Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.012
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Faster onset time of supraclavicular brachial plexus block using local anesthetic diluted with dextrose

Tempo mais rápido de início do bloqueio do plexo braquial supraclavicular usando anestésico local diluído com dextrose

Hong Jin Lim; Mohd Shahnaz Hasan; Karuthan Chinna

Downloads: 0
Views: 651

Abstract

Abstract Background and objectives: A high sodium concentration is known to antagonize local anesthetics when infiltrated around neural tissue. Thus, we hypothesized that the onset time for sensory and motor blockade, in supraclavicular brachial plexus block using ropivacaine diluted with dextrose would be shorter than with saline. Methods: Patients scheduled for upper limb surgery were randomized to receive ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.5% ropivacaine. Evaluation of sensory and motor blockade was performed every 5 min for 60 min. Patients were followed-up on postoperative day 1, and between days 7 and 10 for the presence of any complications. Twenty-five patients in each group were analyzed. Results: Mean time for onset of analgesia for the dextrose group was 37.6 ± 12.9 min while the mean time for the saline group was 45.2 ± 13.9 min with a p-value of 0.05. The effect size was 0.567, which was moderate to large. No major complications were observed. Conclusion: We conclude that there was a decrease in onset time of analgesia when dextrose was used as a diluent instead of saline for ultrasound guided supraclavicular block.

Keywords

Ultrasound, Supraclavicular, Brachial plexus, Block, Saline, Dextrose

Resumo

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: A alta concentração de sódio é conhecida por antagonizar anestésicos locais quando infiltrado em torno de tecido neural. Portanto, a nossa hipótese foi a de que o tempo de início para os bloqueios sensorial e motor, em bloqueio do plexo braquial supraclavicular com ropivacaína diluída com dextrose, seria menor do que com solução salina. Métodos: Os pacientes agendados para cirurgia em membro superior foram randomizados para receber bloqueio do plexo braquial supraclavicular com ropivacaína a 0,5%g guiado por ultrassom. A avaliação dos bloqueios sensorial e motor foi feita a cada cinco minutos durante 60 minutos. Os pacientes foram acompanhados no pós-operatório no primeiro dia e entre os dias 7-10 para presença de qualquer complicação. Foram analisados 25 pacientes em cada grupo. Resultados: A média do tempo para o início da analgesia no grupo dextrose foi de 37,6 ± 12,9 minutos, enquanto que no grupo solução salina foi de 45,2 ± 13,9 minutos, com um valor-p de 0,05. O tamanho do efeito foi 0,567, o que foi de moderado a grande. Complicações maiores não foram observadas. Conclusão: Concluímos que houve uma redução do tempo de início da analgesia quando dextrose em vez de solução salina foi usada como diluente para bloqueio supraclavicular guiado por ultrassom.

Palavras-chave

Ultrassom, Supraclavicular, Plexo braquial, Bloqueio, Solução salina, Dextrose

References

Heavner JE. Local anesthetics. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2007;20:336-42.

Kanai A, Hoka S. A comparison of epidural blockade produced by plain 1% lidocaine and 1% lidocaine prepared by dilution of 2% lidocaine with the same volume of saline. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1851-5.

Tsui BCH, Kropelin B. The electrophysiological effects of dextrose 5% in water on single shot peripheral nerve stimulation. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1837-9.

Hashimoto K, Sakura S, Bollen AW. Comparative toxicity of glucose and lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:444-50.

Tsui BCH, Kropelin B, Ganapathy S. Dextrose 5% in water: fluid medium for maintaining electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves during stimulating catheter placement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:1562-5.

Dhir S, Tureanu L, Bouzari A. Reduction in sodium content of local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks: a comparative evaluation of saline with 5% dextrose. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:1359-64.

Durlak JA. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34:917-28.

Chinna K, Krishnan K. Biostatistics for the health sciences. 2009.

Perlas A, Lobo G, Lo N. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: outcome of 510 consecutive cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:171-6.

Williams SR, Chouinard P, Arcand G. Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1518-23.

Kapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg. 1994;78:507-13.

Markham A, Faulds D. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in regional anesthesia. Drugs. 1996;52:429-49.

Tran de QH, Russo G, Muñoz L. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary brachial plexus blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:366-71.

Pang TY, Umar RS, Azhar AA. Accident characteristics of injured motorcyclists in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2000;55(1):45-50.

5dcd6e550e88254b7fbf58f3 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections