Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.042
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Clinical Research

Comparison of Proseal LMA with i-Gel in children under controlled ventilation: a prospective randomised clinical study

Praveen Shiveshi, Tejesh Channasandra Anandaswamy

Downloads: 0
Views: 49

Abstract

Background
Supraglottic airway device is presently the most common modality of airway management in children for short surgical procedures. The i-gel is one such novel supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of i-gel compared to LMA Proseal regarding oropharyngeal leak pressure, insertion time, ease of insertion, and fibreoptic view of larynx.

Methods
After obtaining ethical clearance and parental consent, 70 children aged 2–10 years, weighing 10–30 kgs were randomised to receive LMA Proseal or i-gel for airway management. Data with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure, insertion time, ease of insertion, number of attempts, and fibreoptic score were collected. The primary outcome was the oropharyngeal leak pressure with the two supraglottic airway devices measured by manometric stability.

Results
Demographic data were comparable between the two groups. The oropharyngeal leak pressure (LMA Proseal vs. i-gel, 20.51 ± 4.71 cmH2O vs. 19.57 ± 5.71 cmH2O), ease of insertion, number of attempts, and fibreoptic view score was similar between the two groups. The insertion time was faster with i-gel (22.63 ± 5.79 s) compared to LMA Proseal (43.26 ± 7.85 s).

Conclusion
I-gel was similar to LMA Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure in children under controlled ventilation.

Keywords

Laryngeal masks,  Airway management,  Pediatrics,  Anesthesia,  General
607497caa95395666f79d486 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections