Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjan.2013.03.007
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Comparação de levobupivacaína em raquianestesia contínua ou com dose única para cirurgia de ressecção transuretral de próstata

The comparison of levobupivacaine in continuous or single dose spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of prostate surgery

Yunus Baydilek; Bülent Serhan Yurtlu; Volkan Hanci; Hilal Ayoğ; lu; Rahș; an Dilek Okyay; Gulay Erdoğ; an Kayhan; Hüsnü Tokgöz; Görkem Mungan; Iș; il Özkoçak

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2013.03.007 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.64, n2, p.89-97, 2014
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 664

Resumo

Justificativa e objetivo: comparar a eficácia de levobupivacaína na indução de raquianestesia contínua (RAC) versus dose única (Radu) em pacientes programados para ressecção transuretral de próstata (RTUP). Métodos: foram incluídos no estudo 50 pacientes, ≥ 60 anos, ASA I-II ou III. Levobupivacaína a 0,5% (12,5 mg) foi administrada por via intratecal no grupo Radu. No grupo RAC, levobupivacaína a 0,25% (2 mL) foi inicialmente administrada através de cateter espinhal. Para o nível de bloqueio sensorial atingir o dermátomo T10, 1 mL adicional de levobupivacaína a 0,25% foi administrado através do cateter a cada 10 minutos. Os parâmetros hemodinâmicos e as características do bloqueio foram registrados. Amostras de sangue dos pacientes foram coletadas nos períodos pré- e pós-operatórios para determinar os níveis plasmáticos de cortisona e adrenalina. Resultados: a RAC proporcionou melhor estabilidade hemodinâmica em comparação com a Radu, particularmente aos 90 minutos após a administração intratecal. O aumento do nível de bloqueio sensorial foi rápido e o tempo para atingir a anestesia cirúrgica foi menor no grupo Radu. O desenvolvimento do bloqueio motor foi mais rápido no grupo Radu. No grupo RAC, um nível semelhante de anestesia foi obtido com o uso de uma dose mais baixa de levobupivacaína, que foi relacionada à recuperação mais rápida. Embora ambas as técnicas tenham sido eficazes na prevenção da resposta ao estresse cirúrgico, os níveis de cortisona no pós-operatório foram mais suprimidos no grupo Radu. Conclusão: a técnica RAC com levobupivacaína a 0,25% pode ser usada como um método de anestesia regional em pacientes idosos programados para RTUP.

Palavras-chave

Levobupivacaína, Raquianestesia contínua, Raquianestesia, Ressecção transuretral de próstata

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of levobupivacaine induced continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) versus single dose spinal anesthesia (SDSA) in patients who are planned to undergo transurethral prostate resection. Methods: Sixty years or older, ASA I-II or III, 50 patients were included in the study. 12.5 mg 0.5% levobupivacaine were administered intrathecally in SDSA group. In CSA group, initially 2 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine were administered through spinal catheter. In order to achieve sensory block level at T10 dermatome, additional 1 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine were administered through the catheter in every 10 min. Hemodynamic parameters and block characteristics were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative blood samples of the patients were drawn to determine plasma cortisone and plasma epinephrine levels. Results: CSA technique provided better hemodynamic stability compared to SDSA technique particularly 90 min after intrathecal administration. The rise in sensory block level was rapid and the time to reach surgical anesthesia was shorter in SDSA group. Motor block developed faster in SDSA group. In CSA group, similar anesthesia level was achieved by using lower levobupivacaine dose and which was related to faster recovery. Although, both techniques were effective in preventing surgical stress respond, postoperative cortisone levels were suppressed more in SDSA group. Conclusion: CSA technique with 0.25% levobupivacaine can be used as a regional anesthesia method for elderly patients planned to have TUR-P operation.

Keywords

Levobupivacaine, Continuous spinal anesthesia, Spinal anesthesia, Transurethral prostate resection

References

Kayhan Z. Boşaltim Sistemi ve Anestezi, Klinik Anestezi. 3. Baski. Istanbul Logos Yayincilik. ;15:388-405.

Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Genitoüriner Ameliyatlarda Anestezi. Klinik Anesteziyoloji 4 Baski Istanbul Güneş. Tip Kitabevleri Yayincilik. ;33:757-772.

Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett ATK, Peters PC. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications-a cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol. ;167:9-5.

Dobson PM, Caldicott LD, Gerrish SP, Cole JR, Channer KS. Changes in haemodynamic variables during transurethral resection of the prostate: comparison of general and spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. ;72:271-267.

Malhotra V, Sudheendra V, Diwan S. Anesthesia and the renal and genitourinary systems. Miller's anesthesia, vol.54. :2208-2175.

Rassweiler J, Teber D, Rainer KR, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)-incidence. Manage Prevent Eur Urol. ;50:980-969.

Cuvas O, Er AE, Ongen E, Basar H. Spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection operations:bupivacaine versus levobupivacaine. Minerva Anestesiol. ;74:697-701.

Kayhan Z. Lokal/Bölgesel Anestezi Yöntemleri. Klinik Anestezi 3 Baski Istanbul Logos Yayincilik. ;21:524-590.

Bevacqua BK. Continuous spinal anaesthesia: what's new and what's not. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. ;17:393-406.

Denny NM, Selander DE. Continuous spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. ;81:590-597.

Pitkanen M. Continuous spinal anesthesia and analgesia. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manage. ;2:102-96.

Erbüyün K, Ok G, Tekin I. Surekli Spinal ve Epidural Anestezi Yöntemlerinin Anestezik ve Hemodinamik Etkilerinin Karşilaştirilmasi. Firat Tip Dergisi. ;12:201-205.

Yilmazlar A. Kontinu spinal anestezi. Anestezi Dergisi. ;10:12-17.

Sell A, Olkkola KT, Jalonen J, Aantaa R. Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose of isobaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered via a spinal catheter for hip replacement surgery. Br J Anaesth. ;94:239-242.

McLeod GA, Burke D. Levobupivacaine. Anaesthesia. ;56:331-341.

Mc Clellan KJ, Spencer CM. Levobupivacaine. Drugs. ;56:355-362.

Mazoit JX, Boico O, Samii K. Myocardial uptake of bupivacaine: II. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bupivacaine enantiomers in the isolated perfused rabbit heart. Anest Analg. ;77:477-482.

Klimscha W, Weinstabl C, Ilias W, Mayer N, Kashanipour A, Schneider B. Continuous spinal anesthesia with a microcatheter and low-dose bupivacaine decreases the hemodynamic effects of centroneuraxis blocks in elderly patients. Anesth Analg. ;77:280-275.

Biboulet P, Aubas P, Dubourdieu J, Rubenovitch J, Capdevila X, d'Athis F. Fatal and non fatal cardiac arrests related to anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. ;48:326-332.

Biboulet Ph, Deschadt J, Aubas P, Vacher A, Chauvet PH. Continuous spinal anesthesia: does low dose plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine allow the performance of hip surgery in the elderly?. Reg Anesth. ;18:175-170.

Favarel-Garrigues JF, Sztark F, Petitjean ME, Thicoipe M, Lassie P, Dabadie P. Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in the elderly: single dose versus titration through a catheter. Anesth Analg. ;82:312-316.

De Andres J, Beliver J, Baluiches R. Comparison of continuous spinal anaesthesia using a 32 G catheter with anaesthesia using a single 24 G atraumatic needle in young patients. Br J Anaesth. ;73:750-747.

Reisli R, Horasanli E, Demirbilek S, Dikmen B, Yigitbaş B., Gögüş N. Tek doz ve sürekli spinal anestezinin hemodinamik ve anestezik etkilerinin karşilaştirilmasi. Turk Anest Rean Cem Mecmuasi. ;27:26-21.

Labaille T, Benhamou D, Westermann J. Hemodynamic effects of continuous spinal anesthesia: a comparative study between low and high doses of bupivacaine. Reg Anesth. ;17:196-193.

Minville V, Fourcade O, Grousset D, Chassery C, Nguyen L, Asehnoune K. Spinal anesthesia using single injection small-dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Anesth Analg. ;102:1559-1563.

Pitkanen M, Rosenberg P, Silvanto M, Tuominen M. Haemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia with slow continuous infusion or single dose of plain bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. ;36:526-529.

Shenkman Z, Eidelman LA, Cotev S. Continuous spinal anaesthesia using a standard epidural set for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Can J Anaesth. ;44:1042-1046.

Lundorff L, Dich-Nielsen JO, Laugesen H, Jensen MM. Single-dose spinal anaesthesia versus incremental dosing for lower limb vascular surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. ;43:405-410.

Schnider TW, Mueller-Duysing S, Johr M, Gerber H. Incremental dosing versus single-dose spinal anesthesia and hemodynamic stability. Anesth Analg. ;77:1174-1178.

Kehlet H. Modifications of responses to surgery by Neural Blockade. Neural blocked in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. ;5:129-175.

Seitz W, Luebbe N, Bechstein W, Fritz K, Kirchner E. A Comparison of two types of anaesthesia on the endocrine and metabolic responses to anaesthesia and surgery. Europ J Anaesth. ;3:283-294.

Pflug AE, Halter JB. Effect of spinal anesthesia on adrenergic tone and the neuroendocrine responses to surgical stress in humans. Anesthesiology. ;55:120126.

Moller IW, Hjortso E, Krantz T, Wandall E, Kehlet H. The modifying effect of spinal anaesthesia on intra- and postoperative adrenocortical and hyperglycaemic response to surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. ;28:269-266.

5dcdb3ad0e8825325cbf58f2 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections