Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2016.08.005
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

YouTube as an information source of spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia and combined spinal and epidural anesthesia

YouTube como fonte de informação de raquianestesia, anestesia peridural e anestesia combinada raquiperidural

Serkan Tulgar; Onur Selvi; Talat Ercan Serifsoy; Ozgur Senturk; Zeliha Ozer

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2016.08.005 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.67, n5, p.493-499, 2017
PDF English
PDF Português
Downloads: 0
Views: 776

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Social media as YouTube have become a part of daily life and many studies evaluated health-related YouTube videos. Our aim was to evaluate videos available on YouTube for the conformity to textbook information and their sufficiency as a source for patient information. Material and method A search of the YouTube website was performed using the keywords "spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, combined spinal epidural anesthesia". Firstly, 180 videos were evaluated and the characteristics of the video were noted, and the features of the video too were noted if the video was regarding neuraxial anesthesia. Questionnaire 1 (Q1) evaluating the video quality relating to neuraxial anesthesia was designed using a textbook as reference and questionnaire 2 (Q2) was designed for evaluating patient information. Results After exclusions, 40 videos were included in the study. There was no difference in Q1 or Q2 scores when videos were grouped into 4 quarters according to their appearance order, time since upload or views to length rate (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference between Q1 or Q2 scores for spinal, epidural or combined videos (p > 0.05). Videos prepared by a healthcare institute have a higher score in both Questionnaires 1 and 2 (10.87 ± 4.28 vs. 5.84 ± 2.90, p = 0.044 and 3.89 ± 5.43 vs. 1.19 ± 3.35, p = 0.01 respectively). Conclusion Videos prepared by institutes, societies, etc. were of higher educational value, but were still very lacking. Videos should be prepared in adherence to available and up-to-date guidelines taking into consideration appropriate step by step explanation of each procedure, patient safety and frequently asked questions.

Keywords

Youtube, Anesthesia, Spinal, Epidural

Resumo

Resumo Introdução As mídias sociais como o YouTube tornaram-se uma parte do cotidiano e muitos estudos avaliaram vídeos do YouTube relacionados à saúde. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar os vídeos disponíveis no YouTube para identificar a existência de conformidade com as informações em livros didáticos e sua suficiência como fonte de informação para o paciente. Material e método Uma pesquisa no site YouTube foi feita com as palavras-chave spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (raquianestesia, anestesia peridural, anestesia combinada raquiperidural). Em primeiro lugar, avaliamos 180 vídeos e observamos suas características e se eram referentes à anestesia neuraxial. O questionário de avaliação da qualidade do vídeo (Q1) relativa à anestesia neuraxial foi criado com um livro didático como referência e o questionário 2 (Q2) foi criado para avaliar as informações ao paciente. Resultados Após exclusões, 40 vídeos foram incluídos no estudo. Não houve diferença nos escores de Q1 ou Q2 quando os vídeos foram agrupados em quatro categorias de acordo com a ordem de aparecimento, tempo de upload ou taxa de tempo de visualização (p > 0,05). Não houve diferença estatística entre os escores de Q1 ou Q2 para os vídeos raquianestesia, peridural ou combinada (p > 0,05). Os vídeos preparados por um instituto de saúde obtiveram escores mais elevados em ambos Q1 e Q2 (10,87 ± 4,28 vs. 5,84 ± 2,90, p = 0,044 e 3,89 ± 5,43 vs. 1,19 ± 3,35, p = 0,01, respectivamente). Conclusão Os vídeos elaborados por institutos, sociedades etc. apresentaram um valor educativo maior, mas ainda muito incompleto. Os vídeos devem ser preparados em conformidade com as diretrizes atualizadas e disponíveis, com explicações adequadas e detalhadas sobre cada procedimento, segurança do paciente e perguntas mais frequentes.

Palavras-chave

YouTube, Anestesia, Raquidiana, Peridural

References

Ho M, Stothers L, Lazare D. Evaluation of educational content of YouTube videos relating to neurogenic bladder and intermittent catheterization. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9:320-54.

Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2015.

Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2015.

Gupta HV, Lee RW, Raina SK. Analysis of YouTube as a source of information for peripheral neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2016;53:27-31.

Taylor T. TF-6 the use of social media in emergency medical resident education. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64:S146.

Arnbjörnsson E, Einar A. The use of social media in medical education: a literature review. Creative Educ. 2014;05:2057-61.

Rabee R, Najim M, Sherwani Y. YouTube in medical education: a student's perspective. Med Educ Online. 2015;20:29507.

Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V. Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2013;19:373-6.

Salem J, Borgmann H, Murphy DG. Integrating social media into urologic health care: what can we learn from other disciplines?. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17:13.

Alotaibi NM, Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F. The current use of social media in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2015.

Yıldırım B, Basaran O, Alatas OD. Chest tube insertion techniques on YouTube: is social media a reliable source of learning medical skills?. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33:1709-10.

Duncan I, Yarwood-Ross L, Haigh C. YouTube as a source of clinical skills education. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:1576-80.

Murugiah K, Vallakati A, Rajput K. YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2011;82:332-4.

Sacchetti P, Zvara P, Plante MK. The internet and patient education-resources and their reliability: focus on a select urologic topic. Urology. 1999;53:1117-20.

Haymes AT. The quality of rhinoplasty health information on the internet. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:143-9.

Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes JD. Consumer use of "Dr Google": a survey on health information-seeking behaviors and navigational needs. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e288.

Rössler B, Lahner D, Schebesta K. Medical information on the internet: quality assessment of lumbar puncture and neuroaxial block techniques on YouTube. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:655-8.

Camm CF, Sunderland N, Camm AJ. A quality assessment of cardiac auscultation material on YouTube. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36:77-81.

Gupta N, Sandhu G, Aggarwal A. Quality assessment of YouTube videos as a source of information on Colonoscopy. Abdomen. 2015;2.

Brooks FM, Lawrence H, Jones A. YouTube™ as a source of patient information for lumbar discectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96:144-6.

Vozenilek J, Huff JS, Reznek M. See one, do one, teach one: advanced technology in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1149-54.

Zahiri HR, Park AE, Pugh CM. "See one, do one, teach one": inadequacies of current methods to train surgeons in hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2867-72.

Turnbull JH, Aleshi P. Spinal and epidural anesthesia. Basic clinical anesthesia. 2015:211-31.

Brown DL. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. Miller's anesthesia. 2010:1611-38.

Drasner K, Larson MD. Spinal and epidural anesthesia. Basics of anesthesia. 2011:252-83.

Campbell JP, Plaat F, Checketts MR. Safety guideline: skin antisepsis for central neuraxial blockade. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:1279-86.

Checketts MR. Wash & go-but with what? Skin antiseptic solutions for central neuraxial block. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:819-22.

Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Itani KMF. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:18-26.

Saha S. Antiseptic solutions for central neuraxial blockade: which concentration of chlorhexidine to use?. Br J Hosp Med. 2014;75:298.

Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J. Online curves: a quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube. Spine. 2015;40:1857-61.

Sorensen JA, Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. YouTube as an information source for pediatric adenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:65-70.

Butler DP, Perry F, Shah Z. The quality of video information on burn first aid available on YouTube. Burns. 2013;39:856-9.

Stellefson M, Chaney B, Ochipa K. YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2014;11:61-71.

Hansen C, Interrante JD, Ailes EC. Assessment of YouTube videos as a source of information on medication use in pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25:35-44.

Güneş T, Serinken M, Alur İ. YouTube as a source of information on varicose veins. Phlebology. 2015.

Gonzalez-Estrada A, Cuervo-Pardo L, Ghosh B. Popular on YouTube: a critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36:121-6.

Lee JS, Seo HS, Hong TH. YouTube as a potential training method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015;89:92-7.

Topps D, Helmer J, Ellaway R. YouTube as a platform for publishing clinical skills training videos. Acad Med. 2013;88:192-7.

5dcd3b530e8825f713bf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections