Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.01.006
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Lidocaine alleviates propofol related pain much better than metoprolol and nitroglycerin

Lidocaína é mais eficaz do que metoprolol e nitroglicerina para o alívio da dor relacionada à injeção de propofol

Asutay Goktug; Handan Gulec; Suna Akin Takmaz; Esra Turkyilmaz; Hulya Basar

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.01.006 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.65, n5, p.338-342, 2015
PDF English
PDF Português
Downloads: 0
Views: 920

Abstract

ABSTRACTBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Injection pain after propofol administration is common and maydisturb patients' comfort. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of intravenous(iv) nitroglycerin, lidocaine and metoprolol applied through the veins on the dorsum of hand orantecubital vein on eliminating propofol injection pain.METHOD: There were 147 patients and they were grouped according to the analgesic adminis-tered. Metoprolol (n = 31, Group M), lidocaine (n = 32, Group L) and nitroglycerin (n = 29, GroupN) were applied through iv catheter at dorsum hand vein or antecubital vein. Pain was evalu-ated by 4 point scale (0 - no pain, 1 --- light pain, 2 --- mild pain, 3 --- severe pain) in 5, 10, 15and 20th seconds. ASA, BMI, patient demographics, education level and the effect of pathwaysfor injection and location of operations were analyzed for their effect on total pain score.RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in terms of total pain score (p = 0.981).There were no differences in terms of total pain score depending on ASA, education level,location of operation. However, lidocaine was more effective when compared with metoprolol(p = 0.015) and nitroglycerin (p = 0.001) among groups. Although neither lidocaine nor metopro-lol had any difference on pain management when applied from antecubital or dorsal hand vein(p > 0.05), nitroglycerin injection from antecubital vein had demonstrated statistically lowerpain scores (p = 0.001).CONCLUSION: We found lidocaine to be the most effective analgesic in decreasing propofolrelated pain. We therefore suggest iv lidocaine for alleviating propofol related pain at operations.

Keywords

Propofol pain, Lidocaine, Nitroglycerin, Metoprolol

Resumo

RESUMOJUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor no local da injeção após a administração de propofol é comum e pode causar desconforto nos pacientes. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a eficácia de nitroglicerina, lidocaína e metoprolol, aplicados intravenosamente através de veias do dorso das mãos ou antecubitais, para eliminar a dor causada pela injeção de propofol.MÉTODOS: Foram alocados em grupos 147 pacientes de acordo com o analgésico administrado: metoprolol (n = 31, Grupo M), lidocaína (n = 32, Grupo L) e nitroglicerina (n = 29, Grupo N). Os analgésicos foram aplicados via cateter intravenoso em veia do dorso da mão ou antecubital. A dor foi avaliada com uma escala de quatro pontos (0 = sem dor, 1 = dor leve, 2 = dor moderada, 3 = dor intensa) nos segundos cinco, 10, 15 e 20. Os dados demográficos dos pacientes, estado físico ASA, IMC, nível de escolaridade, efeito das vias de injeção e local das cirurgias foram analisados quanto a seus efeitos no escore total de dor.RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença entre os grupos em relação ao escore total de dor (p = 0,981). Não houve diferença no escore total de dor em relação ao estado físico ASA, escolaridade e local da cirurgia. No entanto, lidocaína foi mais eficaz em comparação com metoprolol (p = 0,015) e nitroglicerina (p = 0,001), na comparação entre os grupos. Embora lidocaína e metoprolol não tenham apresentado diferença no tratamento da dor quando aplicados em veia antecubital ou do dorso da mão (p > 0,05), a injeção de nitroglicerina em veia antecubital apresentou escores de dor estatisticamente menores (p = 0,001).CONCLUSÃO: Lidocaína mostrou-se como analgésico mais eficaz para diminuir a dor relacionada à injeção de propofol. Sugerimos, portanto, lidocaína IV para aliviar a dor relacionada à injeção de propofol em operações.

Palavras-chave

Dor no local da injeção de propofol, Lidocaína, Nitroglicerina, Metoprolol

References

Lyons B, Lohan D, Flynn C,. Modification of pain on injec- tion of propofol. A comparison of pethidine and lignocaine. Anaesthesia. 1996;5:394-5.

Mangar D, Holak EJ. Tourniquet at 50 mmHg followed by intra- venous lidocaine diminishes hand pain associated with propofol injection. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:250-2.

Shimizu T, Inomata S, Kihara S,. Rapid injection reduces pain on injection with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:394-6.

Grauers A, Liljeroth E, Akeson J. Propofol infusion rate does not affect local pain on injection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:361-3.

Seki S, Sekine R, Aketa K,. Induction of anesthesia with propofol injected through a central catheter. Masui. 1999;48:62-6.

Nathanson MH, Gajraj NM, Russell JA. Prevention of injection of propofol: a comparison of lidocaine with alfentanil. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:469-71.

Wong WH, Cheong KF. Role of tramadol in reducing pain on propofol injection. Singapore Med J. 2001;42:193-5.

Batra YK, Al Qattan AR, Marzouk HM,. Ketamine pretreat- ment with venous occlusion attenuates pain on injection with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:69-70.

Pang WW, Mok MS, Huang S,. The analgesic effect of fen- tanyl, morphine, meperidine, and lidocaine in the peripheral veins: a comparative study. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:382-6.

As¸ık I, Yörüko˘glu D, Gülay I,. Pain on injection of propofol; comparison of metoprolol with lidocaine. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003;20:487-9.

Ambesh SP, Dubey PK, Sinha PK. Ondansetron pretreatment to alleviate pain on propofol injection: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:197-9.

Klement W, Arndt JO. Pain on injection of propofol: effects of concentration and diluent. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67:281-4.

Scott RPF, Saunders DA, Norman J. Propofol: clinical strate- gies for preventing pain on injection. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:492-4.

Eriksson M. Prilocaine reduces injection pain caused by propo- fol. Acta Anaesth Scan. 1995;39:210-3.

Sim JY, Lee SH, Park DY,. Pain on injection with microemul- sion propofol. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67:316-25.

Thomas G, Ramwell PW, Katzung BG. Nitric oxide, donors, and inhibitors. 1998:319-24.

Lauretti GR, Oliveira R, Reis MP,. Transdermal nitroglycerin enhances spinal sufentanil postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:734-9.

Glantz L, Godovic G, Lekar M,. Efficacy of transder- mal nitroglycerin combined with etodolac for the treatment of chronic post-thoracotomy pain: an open-label prospective clinical trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;27:277-81.

Turan A, White PF, Koyuncu O,. Transdermal nicotine patch failed to improve postoperative pain management. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1011-7.

Khanlari B, Linder L, Haefeli WE. Local effect of transdermal isosorbidedinitrate ointment on hand vein diameter. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;57:701-4..

Hashimoto S, Kobayashi A. Clinical pharmacokinetics and phar- macodynamics of glyceryltrinitrate and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42:205-21.

Ferreira SH, Lorenzetti BB, Faccioli LH. Blockade of hyper- algesia and neurogenic edema by topical application of nitroglycerin. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;217:207-9.

Duarte IDC, Lorenzetti BB, Ferreira SH. Peripheral analgesia and activation of the nitric oxide-cyclic GMP pathway. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990;186:289-93.

Lauretti GR, Perez MV, Reis MP,. Double-blind eval- uation of transdermal nitroglycerin as adjuvant to oral morphine for cancer pain management. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:83-6.

5dcdbff90e8825c61bbf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections