Patient safety in an endoscopy unit: an observational retrospective analysis of reported incidents
Segurança do paciente em unidade de endoscopia: análise transversal dos eventos notificados
Cora Salles Maruri Correa, Airton Bagatini, Cassiana Gil Prates, Guilherme Becker Sander
Abstract
Introduction
Patient safety is a serious public health with serious implications on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life of patients, in addition to negatively affecting the public image of health care institutions and professionals. It requires further investigation, especially in specialties lacking published data, such as endoscopy.
Objective
To analyze patient safety incidents reported in a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil.
Methods
This retrospective, cross-sectional study quantitatively described patient safety incidents related to endoscopic procedures. The sample consisted of reports of incidents that occurred from 2015 to 2017. The data were descriptively analysed, and the study was approved by the relevant research ethics committee.
Results
Overall, 42,863 endoscopic procedures were performed and 167 reports were submitted in the period, accounting for a prevalence of incidents of 0.38%. Most incidents did not result in unnecessary harm to patients (76.6%). The most prevalent incidents were those related to patient identification, followed by those related to pathology exams, exam reports, gastrointestinal perforations, skin lesions, falls and medication errors. The rate of adverse events (harm to patient) in patients undergoing any endoscopic procedure was 0.06%.
Conclusions
The incidence of unnecessary harm (adverse event) associated with any endoscopic procedure was relatively low in this study. However, the identification of reported incidents is crucial for evaluating and improving the quality of care provided to patients.
Keywords
References
1 National Patient Safety Foundation (NPSF) RCA2: improving root cause analyses and actions to prevent harm National Patient Safety Foundation, Boston, MA (2015)
2 Committee on Quality of Health Care in America L.T. Kohn, J.M. Corrigan, M.S. Donaldson (Eds.), To ERR is human: building a safer health system, National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2000)
3 J.T. James A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care J Patient Saf, 9 (2013), pp. 122-128
4 M.A. Makary, M. Daniel Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US BMJ., 353 (2016), p. i2139
5 World Health Organization (WHO) The conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety WHO, Geneva, Switzerland (2009)
6 Ministério da Saúde Portaria nº 529, de 1º de Abril de 2013. Institui o Programa Nacional de Segurança do Paciente (PNSP) Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF (2013)
7 H. Ono Early gastric cancer: diagnosis, pathology, treatment techniques and treatment outcomes Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol., 18 (2006), pp. 863-866
8 S. Loperfido, V. Baldo, E. Piovesana, et al. Changing trends in acute upper-GI bleeding: a population-based study Gastrointest Endosc., 70 (2009), pp. 212-224
9 B.K. Abu Dayyeh, A. Acosta, M. Camilleri, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty alters gastric physiology and induces loss of body weight in obese individuals Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol., 15 (2017), pp. 37-43
10 J. Aisenberg Endoscopic sedation: equipment and personnel Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am., 18 (2008), pp. 641-649
11 Lb. Cohen Patient monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy: why, when, and how? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 18 (2008), pp. 651-663
12 P. Van der Linden Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an anesthesiologist’s perspective Digestion., 82 (2010), pp. 102-105
13 T. Wehrmann, K. Triantafyllou Propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a gastroenterologist’s perspective Digestion., 82 (2010), pp. 106-109
14 A.D. Feld Endoscopic sedation: medicolegal considerations Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am., 18 (2008), pp. 783-788
15 Department of Health The “never events” list for 2012/13 Patient Safety and Investigations, London, UK (2012)
16 Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social de España Prevalencia de efectos adversos en hospitales de latinoamérica Estudio IBEAS, Madrid, ES (2010)
17 W. Mendes, M. Martins, S. Rozenfeld, et al. The assessment of adverse events in hospitals in Brazil Int J Qual Health Care., 21 (2009), pp. 279-284
18 R.D. Mitty, D.M. Wild The pre- and postprocedure assessment of patients undergoing sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am., 18 (2008), pp. 627-640
19 Ministério da Saúde Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução RCD nº 6, de 10 de Março de 2013. Dispõe sobre os requisitos de boas práticas de funcionamento para os serviços de endoscopia com via de acesso ao organismo por orifícios exclusivamente naturais Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF (2013)
20 Joint Commission National patient safety goals Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, IL (2006)
21 World Health Organization (WHO), Joint Commission International (JCI), WHO Collaborating Centre for Patient Safety Solutions Patient safety solutions WHO, Geneva, Switzerland (2007)
22 A.I. Miasso, S.H.B. Cassiani Erros na administração de medicamentos: divulgação de conhecimentos e identificação do paciente como aspectos relevantes Rev Esc Enferm USP., 34 (2000), pp. 16-25
23 S.W. Rathgaber, T.M. Wick Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice Gastrointest Endosc., 64 (2006), pp. 556-562
24 Y. Gong, H. Kang, X. Wu, et al. Enhancing patient safety event reporting: a systematic review of system design features Appl Clin Inform, 8 (2017), pp. 893-909
25 H.C. Capucho, E.R. Arnas, S.H.B. Cassiani Segurança do paciente: comparação entre notificações voluntárias manuscritas e informatizadas sobre incidentes em saúde Rev Gaúcha Enferm., 34 (2013), pp. 164-172
26 M. Matharoo, S. Thomas-Gibson, A. Haycock, et al. Implementation of an endoscopy safety checklist Frontline Gastroenterol., 5 (2014), pp. 260-265