Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2016.06.001
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study

Comparação de diferentes estiletes usados para intubação com o videolaringoscópio C-MAC D-Blade®: um estudo randômico e controlado

Dilek Ömür; Baş; ak Bayram; Ş; ule Özbilgin; Volkan Hancı; ; Bahar Kuvaki

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2016.06.001 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.67, n5, p.450-456, 2017
PDF English
PDF Português
Downloads: 0
Views: 978

Abstract

Abstract Objective The angle of the C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope, which is used for difficult airway interventions, is not compatible with routinely used endotracheal tubes. Methods A prospective randomized crossover study was performed comparing five intubation methods for use with standardized airways, including using different stylets or no stylet: Group HS, hockey-stick stylet; Group DS, D-blade type stylet; Group CS, CoPilot® videolaryngoscope rigid stylet®; Group GEB, gum elastic bougie; and Group NS, no stylet. A manikin was used to simulate difficult intubation with a Storz C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope. The duration of each intubation stage was evaluated. Results Participants in this study (33 anesthesiology residents and 20 anesthesiology experts) completed a total of 265 intubations. The number of attempts made using no stylet was significantly greater than those made for the other groups (p < 0.05 for group NS- group GEB, group NS- group DS, group NS- group CS and group NS- group HS). The duration to pass the vocal cords significantly differed among all groups (p < 0.001). The total intubation duration was shortest when using D-blade stylet, CoPilot stylet and hockey stick stylet. Although no difference was observed between stylet groups, a significant difference was found between each of these three and no stylet and gum elastic bougie (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Use of the correct stylet leads to a more efficient use of the Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. In our study, the use of the D-blade stylet, the CoPilot stylet and the hockey stick stylet provided quicker intubation, allowed easier passage of the vocal cords, and decreased the total intubation duration. To confirm the findings of our study, randomized controlled human studies are needed.

Keywords

C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscopy, Intubation, Stylet, Manikin

Resumo

Resumo Objetivo O ângulo do videolaringoscópio C-D-MAC Blade®, usado para intervenções em via aérea difícil, não é compatível com os tubos endotraqueais rotineiramente usados. Métodos Um estudo prospectivo, randômico e cruzado foi conduzido para comparar cinco métodos de intubação em modelo de via aérea, com o uso de diferentes estiletes em cinco grupos: taco de Hockey; D-blade; CoPilot VL® rígido; Gum Elastic Bougie e controle (sem estilete). Um manequim foi utilizado para simular intubação difícil com o laringoscópio Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. Foi avaliada a duração de cada fase de intubação. Resultados Os participantes deste estudo (33 residentes de anestesiologia e 20 especialistas em anestesiologia) concluíram 265 intubações no total. O número de tentativas realizadas sem estilete foi significativamente maior que o dos outros grupos (p < 0,05 para SE-GEB, SE-DB, SE-CP e SE-HS). O tempo para passar pelas cordas vocais foi significativamente diferente entre todos os grupos (p < 0,001). O tempo total de intubação foi menor com o uso de D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey. Embora não tenha havido diferença entre D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey, uma diferença significativa foi observada entre cada um desses três e os grupos sem estilete e Gum Elastic Bougie (p < 0,05 e p < 0,001, respectivamente). Conclusão A escolha do estilete certo leva ao uso mais eficiente do videolaringoscópio Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. Em nosso estudo, o uso do D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey proporcionou intubação mais rápida, facilitou a passagem pelas cordas vocais e diminuiu o tempo total de intubação. Para confirmar os resultados de nosso estudo, estudos controlados e randômicos com humanos são necessários.

Palavras-chave

Videolaringoscópio C-MAC D-Blade®, Intubação, Estilete, Manequim

References

Burkle CM, Walsh MT, Harrison BA. Airway management after failure to intubate by direct laryngoscopy: outcomes in a large teaching hospital. J Anaesth. 2005;52:634-40.

Kheterpal S, Healy D, Aziz MF. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1360-9.

McKeen DM, George RB, O’Connell CM. Difficult and failed intubation: incident rates and maternal, obstetrical, and anesthetic predictors. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:514-24.

Budde AO, Desciak M, Reddy V. The prediction of difficult intubation in obese patients using mirror indirect laryngoscopy: a prospective pilot study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29:183-6.

Walls RM, Brown 3rd CA, Bair AE. Emergency airway management: a multi-centerreport of 8937 emergency department intubations. J Emerg Med. 2011;41:347.

Dieck T, Koppert W. Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology - part 9. Recommendations for clinical airway management organisation. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2013;48:600-7.

Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:251-70.

Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V. First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:382-5.

Xue FS, Liao X, Yuan YJ. Rational design of end-points to evaluate performance of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:203.

Cavus E, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:473-7.

McElwain J, Malik MA, Harte BH. Determination of the optimal stylet strategy for the C-MAC videolaryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:369-78.

Behringer EC, Kristensen MS. Evidence for benefit vs novelty in new intubation equipment. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(Suppl. 2):57-64.

Al-Qasmi A, Al-Alawi W, Malik AM. Assessment of Truflex articulating stylet versus conventional rigid Portex stylet as an intubation guide with the D-Blade of C-MAC videolaryngoscope during elective tracheal intubation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:298.

Gupta AK, Sharma B, Kumar A. Improvement in Cormack and Lehane grading with laparoscopic assistance during tracheal intubation. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55:508-12.

Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:121-9.

Jain D, Dhankar M, Wig J. Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury - a manikin study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014;64:269-77.

Batuwitage B, McDonald A, Nishikawa K. Comparison between bougies and stylets for simulated tracheal intubation with the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014:26.

Levitan RM, Pisaturo JT, Kinkle WC. Stylet bend angles and tracheal tube passage using a straight-to-cuff shape. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:1255-8.

Jones PM, Loh FL, Youssef HN. A randomized comparison of the GlideRite(®) Rigid Stylet to a malleable stylet for orotracheal intubation by novices using the GlideScope(®). Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:256-61.

John M, Ahmad I. Preloading bougies during videolaryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:111-2.

Rai MR. The humble bougie…forty years and still counting?. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:199-203.

5dcc6cdf0e8825dc54bf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections