade of King VisionTM Videolaryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation: A Randomised, Controlled, Multicentric Study. Airway. 2019;2:10–6.

18. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, et al. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:670–9.

19. Kiran S, Tandon U, Dwivedi D, et al. Prolonged hoarseness following endotracheal intubation - not so uncommon? Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:605–6.

20. Rathod Y, Patel RD, Kotak N, et al. Airway Injuries Associated With the Use of Airtraq: A Case Report. IOSR-JDMS. 2015;14:59–61.

21. Kaki AM, Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, et al. Use of Airtraq, C-Mac, and Glidescope laryngoscope is better than Macintosh in novice medical students’ hands: A manikin study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011;5:376–81.

22. McElwain J, Malik MA, Harte BH, et al. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:483–9.

23. McElwain J, Laffey JG. Comparison of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:258–64.

24. Ahmed SM, Doley K, Athar M, et al. Comparison of endotracheal intubation time in neutral position between C-Mac®and Airtraq®laryngoscopes: A prospective randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:338–43.

25. Enlow DH, Pfister C, Richardson E, et al. An analysis of black and caucasian craniofacial patterns. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:279–87.

26. Badawi-Fayad J, Cabanis EA. Three-dimensional Procrustes analysis of modern human craniofacial form. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2007;290:268–76.

27. Sarkılar G, Sargın M, Sarıtas¸ TB, et al. Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with video and direct laryngoscopy in patients scheduled for major cardiac surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:11477–83.

611ff1e5a953957615675f52 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections