Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Original Investigation

Hemodynamic outcome of different ventilation modes in laparoscopic surgery with exaggerated trendelenburg: a randomised controlled trial

Resultado hemodinâmico de diferentes modos de ventilação em cirurgia laparoscópica com Trendelenburg exagerado: um ensaio clínico randomizado

Hakan Yılmaz; Baturay Kansu Kazbek; Ülkü Ceren Köksoy; Ahmet Murat Gül; Perihan Ekmekçi; Gamze Sinem Çağlar; Filiz Tüzüner

Downloads: 0
Views: 732


Purpose: To compare hemodynamic effects of two different modes of ventilation (volume-controlled and pressure-controlled volume guaranteed) in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecology surgeries with exaggerated Trendelenburg position.

Methods: Thirty patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecology operations were ventilated using either volume-controlled (Group VC) or pressure-controlled volume guaranteed mode (Group PCVG) (n = 15 for both groups). Hemodynamic variables were measured using Pressure Recording Analytical Method by radial artery cannulation in addition to peak and mean airway pressures and expired tidal volume.

Results: The only remarkable finding was a more stable cardiac index in Group PCVG, where other hemodynamic parameters were similar. Expired tidal volume increased in Group VC while peak airway pressure was lower in Group PCVG.

Conclusion: PCV-VG causes less hemodynamic perturbations as measured by Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and allows better intraoperative hemodynamic control in exaggerated Trendelenburg position in laparoscopic surgery.


Laparoscopic surgery, Mechanical ventilation, Hemodynamic monitoring


Objetivo: Comparar os efeitos hemodinâmicos de dois modos diferentes de ventilação (volume controlado e volume controlado por pressão garantido) em pacientes submetidas a cirurgias ginecológicas laparoscópicas com posição de Trendelenburg exagerada.

Métodos: Trinta pacientes submetidos a operações de ginecologia laparoscópica foram ventilados usando o modo de volume controlado por volume (Grupo CV) ou o modo de volume garantido por pressão controlada (Grupo VGPC) (n = 15 para ambos os grupos). As variáveis hemodinâmicas foram medidas usando o Método Analítico de Registro de Pressão por canulação da artéria radial, além das pressões máximas e médias das vias aéreas e volume corrente expirado.

Resultados: O único achado notável foi um índice cardíaco mais estável no Grupo VGPC, onde outros parâmetros hemodinâmicos foram semelhantes. O volume corrente expirado aumentou no Grupo CV, enquanto o pico de pressão nas vias aéreas foi menor no Grupo VGPC.

Conclusão: o VGPC causa menos perturbações hemodinâmicas medidas pelo Método Analítico de Registro de Pressão (MARP) e permite melhor controle hemodinâmico intraoperatório na posição de Trendelenburg exagerada em cirurgia laparoscópica.


Cirurgia laparoscópica, Ventilação mecânica, Monitoramento hemodinâmico


1 Wang JP, Wang HB, Liu YJ, et al. Comparison of pressure- and volume-controlled ventilation in laparoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Clin Invest Med. 2015;38:e119-41.

2 Patil S, Koyyalamudi P, Robertson C, et al. Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum and positioning. In: Kaye A, Urman R, editors. Perioperative management in robotic surgery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 20-8.

3 Romagnoli S, Franchi F, Ricci Z, et al. The pressure recording analytical method (PRAM): Technical concepts and literature review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31:1460-70.

4 Oğurlu M, Kü¸cük M, Bilgin F, et al. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:295-300.

5 Kim MS, Soh S, Kim MY, et al. Comparisons of pressure-controlled ventilation with volume guarantee and volume-controlled 1:1 equal ratio ventilation on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A randomized-controlled trial. Int J Med Sci. 2018;15:1522-9.

6 Dion JM, McKee C, Tobias JD, et al. Carbon dioxide monitoring during laparoscopic-assisted bariatric surgery in severely obese patients: transcutaneous versus end-tidal techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29:183-6.

7 Choi EM, Na S, Choi SH, et al. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in steep trendelenburg position for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:183-8.

8 Assad OM, El Sayed AA, Khalil MA. Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation volume guaranteed during laparoscopic surgery in trendelen-burg position. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:55-61.

9 Dion JM, McKee C, Tobias JD, et al. Ventilation during laparoscopic-assisted bariatric surgery: volume-controlled, pressure-controlled or volume-guaranteed pressure-regulated modes. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:2242-7.

10 Hendrickx J, Peyton P, Carette R, et al. Inhaled anaesthetics and nitrous oxide: Complexities overlooked: things may not be what they seem. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:611-9.

11 Li ECK, Balbuena LD, Gamble JJ. Evaluation of nitrous oxide in the gas mixture for anesthesia II (ENIGMA II) revisited: Patients still vomiting. Anesthesiology. 2017;127:204-5.

12 Sen O, Erdogan Doventas Y. Effects of different levels of endexpiratory pressure on hemodynamic, respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017;67:28-34.

13 Ukere A, Marz A, Wodack KH, et al. Perioperative assessment of regional ventilation during changing body positions and ventilation conditions by electrical impedance tomography. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:228-35.

14 Sprung J, Whalley DG, Falcone T, et al. The effects of tidal volume and respiratory rate on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopy in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:268-74.

15 Oksar M, Akbulut Z, Ocal H, et al. Anesthetic considerations for robotic cystectomy: a prospective study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014;64:109-15.

16 Donati A, Carsetti A, Tondi S, et al. Thermodilution vs pressure recording analytical method in hemodynamic stabilized patients. J Crit Care. 2014;29:260-4.

17 Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1834-41.

18 Franchi F, Falciani E, Donadello K, et al. Echocardiography and pulse contour analysis to assess cardiac output in trauma patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:137-46.

19 Franchi F, Silvestri R, Cubattoli L, et al. Comparison between an uncalibrated pulse contour method and thermodilution technique for cardiac output estimation in septic patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:202-8.

20 Balderi T, Forfori F, Marra V, et al. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring during laparoscopic gastric bypass in superobese patients by pressure recording analytical method. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1007-14.

21 Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Fleming NW, et al. Cardiac function during laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:78-83.

22 Scolletta S, Bodson L, Donadello K, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by pulse wave analysis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1025-33.

23 Sangkum L, Liu GL, Yu L, et al. Minimally invasive or non-invasive cardiac output measurement: an update. J Anesth. 2016;30:461-80.

24 Pinsky MR. Cardiopulmonary interactions: Physiologic basis and clinical applications. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15:45-8.

Submitted date:

Accepted date:

60b0f005a95395562a122f93 rba Articles

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections