Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.10.003
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Comparison of propofol and midazolam on patients undergoing spinal surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: randomized clinical trial

Comparação de propofol e midazolam em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de coluna vertebral com teste de despertar no intraoperatório: estudo clínico randomizado

Ozgur Canbay; Basak Altiparmak; Nalan Celebi; Heves Karagoz; Fatma Saricaoglu

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.10.003 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.65, n6, p.470-475, 2015
PDF English
PDF Português
Downloads: 0
Views: 987

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Instrumentation in correction operations for spinal deformities carries a 0.5-5% risk of injuring the spinal cord. The wake-up test is used for early detection of these injuries. In this study we compared the effects of propofol and midazolam during wake-up test in scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly assigned as group P and group M. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg kg-1 for group P or midazolam 0.5 mg kg-1 for group M with remifentanil 0.5 µg kg-1 and cisatracurium 0.15 mg kg-1 for both groups. At the maintenance of anesthesia O2/air and infusions of remifentanil and cisatracurium were used. In group P, propofol 6-10 mg kg-1 h-1 and in group M, midazolam 0.5 mg mg kg-1 were preferred. Approximately 15 min before the wake-up test, all drugs were discontinued. At the wake-up test, anesthesiologist asked the patients to open their eyes and squeeze his/her hand at every 30 s until the patients responded. Then patients were told to wiggle their toes. Hemodynamic parameters, time of eye-opening, appropriate movement upon verbal command were evaluated. BIS frequency throughout the operation was recorded. RESULTS: The eye opening time was 9 ± 2.15 min in group P and 7 ± 3.15 min in group M. Motor movement time was 12 ± 2.55 min in group P and 21.25 ± 3.93 min in group M. CONCLUSION: Propofol provided better wake-up conditions and conducted a better neurologic assessment within the same BIS values than midazolam.

Keywords

Wake-up test, Propofol, Midazolam, BIS, Spine surgery

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A instrumentação em cirurgias de correção de deformidades da coluna vertebral tem risco de 0,5 a 5% de lesionar a medula espinhal. O teste de despertar é usado para a detecção precoce dessas lesões. Neste estudo comparamos os efeitos de propofol e midazolam durante o teste de despertar em cirurgia de escoliose. MÉTODOS: Trinta pacientes foram designados de forma aleatória para os grupos P e M. A anestesia foi induzida com propofol (2,5 mg kg-1) no grupo P ou midazolam (0,5 mg kg-1) no grupo M, com remifentanil (0,5 µg kg-1) e cisatracúrio (0,15 mg kg-1) em ambos os grupos. A manutenção da anestesia foi feita com O2/ar e infusões de remifentanil e cisatracúrio. Nos grupos P e M, respectivamente, doses de propofol (6-10 mg kg-1 h-1) e de midazolam (0,5 mg mg kg-1) foram preferidas. Aproximadamente 15 min antes do teste de despertar, todos os medicamentos foram interrompidos. No teste de despertar, o anestesiologista pedia ao paciente que abrisse os olhos e apertasse sua mão a cada 30 s até que o paciente respondesse. Depois, o paciente era solicitado a mexer os dedos dos pés. Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos, o tempo de abertura dos olhos e o movimento apropriado sob comando verbal foram avaliados. A frequência do BIS foi registrada durante toda a cirurgia. RESULTADOS: O tempo de abertura dos olhos foi de 9 ± 2,15 min no grupo P e de 7 ± 3,15 min no grupo M. O tempo de movimento motor foi de 12 ± 2,55 min no grupo P e de 21,25 ± 3,93 min no grupo M. CONCLUSÃO: Propofol proporcionou melhores condições de despertar e possibilitou uma melhor avaliação neurológica dentro dos mesmos valores do BIS que midazolam.

Palavras-chave

Teste de despertar, Propofol, Midazolam, BIS, Cirurgia de coluna

References

MacEwen GD, Bunnell WP, Sriram K. Acute neurological complications in the treatment of scoliosis. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am.. 1975;57:404-8.

Wilson-Holden TJ, Padberg AM, Lenke LG, Larson BJ, Brid- well KH, Bassett GS. Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring for pediatric patients with spinal cord pathology undergo- ing spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).. 1999;24:1685-92.

Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, Kanim LE, Sherman JE. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.. 1995;96:6-11.

Wilber RG, Thompson GH, Shaffer JW, Brown RH, Nash Jr CL. Postoperative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instru- mentation. A study using spinal cord monitoring. J Bone Joint Surg Am.. 1984;66:1178-87.

Ashkenaze D, Mudiyam R, Boachie-Adjei O, Gilbert C. Efficacy of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).. 1993;18:1627-33.

Vauzelle C, Stagnara P, Jouvinroux P. Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res.. 1973;93:173-8.

Noonan KJ, Walker T, Feinberg JR, Nagel M, Didelot W, Lindseth R. Factors related to false- versus true-positive neuromonitoring changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).. 2002;27:825-30.

Dorgan JC, Abbott TR, Bentley G. Intra-operative awakening to monitor spinal cord function during scoliosis surgery. Descrip- tion of the technique and report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br.. 1984;66:716-9.

Onaka M, Yamamoto H, Akatsuka M, Mori H. Continuous total intravenous anesthesia is recommended for wake-up test. Masui.. 1999;48:897-9.

Yamaguchi K, Sumitomo M. Anesthetic management with total intravenous anesthesia for intraoperative wake-up test in pedi- atric scoliosis surgery. Masui.. 2010;59:1522-5.

Owen JH. The application of intraoperative monitoring dur- ing surgery for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).. 1999;24:2649-62.

Kawaguchi M, Furuya H. Motor evoked potentials. Masui.. 2006;55:294-301.

Russell D, Wilkes MP, Hunter SC, Glen JB, Hutton P, Kenny GN. Manual compared with target-controlled infusion of propofol. Br J Anaesth.. 1995;75:562-6.

Dogan Z, Senoglu N, Yildiz H. Comparison of enflurane and propofol in electroconvulsive therapy, a randomized crossover open preliminary study on seizure duration and anaesthetic recovery. Rev Bras Anestesiol.. 2011;61:582- 323.

Blusse van Oud-Alblas HJ, Peters JW, de Leeuw TG. A com- parison in adolescents of composite auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during propofol-remifentanil anes- thesia for scoliosis surgery with intraoperative wake-up test. Anesth Analg.. 2008;107:1683-8.

Grottke O, Dietrich PJ, Wiegels S, Wappler F. Intraoperative wake-up test and postoperative emergence in patients under- going spinal surgery: a comparison of intravenous and inhaled anesthetic techniques using short-acting anesthetics. Anesth Analg.. 2004;99:1521-7 (table of contents).

Imani F, Jafarian A, Hassani V, Khan ZH. Propofol-alfentanil vs propofol-remifentanil for posterior spinal fusion including wake-up test. Br J Anaesth.. 2006;96:583-6.

Eroglu A, Uzunlar SM, Ozen HI. Midazolam versus propofol anes- thesia for vertebral column surgery with wake up tests. Turk Anest Rean Cem Mecmuası.. 1999;27:417-22.

Kuruefe R, Ozcan YAB. Comparison of remifentanil and alfen- tanil infusions during scoliosis surgery with wake-up test. Anestezi Dergisi.. 2011;19:99-105.

McCann ME, Brustowicz RM, Bacsik J, Sullivan L, Auble SG, Laussen PC. The bispectral index and explicit recall during the intraoperative wake-up test for scoliosis surgery. Anesth Analg.. 2002;94:1474-8 (table of contents).

Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy vol- unteers. Anesthesiology.. 1997;86:836-47.

Ting CK, Hu JS, Teng YH, Chang YY, Tsou MY, Tsai SK. Desflu- rane accelerates patient response during the wake-up test for scoliosis surgery. Can J Anaesth.. 2004;51:393-7.

5dcd9c020e8825825ebf58f2 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections