Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2015.01.003
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Evaluation of the effects of intra-arterial sugammadex and dexmedetomidine: an experimental study

Avaliação dos efeitos de sugamadex e dexmedetomidina intra-arterial: estudo experimental

Volkan Hancı; ; Ş; ule Özbilgin; Seda Özbal; Gonca Kamacı; ; Hasan Ateş; ; Nilay Boztaş; ; Bekir Uğ; ur Ergür; Ahmet Arı; kanoğ; lu; Osman Yı; lmaz; Bülent Serhan Yurtlu

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2015.01.003 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.66, n5, p.456-464, 2016
PDF English
PDF Português
Downloads: 0
Views: 712

Abstract

Abstract Background: Intra-arterial injection of medications may cause acute and severe ischemia and result in morbidity and mortality. There is no information in the literature evaluating the arterial endothelial effects of sugammadex and dexmedetomidine. The hypothesis of our study is that sugammadex and dexmedetomidine will cause histological changes in arterial endothelial structure when administered intra-arterially. Methods: Rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups. Group Control (n = 7); no intervention performed. Group Catheter (n = 7); a cannula inserted in the central artery of the ear, no medication was administered. Group Sugammadex (n = 7); rabbits were given 4 mg/kg sugammadex into the central artery of the ear, and Group Dexmedetomidine (n = 7); rabbits were given 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine into the central artery of the ear. After 72 h, the ears were amputated and histologically investigated. Results: There was no significant difference found between the control and catheter groups in histological scores. The endothelial damage, elastic membrane and elastic fiber damage, smooth muscle hypertrophy and connective tissue increase scores in the dexmedetomidine and sugammadex groups were significantly higher than both the control and the catheter groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference found between the dexmedetomidine and sugammadex groups in histological scores. Conclusion: Administration of sugammadex and dexmedetomidine to rabbits by intra-arterial routes caused histological arterial damage. To understand the histological changes caused by sugammadex and dexmedetomidine more clearly, more experimental research is needed.

Keywords

Sugammadex, Dexmedetomidine, Intra-arterial, Rabbit, Experimental

Resumo

Resumo Justificativa: A injeção intra-arterial de medicamentos pode causar isquemia aguda e grave e resultar em morbidade e mortalidade. Não há informações na literatura que avaliem os efeitos endoteliais arteriais de sugamadex e dexmedetomidina. A hipótese de nosso estudo foi que dexmedetomidina e sugamadex causariam alterações histológicas na estrutura endotelial arterial quando administrados por via intra-arterial. Método: Os coelhos foram randomicamente divididos em quatro grupos: grupo controle (n = 7), sem intervenção; grupo cateter (n = 7), uma cânula foi inserida na artéria central da orelha e medicamentos não foram administrados; grupo sugamadex (n = 7), receberam 4 mg/kg de sugamadex na artéria central da orelha; grupo dexmedetomidina (n = 7), receberam 1 µg/kg de dexmedetomidina na artéria central da orelha. Após 72 horas, as orelhas foram amputadas e histologicamente examinadas. Resultados: Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos controle e cateter referente aos escores histológicos. Os escores do dano causado ao endotélio e à membrana e fibra elásticas, da hipertrofia do músculo liso e do aumento do tecido conjuntivo foram significativamente maiores nos grupos dexmedetomidina e sugamadex do que nos grupos controle e cateter (p < 0,05). Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos dexmedetomidina e sugamadex nos escores histológicos. Conclusão: A administração de sugamadex e dexmedetomidina a coelhos por via intra-arterial causou danos arteriais histológicos. Para entender as alterações histológicas causadas por sugamadex e dexmedetomidina com mais clareza, estudos experimentais adicionais são necessários.

Palavras-chave

Sugamadex, Dexmedetomidina, Intra-arterial, Coelho, Experimental

References

Hancı V, Yurtlu SB, Bilir S, Ayoğlu H, Demircan N, Turan İÖ. Successful treatment for intra-arterial injection of pheniramine: case report. J Anest Reanim. 2009;7:40-3.

Sen S, Chını EN, Brown JM. Complications after unintentional intra-arterial injection of drugs: risks, outcomes and management strategies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:783-95.

Lake C, Beecroft CL. Extravasation injuries and accidental intra-arterial injection. Crit Care Pain. 2010;10:109-13.

Knill RL, Evans D. Pathogenesis of gangrene following intra-arterial injection of drugs: a new hypothesis. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1975;22:637-46.

Hancı V, Ali Kiraz H, Ömür D, Ekin S, Uyan B, Yurtlu BS. Precipitation in Gallipoli: sugammadex/amiodarone & sugammadex/dobutamine & sugammadex/protamine. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2013;63:163-4.

Ghatak T, Samanta S. Accidental intra-arterial dexmedetomidine injection in postoperative ward. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013;41:431.

Kinmonth JB, Sheppard RC. Accidental injection of thiopentone into arteries: studies of pathology and treatment. Br Med J. 1959;2:914-9.

Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:267-74.

Mirzatolooei F, Afshar A. Intravenous injection of diazepam to cubital vein can be complicated by accidental intra-arterial penetration and gangrene. Arch Iran Med. 2008;11:469-71.

Ghouri AF, Mading W, Prabaker K. Accidental intraarterial drug injections via intravascular catheters placed on the dorsum of the hand. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:487-9.

D’Eramo EM, Bookless SJ, Howard JB. Adverse events with outpatient anesthesia in Massachusetts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:793.

Topazian RG. Accidental intra-arterial injection: a hazard of intravenous medication. J Am Dent Assoc. 1970;81:410.

Keene JR, Buckley KM, Small S, Geldzahler G. Accidental intra-arterial injection: a case report, new treatment modalities, and a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:965-8.

Gori F, Moretti I, Mosca S, Pasqualucci A. Intra-arterial diazepam. Treatment and evaluation of a case. Minerva Anesthesiol. 1991;57:445.

Righini M, Angellillo-Scherrer A, Gueddi S, Le-Gal G, Bounameaux H. Management of severe ischemia of the hand following intraarterial injection. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:219-21.

Seak CK, Kooi XJ, Seak CJ. Acute hand ischemia after intra-arterial injection of meprobamate powder. J Emerg Med. 2012;43:468-71.

Zachary LS, Smith DJ, Heggers JP, Robson MC, Boertman JA, Niu XT, Schileru RE, Sacks RJ. The role of thromboxane in experimental inadvertent intra-arterial drug injections. J Hand Surg. 1987;12A:240-5.

Buckspan GS, Franklın JD, Novak GR, Bennett BD, Lynch JB, Dean RH. Intraarterial drug injury: studies of etiology and potential treatment. J Surg Res. 1978;24:294-301.

Selimoglu O, Basaran M, Ugurlucan M, Ogus TN. Rhabdomyolysis following accidental intra-arterial injection of local anesthetic. Angiology. 2009;60:120-1.

Gould JD, Lingam S. Hazards of intra-arterial diazepam. BMJ. 1977;2:298-9.

Schneider S, Mace JW. Loss of limb following intravenous diazepam. Pediatrics. 1974;53:112-4.

Schulenburg CE, Robbs JV, Rubin J. Intra-arterial diazepam: a report of 2 cases. S Afr Med J. 1985;68:891-2.

Sivalingam P. Inadvertent cannulation of an aberrant radial artery and intra-arterial injection of midazolam [letter]. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999;27:424-5.

Fikkers BG, Wuis EW, Wijnen MH, Scheffer GJ. Intraarterial injection of anesthetic drugs. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:792-4.

Hager DL, Wilson JN. Gangrene of the hand following intra-arterial injection. Arch Surg. 1967;94:86-9.

Hodges RJ. Gangrene of forearm after intra-muscular chlorpromazine. BMJ. 1959;2:918-9.

MacPherson RD, McLeod LJ, Grove AJ. Intra-arterial thiopentone is directly toxic to vascular endothelium. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67:546-52.

Angel MF, Amiss EC, Amiss LR, Morgan RF. Deleterious effect of urokinase used to treat experimental intra-arterial thiopental injection injuries. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;28:281-3.

Vangerven M, Delrue G, Brugman E, Cosaert P. A new therapeutic approach to accidental intra-arterial injection of thiopentone. Br J Anaesth. 1989;62:98-100.

Babacan A, Akçabay M, Uluoğlu O, Ozkoçak I, Karadenizli Y. The histopathological comparison of the results of the intra-arterial injections of propofol and thiopentone in rabbits. Mater Med Pol. 1992;24:41-4.

Ozel A, Yavuz H, Erkul I. Gangrene after penicillin injection (a case report). Turk J Pediatr. 1995;37:67-71.

Aghoutane EM, Fezzazi R, Elhaouati R, Boumzebra D. Fingers necrosis after an accidental intra-arterial injection of flucloxacilline: case report. Chir Main. 2011;30:120-2.

Lehavı A, Sandler A, Netzer A, Katz Shaı Y. Vascular injury following accidental intra-arterial injection of clindamycin: adverse drug reaction report. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011;77:468-9.

Fell JN. Intra-arterial injection of tubocuraine and thiopental. BMJ. 1953;1:95-6.

Kessell G, Barker I. Leg ischaemia in an infant following accidental intra arterial administration of atracurium treated with caudal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:1154-6.

Samanta S, Chakraborty N, Samanta S. Accidental intra-arterial injection of paracetamol. Different preparations, different results. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:1-2.

Ohana E, Sheiner E, Gurman GM. Accidental intra-arterial injection of propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999;16:569-70.

ter Schure JM, de Vries TW. Accidental intra-arterial injection of adenosine in a patient with supraventricular tachycardia. Cardiol Young. 2011;21:601.

Jain A, Sahni N, Banik S, Solanki SL. Accidental intraarterial injection of neostigmine with glycopyrrolate or atropine for reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade: a report of two cases. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:210-1.

Hanci V, Ozbilgin S, Boztaş N, Yurtlu DA, Onat L, Kamacı G, Yurtlu BS, Guneli ME, Şişman AR, Arıkanoğlu A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sugammadex for teophylline/aminophylline intoxication: an experimental study. Lat Am J Pharm. 2014;33:1290-6.

Hanci V, Yurdakan G, Yurtlu S, Turan IÖ, Sipahi EY. Protective effect of dexmedetomidine in a rat model of α-naphthylthiourea-induced acute lung injury. J Surg Res. 2012;178:424-30.

Hanci V, Erdoğan G, Okyay RD, Yurtlu BS, Ayoğlu H, Baydilek Y, Turan IO. Effects of fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol and dexmedetomidine-lidocaine-propofol on tracheal intubation without use of muscle relaxants. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2010;26:244-50.

5dcd666f0e8825f756bf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections