Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2015.08.015
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Effects of different levels of end-expiratory pressure on hemodynamic, respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Efeitos de diferentes níveis de pressão expiratória final sobre a hemodinâmica, mecânica respiratória e resposta sistêmica ao estresse durante colecistectomia laparoscópica

Oznur Sen; Yasemin Erdogan Doventas

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2015.08.015 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.67, n1, p.28-34, 2017
PDF English
PDF Português
Downloads: 0
Views: 598

Abstract

Abstract Objective: General anesthesia causes reduction of functional residual capacity. And this decrease can lead to atelectasis and intrapulmonary shunting in the lung. In this study we want to evaluate the effects of 5 and 10 cmH2O PEEP levels on gas exchange, hemodynamic, respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: American Society of Anesthesiologist I-II physical status 43 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly selected to receive external PEEP of 5 cmH2O (PEEP 5 group) or 10 cmH2O PEEP (PEEP 10 group) during pneumoperitoneum. Basal hemodynamic parameters were recorded, and arterial blood gases (ABG) and blood sampling were done for cortisol, insulin and glucose level estimations to assess the systemic stress response before induction of anesthesia. Thirty minutes after the pneumoperitoneum, the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were recorded again and ABG and sampling for cortisol, insulin, and glucose levels were repeated. Lastly hemodynamic parameters were recorded; ABG analysis and sampling for stress response levels were taken after 60 minutes from extubation. Results: There were no statistical differences between the two groups about hemodynamic and respiratory parameters except mean airway pressure (P mean). P mean, compliance and PaO2; pH values were higher in 'PEEP 10 group'. Also, PaCO2 values were lower in 'PEEP 10 group'. No differences were observed between insulin and lactic acid levels in the two groups. But postoperative cortisol level was significantly lower in 'PEEP 10 group'. Conclusion: Ventilation with 10 cmH2O PEEP increases compliance and oxygenation, does not cause hemodynamic and respiratory complications and reduces the postoperative stress response.

Keywords

PEEP, Hemodynamic, Respiratory mechanics and stress response

Resumo

Resumo Objetivo: A anestesia geral causa a redução da capacidade residual funcional e essa diminuição pode levar à atelectasia pulmonar e ao shunt intrapulmonar. Neste estudo pretendemos avaliar os efeitos de níveis de 5 e 10 cmH2O de pressão expiratória final positiva (PEEP) sobre as trocas gasosas, a hemodinâmica, a mecânica respiratória e a resposta ao estresse sistêmico em colecistectomia laparoscópica. Método: Foram selecionados aleatoriamente 43 pacientes, estado físico ASA I-II, agendados para colecistectomia laparoscópica, para receber PEEP a 5 cmH2O (grupo PEEP-5) ou PEEP de 10 cmH2O (grupo PEEP-10) durante o pneumoperitônio. Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos foram registrados, gasometria arterial e coleta de sangue foram feitas para estimativa dos níveis de cortisol, insulina e glicose para avaliar a resposta ao estresse sistêmico antes da indução anestésica. Trinta minutos após o pneumoperitônio, os parâmetros hemodinâmicos e respiratórios foram registrados novamente e gasometria e amostragem para os níveis de cortisol, insulina e glicose foram repetidos. E os últimos parâmetros hemodinâmicos foram registrados, análise e amostragem de gasometria para os níveis de resposta ao estresse foram feitas após 60 minutos da extubação. Resultados: Não houve diferença estatística entre dois grupos quanto aos parâmetros hemodinâmicos e respiratórios, exceto pressão média das vias aéreas (Pmédia). Os valores de Pmédia, complacência, PaO2 e do pH foram maiores no grupo PEEP-10. Também os valores de PaCO2 foram menores no grupo PEEP-10. Não foram observadas quaisquer diferenças entre os níveis de insulina e de ácido láctico nos dois grupos. Porém, o nível de cortisol no pós-operatório foi significativamente menor no grupo PEEP-10. Conclusão: Ventilação com PEEP de 10 cmH2O aumenta a complacência e a oxigenação, não causa hemodinâmica e complicações respiratórias e reduz a resposta ao estresse no pós-operatório.

Palavras-chave

PEEP, Hemodinâmica, Mecânica respiratória e resposta ao estresse

References

Meninger D, Byhahn C, Westphal K. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:778-83.

Lumb AB, Nunn JF. Respiratory function and ribcage contribution to ventilation in body position commonly used during anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1991;73:422-6.

Hardman JG, Artkenhead AR. Estimating alveolar dead space from the alveolar to end-tidal CO2 gradient: a modeling analysis. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1845-51.

Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. The effects of anesthesia and muscle paralysis on the respiratory system. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1327-35.

Petrucci N, De Feo C. Lung protective strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD003844.

Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308:1651-9.

Terragni PP, Rosboch G, Tealdi A. Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:160-6.

Russo A, Marana E, Viviani D. Diastolic function: the influence of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:923-7.

Karsten J, Luepschen H, Grossherr M. Effect of PEEP on regional ventilation during laparoscopic surgery monitored by electrical impedance tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:878-86.

Hyun JK, Sun KP, Kyung CL. High positive end-expiratory pressure preserves cerebral oxygen saturation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under propofol anesthesia. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:415-20.

Pankaj K, Yamini S, Ravishankar M. Cardiorespiratory effects of balancing PEEP with intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24:232-9.

Fabiona TB, Aldemar AC, Celio FS. Postoperative end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014.

High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384:495-503.

Auler JOC, Carmona MJC, Barbas CV. The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory system mechanics and hemodynamics in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33:31-42.

Daniel LB, Vinicius JSN, Thiago EPB. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on mechanical ventilation duration after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20:773-7.

Hee JL, Kyo SK, Ji SJ. Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;65:244-50.

Andrea R, Enrico DS, Alessandro S. Positive end-expiratory pressure during laparoscopy: cardiac and respiratory effects. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25:314-20.

Julien B, Cecilia M, Philippe JC. Impact of extraperitoneal dioxide carbon insufflation on respiratory function in anesthetized adults: a preliminary study using electrical impedance tomography and wash-out/wash-in technic. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5:e22845.

Meier T, Lange A, Papenberg H. Pulmonary cytokine responses during mechanical ventilation of noninjured lungs with and without end-expiratory pressure. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1265-75.

Weingarten TN, Whalen FX, Warner DO. Comparison of two ventilator strategies in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:16-22.

5dcd9ec90e88251f6ebf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections