Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Pulse pressure variation guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial

Reposição de volume orientada pela variação da pressão de pulso durante transplante renal: estudo randomizado controlado

Alessandro De Cassai, Ottavia Bond, Silvia Marini, Giulio Panciera, Lucrezia Furian, Flavia Neri, Giulio Andreatta, Paolo Rigotti, Paolo Feltracco

Downloads: 27
Views: 1556


Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for end stage renal disease. Although different hemodynamic variables, like central venous pressure and mean arterial pressure, have been used to guide volume replacement during surgery, the best strategy still ought to be determined. Respiratory arterial Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) is recognized to be a good predictor of fluid responsiveness for perioperative hemodynamic optimization in operating room settings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a PPV guided fluid management strategy is better than a liberal fluid strategy during kidney transplantation surgeries. Identification of differences in urine output in the first postoperative hour was the main objective of this study.

We conducted a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. We enrolled 40 patients who underwent kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Patients randomized in the “PPV” group received fluids whenever PPV was higher than 12%, patients in the “free fluid” group received fluids following our institutional standard care protocol for kidney transplantations (10 h-1).

Urinary output was similar at every time-point between the two groups, urea was statistically different from the third postoperative day with a peak at the fourth postoperative day and creatinine showed a similar trend, being statistically different from the second postoperative day. Urea, creatinine and urine output were not different at the hospital discharge.

PPV guided fluid therapy during kidney transplantation significantly improves urea and creatinine levels in the first week after kidney transplantation surgery.


Kidney transplantation;  Fluid therapy;  Creatinine;  Urea;  Urine


Transplante renal é o tratamento padrão-ouro na doença renal em estágio terminal. Embora diferentes variáveis hemodinâmicas, tais como pressão venosa central e pressão arterial média, tem sido usadas para orientar a estratégia de reposição volêmica durante a cirurgia, a melhor estratégia ainda não foi determinada. A Variação da Pressão de Pulso (VPP) durante o ciclo respiratório é reconhecida como um bom preditor da resposta à infusão de volume para otimização hemodinâmica perioperatória no centro cirúrgico. O objetivo do estudo foi estudar se a estratégia de reposição de volume orientada por VPP é melhor do que a estratégia liberal de reposição de volume durante cirurgia de transplante renal.O principal objetivo do estudo foi identificar diferença no débito urinário na primeira hora do pós-operatório.

Realizamos estudo prospectivo, uni-cego, randomizado, controlado. Incluímos 40 pacientes submetidos a transplante renal de doador cadáver. Pacientes randomizados para o grupo “VPP” receberam volume quando a VPP estava acima de 12%, e os pacientes no grupo “reposição liberal” receberam volume de acordo com o nosso protocolo institucional padrão de assistência para transplante renal (10 h-1).

O débito urinário foi semelhante em todos os tempos nos dois grupos, a ureia foi estatisticamente diferente a partir do terceiro dia do pós-operatório com pico no quarto dia do pós-operatório e a creatinina apresentou tendência semelhante, tornando-se estatisticamente diferente a partir do segundo dia do pós-operatório. Ureia, creatinina e débito urinário não estavam diferentes na alta hospitalar.

A terapia orientada por VPP durante transplante renal melhorou de forma significante os níveis de ureia e creatinina na primeira semana pós-transplante renal.


Transplante renal;  Fluido terapia;  Creatinina;  Ureia;  Urina


1 H.J. Lemmens Kidney transplantation: recent developments and recommendations for anesthetic management Anesthesiol Clin North America., 22 (2004), pp. 651-652

2 A.T. Joyce, J.M. Iacoviello, S. Nag, et al. End-stage renal disease-associated managed care costs among patients with and without diabetes Diabetes., 27 (2004), pp. 2829-2835

3 N. Kontodimopoulos, D. Niakas Overcoming inherent problems of preference-based techniques for measuring health benefits: an empirical study in the contest of kidney transplantation BMC Health Services Research., 6 (2006), p. 3

4 A. De Gasperi, S. Narcisi, E. Mazza, et al. Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: is volume overload still mandatory for graft function? Transplant Proc., 38 (2006), pp. 807-809

5 N. Aulakh, K. Garg, A. Bose, et al. Influence of hemodynamics and intra-operative hydration on biochemical outcome of renal transplant recipients J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol., 31 (2015), p. 174

6 M.H. Calixto Fernandes, T. Schricker, S. Magder, et al. Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: a black box Crit Care., 22 (2018), p. 14

7 G. Bacchi, A. Buscaroli, M. Fusari, et al. The influence of intraoperative central venous pressure on delayed graft function in renal transplantation: a single-center experience Transplant Proc., 42 (2010), pp. 3387-3391

8 J. Benes, I. Chytra, P. Altmann, et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: Results of prospective randomized study Crit Care., 14 (2010), p. R118

9 M. Buettner, W. Schummer, E. Huettemann, et al. Influence of systolic-pressure-variation guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport Br J Anaesth., 101 (2008), pp. 194-199

10 M. Cannesson Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth., 24 (2010), pp. 487-497

11 M.R. Lopes, M.A. Oliveira, V.O. Pereira, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial Crit Care., 11 (2007), p. R100

12 J. Karpinski, G. Lajoie, D. Cattran, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation from high-risk donors is determined by both structure and function Transplantation., 67 (1999), pp. 1162-1167

13 M.M. Othman, A.Z. Ismael, G.E. Hammouda The impact of timing of maximal crystalloid hydration on early graft function during kidney transplantation Anesth Analg., 110 (2010), pp. 1440-1446

14 I. Boutron, D.G. Altman, D. Moher, et al. CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts Ann Intern Med, 167 (2017), pp. 40-47

15 M. Cavaleri, M. Veroux, F. Palermo Perioperative goal-directed therapy during kidney transplantation: an impact evaluation on the major postoperative complications J Clin Med., 8 (2019), p. 80

16 M. Tóth, V. Réti, T. Gondos Effect of recipients’ perioperative parameters on the outcome of kidney transplantation Clin Transplant., 12 (1998), pp. 511-517

17 L. Campos, B. Parada, F. Furriel Do intraoperative hemodynamic factors of the recipient influence renal graft function? Transplant Proc., 44 (2012), pp. 1800-1803

18 P.E. Marik, M. Baram, B. Vahid Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares Chest., 134 (2008), pp. 172-178

19 V. Baxi, A. Jain, D. Dasgupta Anaesthesia for renal transplantation: An Update Indian J Anaesth., 53 (2009), pp. 139-147

20 D. Corbella, P.J. Toppin, A. Ghanekar Cardiac output-based fluid optimization for kidney transplant recipients: a proof-of-concept trial Can J Anaesth., 65 (2018), pp. 873-883

5ed011540e88254d39e6aafa rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections