Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2017.03.002
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Influence of perfusion status on central and mixed venous oxygen saturation in septic patients

Influência do status perfusional nas saturações venosas de oxigênio central e mista em pacientes sépticos

Simone Harumi Goto; Bruno Franco Mazza; Flávio Geraldo Resende Freitas; Flávia Ribeiro Machado

Downloads: 0
Views: 681

Abstract

Abstract Background and objectives Although there is controversy regarding the role of venous oxygen saturation in the initial resuscitation of septic patients with hypoperfusion these markers are still widely used. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation and concordance between central (SvcO2) and mixed (SvO2) oxygen saturation in septic shock patients with or without hypoperfusion in addition to the impact of these differences in patient conduction. Methods Patients with septic shock were monitored with pulmonary artery catheter and the following subgroups of hypoperfusion were analyzed: 1) lactate > 28 mg.dL-1; 2) base excess ≤ -5 mmol.L-1; 3) venoarterial CO2 gradient > 6 mmHg; 4) SvO2 < 65%; 5) SvcO2 < 70%; 6) lactate > 28 mg.dL-1 and SvO2 < 70%; 7) lactate > 28 mg.dL-1 and SvcO2 < 75%. Results Seventy-seven samples from 24 patients were included. There was only a moderate correlation between SvO2 and SvcO2 (r = 0.72, p = 0.0001) and there was no good concordance between these variables (7.35% bias and 95% concordance limits of -3.0% to 17.7%). Subgroup analysis according to the presence of hypoperfusion showed no differences in concordance between variables. There was discordance regarding clinical management in 13.8% (n = 9) of the cases. Conclusions There is a moderate correlation between SvO2 and SvcO2; however, the concordance between them is inadequate. It was not possible to demonstrate that the presence of hypoperfusion alters the concordance between SvO2 and SvcO2. The use of SvO2 instead of SvcO2 may lead to changes in clinical management in a small but clinically relevant portion of patients.

Keywords

Sepsis, Venous oxygen saturation, Mixed oxygen saturation

Resumo

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos Embora haja controvérsias sobre o papel das saturações venosas de oxigênio na ressuscitação inicial do paciente séptico com hipoperfusão, esses marcadores são ainda bastante usados. Este estudo procurou avaliar a correlação e a concordância entre as saturações venosas central (SvcO2) e mista (SvO2) de oxigênio em pacientes com choque séptico, na presença ou não de hipoperfusão, além do impacto dessas diferenças na condução clínica do paciente. Métodos Foram incluídos pacientes com choque séptico monitorados com cateter de artéria pulmonar e analisados os seguintes subgrupos de hipoperfusão: 1) Lactato > 28 mg.dL-1; 2) Excesso de bases ≤ -5 mmoL.L-1; 3) Gradiente venoarterial de CO2 > 6 mmHg; 4) SvO2 < 65%; 5) SvcO2 < 70%; 6) Lactato > 28 mg.dL-1 e SvO2 < 70%; 7) Lactato > 28 mg.dL-1 e SvcO2 < 75%. Resultados Foram incluídas 70 amostras de 24 pacientes. Houve apenas correlação moderada entre SvO2 e SvcO2 (r = 0,72; p = 0,0001) e não houve boa concordância entre essas variáveis (viés de 7,35% e limites de concordância de 95% de -3,0%-17,7%). A análise dos subgrupos de acordo com a presença de hipoperfusão não mostrou diferenças na concordância entre as variáveis. Houve discordância na conduta clínica em 13,8% dos casos (n = 9). Conclusões Existe correlação moderada entre SvO2 e SvcO2, entretanto a concordância entre elas é inadequada. Não foi possível demonstrar que a presença de hipoperfusão altera a concordância entre a entre SvO2 e SvcO2. O uso da SvO2 em vez da SvcO2 pode levar a alterações na conduta clínica numa parcela pequena, porém clinicamente relevante, dos pacientes.

Palavras-chave

Sepse, Saturação venosa de oxigênio, Saturação mista de oxigênio

References

Friedman G, Silva E, Vincent JL. Has the mortality of septic shock changed with time?. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:2078-86.

Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303-10.

Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1546-54.

Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC. Severe sepsis epidemiology: sampling, selection, and society. Crit Care. 2004;8:222-6.

Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1244-50.

Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368-77.

Investigators ProCESS, Yealy DM, Kellum JA. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1683-93.

Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1496-506.

Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS. Protocolised Management In Sepsis (ProMISe): a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early, goal-directed, protocolised resuscitation for emerging septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1301-11.

Phua J, Koh Y, Du B. Management of severe sepsis in patients admitted to Asian intensive care units: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;342:d3245.

Beale R, Reinhart K, Brunkhorst FM. Promoting Global Research Excellence in Severe Sepsis (PROGRESS): lessons from an international sepsis registry. Infection. 2009;37:222-32.

. .

Marx G, Reinhart K. Venous oximetry. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:263-8.

ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepse. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:864-74.

Richard C, Warszawski J, Anguel N. Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:2713-20.

Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT. Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2213-24.

Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:472-7.

Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580-637.

The effect of early goal-directed therapy on treatment of critical patients with severe sepsis/septic shock: a multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2010;6:331-4.

Chawla LS, Zia H, Gutierrez G. Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Chest. 2004;126:1891-6.

Varpula M, Karlsson S, Ruokonen E. Mixed venous oxygen saturation cannot be estimated by central venous oxygen saturation in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1336-43.

Van Beest PA, van Ingen J, Boerma EC. No agreement of mixed venous and central venous saturation in sepsis, independent of sepsis origin. Crit Care. 2010;14:R219.

Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P. A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1025-32.

5dcc61f00e8825b232bf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections