Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.01.007
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Low-dose levobupivacaine plus fentanyl combination for spinal anesthesia in anorectal surgery

Combinação de levobupivacaína em dose baixa e fentanil para raquianestesia em cirurgia anorretal

Mehtap Honca; Necla Dereli; Emine Arzu Kose; Tevfik Honca; Selcen Kutuk; Selma Savas Unal; Eyup Horasanli

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.01.007 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.65, n6, p.461-465, 2015
PDF English
PDF Português
Downloads: 0
Views: 662

Abstract

BACKGROUND: the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of spinal anesthesia using two different doses of fentanyl combined with low-dose levobupivacaine in anorectal surgery. METHODS: in this prospective, double-blind study, 52 American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II patients scheduled for elective anorectal surgery were randomized into two groups. The patients in group I received intrathecal 2.5 mg hyperbaric levobupivacaine plus 12.5 µg fentanyl and in group II received intrathecal 2.5 mg hyperbaric levobupivacaine plus 25 µg fentanyl. All the patients remained in the seated position for 5 min after completion of the spinal anesthesia. Sensory block was evaluated with pin-prick test and motor block was evaluated with a modified Bromage scale. RESULTS: motor block was not observed in both of the groups. The sensory block was limited to the S2 level in group I, and S1 level in group II. None of the patients required additional analgesics during the operation. Time to two-segment regression was shorter in group I compared with group II (p < 0.01). One patient in group I and 5 patients in group II had pruritus. Hemodynamic parameters were stable during the operation in both of the groups. CONCLUSION: spinal saddle block using hyperbaric levobupivacaine with both 12.5 µg and 25 µg fentanyl provided good quality of anesthesia without motor block for anorectal surgery in the prone position.

Keywords

Hyperbaric levobupivacaine, Fentanyl, Spinal, Anorectal surgery

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA: O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar os efeitos da raquianestesia com o uso de duas doses diferentes de fentanil em combinação com dose baixa de levobupivacaína em cirurgia anorretal. MÉTODOS: Neste estudo prospectivo e duplo-cego, 52 pacientes com estado físico ASA I-II, programados para cirurgia eletiva anorretal, foram randomicamente alocados em dois grupos. Os pacientes do Grupo I receberam 2,5 mg de levobupivacaína hiperbárica mais 12,5 µg de fentanil por via intratecal e os do Grupo II receberam 2,5 mg de levobupivacaína hiperbárica mais 25 µg de fentanil por via intratecal. Todos permaneceram em posição sentada por cinco minutos após o término da raquianestesia. O bloqueio sensorial foi avaliado com o teste da picada de agulha e o bloqueio motor com a escala modificada de Bromage. RESULTADOS: O bloqueio motor não foi observado em ambos os grupos. O bloqueio sensorial limitou-se ao nível S2 no Grupo I e S1 no Grupo II. Nenhum dos pacientes precisou de analgésico suplementar durante a operação. O tempo de regressão de dois seguimentos foi menor no Grupo I em comparação com o Grupo II (p < 0,01). Um paciente do Grupo I e cinco do Grupo II apresentaram prurido. Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos permaneceram estáveis durante a cirurgia em ambos os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: O bloqueio espinhal em sela com o uso de levobupivacaína hiperbárica, tanto com 12,5 µg quanto com 25 µg de fentanil, proporciona boa qualidade de anestesia sem bloqueio motor para cirurgia anorretal em decúbito ventral.

Palavras-chave

Levobupivacaína, Fentanil, Raquianestesia, Cirurgia colorretal

References

Maroof M, Khan RM, Siddique M. Hypobaric spinal anasthe-sia (0. 1%) gives selective sensory block for ano-rectal surgery. Can J Anaesth.. 1995;42:691-4.

Burlacu CL, Buggy DJ. Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine. Ther Clin Risk Manage.. 2008;4:381-92.

Gurbet A, Turker G, Girgin NK. Combination of ultra-low dose bupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia in out-patient anorectal surgery. J Int Med Res.. 2008;36:964-70.

Kazak Z, Ekmekci P, Kazbek K. Hyperbaric levobupivacaine in anal surgery. Anesthetist.. 2010;59:709-13.

Cuvas O, Gulec H, Karaaslan M. The use of low dose plain solutions of local anaesthetic agents for spinal anaesthesia in the prone position: bupivacaine compared with levobupiva-caine. Anaesthesia.. 2009;64:14-8.

Gouveia MA, Imbelloni LE. Understanding spinal anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand.. 2006;50:260.

Povey HM, Jacobsen J, Westergaard-Nielsen J. Subarachnoid analgesia with hyperbaric 0. 5% bupivacaine: effect of a 60-min period of sitting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand.. 1989;33:295-7.

Goel S, Bhardwaj N, Grover VK. Intrathecal fentanyl added to intrathecal bupivacaine for day case surgery: a randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol.. 2003;20:294-7.

Camorcia M, Capogna G, Berritta C. The relative potencies for motor block after intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine. Anesth Analg.. 2007;104:904-7.

Hunt CO, Naulty JS, Bader AM. Perioperative analgesia with subarachnoid fentanyl-bupivacaine for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology.. 1989;71:535-40.

Akerman B, Arweström E, Post C. Local anesthetics potenti-ate spinal morphine antinociception. Anesth Analg.. 1988;67:943-8.

ErBay RH, Ermumcu O, Hancı V. A comparison of spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for transurethral surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol.. 2010;76:992-1001.

Girgin NK, Gurbet A, Turker G. The combination of low-dose levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia in ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Int Med Res.. 2008;36:1287-92.

Simon L, Boulay G, Ziane AF. Effect of injection rate on hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Int J Obes.. 2000;9:10-4.

Gudaityte J, Marhertiene I, Pavalkis D. Minimal effec-tive dose of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine for adult anorectal surgery: a double blind, randomized study. Medicine (Kaunas).. 2005;41:675-84.

Wassef MR, Michaels EI, Rangel JM. Spinal perianal block: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with spinal saddle block. Anesth Analg.. 2007;104:1594-6.

5dcd99c10e88253051bf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections