Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjan.2013.09.007
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Considerações anestésicas para cistectomia robótica: estudo prospectivo,

Anesthetic considerations for robotic cystectomy: a prospective study,

Menekse Oksar; Ziya Akbulut; Hakan Ocal; Mevlana Derya Balbay; Orhan Kanbak

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2013.09.007 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.64, n2, p.109-115, 2014
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 654

Resumo

Experiência e objetivos: a cistectomia robótica vem rapidamente se tornando parte do repertório cirúrgico de rotina para o tratamento do câncer de próstata. Nosso objetivo foi descrever os desafios respiratórios e hemodinâmicos e as complicações observadas em pacientes de cistectomia robótica. Pacientes: foram prospectivamente recrutados 16 pacientes tratados com cistectomia robótica entre dezembro de 2009 e janeiro de 2011. As medidas de desfecho primário foram monitoração não invasiva, monitoração invasiva e análise de gases sangüíneos feita nas posições supina (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + pneumoperitônio (T2), Trendelenburg antes da dessuflação (T3), Trendelenburg depois da dessuflacão (T4) e supina (T5). Resultados: houve diferencas significativas entre T0 - T1 e T0 - T2 com frequências cardíacas mais baixas. O valor médio para a pressão arterial em T1 foi significativamente mais baixo do que em T0. O valor da pressão venosa central foi significativamente mais elevado em T1, T2, T3 e T4 versus T0. Não foi observada diferença significativa no valor de PET-CO2 em qualquer ponto temporal, em comparação com T0. Também não foram notadas diferenças significativas na frequência respiratória em qualquer ponto temporal, em comparação com T0. Os valores médios de ƒ em T3, T4 e T5 foram significativamente mais elevados versus T0. A ventilação minuto média em T4 e T5 foi significativamente mais elevada versus T0. As pressões de platô e de pico médias em T1, T2, T3, T4 e T5 foram significativamente mais elevadas versus T0. Conclusões: embora a maioria dos pacientes geralmente tolere satisfatoriamente a cistectomia robótica e perceba os benefícios, os anestesiologistas devem levar em consideração as mudanças no sistema cardiopulmonar ocorrentes quando os pacientes são colocados na posição de Trendelenburg e ao ser criado um pneumoperitônio.

Palavras-chave

Cistectomia robótica, Anestesia, Anestesiologista

Abstract

Background and objectives: Robotic cystectomy is rapidly becoming a part of the standard surgical repertoire for the treatment of prostate cancer. Our aim was to describe respiratory and hemodynamic challenges and the complications observed in robotic cystectomy patients. Patients: Sixteen patients who underwent robotic surgery between December 2009 and January 2011 were prospectively enrolled. Main outcome measures were non-invasive monitoring, invasive monitoring and blood gas analysis performed at supine (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + pneumoperitoneum (T2), Trendelenburg-before desufflation (T3), Trendelenburg (after desufflation) (T4), and supine (T5) positions. Results: There were significant differences between T0 - T1 and T0 - T2 with lower heart rates. The mean arterial pressure value at T1 was significantly lower than T0. The central venous pressure value was significantly higher at T1, T2, T3, and T4 than at T0. There was no significant difference in the PET-CO2 value at any time point compared with T0. There were no significant differences in respiratory rate at any time point compared with T0. The mean ƒ values at T3, T4, and T5 were significantly higher than T0. The mean minute ventilation at T4 and T5 were significantly higher than at T0. The mean plateau pressures and peak pressures at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 were significantly higher than the mean value at T0. Conclusions: Although the majority of patients generally tolerate robotic cystectomy well and appreciate the benefits, anesthesiologists must consider the changes in the cardiopulmonary system that occur when patients are placed in Trendelenburg position, and when pneumoperitoneum is created.

Keywords

Robotic cystectomy, Anesthesia, Anesthesiologist

References

Sánchez de Badajoz E, Gallego Perales JL, Reche Rosado A. Laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit: case report. J Endourol. ;9:62-59.

Abdel-Hakim AM, Bassiouny F, Abdel Azim MS. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder. J Endourol. ;16:381-377.

Pruthi RS, Nielsen ME, Nix J. Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases. J Urol. ;183:510-514.

Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology. ;66:101-104.

Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. ;302:1564-1557.

Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int. ;108:1708-1713.

Richards KA, Kader K, Hemal AK. Robotic radical cystectomy: where are we today, where will we be tomorrow?. Sci World J. ;10:2227-2215.

Balick-Weber CC, Nicolas P, Hedreville-Montout M. Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlle vs pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment. Br J Anaesth. ;99:429-435.

Choi EM, Na S, Choi SH. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in steep Trendelenburg position for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. ;23:183-188.

Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. ;104:433-439.

Struthers AD, Cuschieri A. Cardiovascular consequences of laparoscopic surgery. Lancet. ;352:568-570.

Koivusalo AM, Lindgren L. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. ;44:841-834.

Meininger D, Westphal K, Bremerich DH. Effects of posture and prolonged pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic parameters during laparoscopy. World J Surg. ;32:1400-1405.

Meininger D, Byhahn C, Mierdl S. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesio Scand. ;49:778-783.

Leggett RW. A biokinetic model for carbon dioxide and bicarbonate. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. ;108:203-213.

Torrielli R, Cesarini M, Winnock S. Hemodynamic changes during celioscopy: a study carried out using thoracic electric bioimpedance. Can J Anaesth. ;37:46-51.

Walder AD, Aitkenhead AR. Role of vasopressin in the haemodynamic response to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. ;78:266-264.

Joris JL, Chiche JD, Canivet JL. Hemodynamic changes induced by laparoscopy and their endocrine correlates: effects of clonidine. J Am Coll Cardiol. ;32:1396-1389.

Falabella A, Moore-Jeffries E, Sullivan MJ. Cardiac function during steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum for robotic-assisted prostatectomy: a trans-oesophageal Doppler probe study. Int J Med Robot. ;3:312-315.

Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. ;92:236-232.

Pruthi RS, Smith A, Wallen EM. Evaluating the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. J Endourol. ;22:2474-2469.

Lowrance WT, Rumohr JA, Chang SS. Contemporary open radical cystectomy: analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. ;179:1313-1318.

Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee MM. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol. ;57:281-274.

Rhee JJ, Lebeau S, Smolkin M. Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: early prospective evaluation of the impact of robotic assistance. BJU Int. ;98:1059-1063.

Kordan Y, Barocas DA, Altamar HO. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. ;106:1040-1036.

Boström PJ, Kössi J, Laato M. Risk factors for mortality and morbidity related to radical cystectomy. BJU Int. ;103:196-191.

Hazebroek EJ, Bonjer HJ. Effect of patient position on cardiovascular and pulmonary function. The sages perioperative care in minimally invasive surgery. :417-410.

Yee DS, Katz DJ, Godoy G. Extende pelvic lymph node dissection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical technique and initial experience. Urology. ;75:1199-1204.

5dcdb4350e88251e5cbf58f2 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections