Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjan.2012.12.008
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Miscellaneous

A máscara laríngea supreme™ pode ser uma opção para a intubação endotraqueal em cirurgia laparoscópica?

Can supremeâ„¢ laryngeal mask airway be an alternative to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery?

Meltem Turkay Aydogmus; Hacer Sebnem Yeltepe Turk; Sibel Oba; Oya Unsal; Sı; tkı; Nadir Sı; nı; koglu

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2012.12.008 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.64, n1, p.66-70, 2014
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 684

Resumo

Justificativa e objetivo: especialistas recomendam a intubação traqueal para o manejo das vias aéreas em procedimentos cirúrgicos laparoscópicos. A máscara laríngea (ML) pode ser uma boa opção à intubação endotraqueal. Nesta série de casos, o nosso objetivo foi analisar o uso damáscara laríngea SupremeTM (MLS) na prática cirúrgica laparoscópica. Métodos: o estudo foi conduzido com 60 pacientes, entre 18 e 60 anos, submetidos à cirurgia laparoscópica. Os valores de saturação periférica de O2 (SpO2) e dióxido de carbono no fim da expiração (EtCO2) foram registrados nos minutos um, 15, 30, 45 e 60. A frequência cardíaca e a pressão arterial média (PAM) dos pacientes também foram registradas. Consideramos o tempo de inserção da MLS; a taxa de aplicabilidade da sonda gástrica; a ocorrência de náusea, vômito, tosse e dor de garganta uma hora após a cirurgia. Resultados: a média inicial de EtCO2 foi menor do que aos 15, 30, 45 e 60 minutos (p < 0,0001) e a média de EtCO2 aos 15 minutos foi menor do que nos outros tempos registrados. Observamos que a frequência cardíaca média inicial foi maior do que as subsequentes à inserção da MLS e as anteriores e posteriores à remoção da MLS. A frequência cardíaca média após a inserção da MLS foi acentuadamente menor do que a anterior à remoção da MLS (p = 0,013). A PAM após a inserção da MLS foi menor do que a inicial e também menor do que as anteriores à remoção da MLS (p = 0,0001). Conclusão: a MLS pode ser uma opção adequada para intubação em procedimentos cirúrgicos laparoscópicos em um grupo seleto de pacientes.

Palavras-chave

Cirurgia, Videolaparoscópica, Equipamentos, Máscara laríngea, Intubação traqueal

Abstract

Background and objectives: In laparoscopic surgical procedures, experts recommend tracheal intubation for airway management. Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) can be a good alternative to intubation. In this case series, we aimed to examine the use of the SupremeTM LMA (SLMA) in laparoscopic surgical practice. Methods: We planned the study for sixty patients between the ages of 18 and 60, who would undergo laparoscopic surgery. We recorded one, 15, 30, 45, and 60-minute peripheral O2 saturation (SpO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) values, heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). We observed the duration of SLMA insertion, the rate of gastric tube applicability, whether nausea, vomiting, and coughing developed, and whether there was postoperative1-hour sore throat. Results: The initial EtCO2 mean was lower than the EtCO2 means of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes (p < 0.0001) and the 15-minute EtCO2 mean was lower than other measured EtCO2 means. We observed the initial heart rate mean to be higher than the ones following the SLMA insertion, prior to the SLMA removal, and after the SLMA removal. The heart rate mean after the SLMA insertion was remarkably lower than the heart rate mean prior to the SLMA removal (p = 0.013).The MAP after the SLMA insertion was lower than the initial MAP means, as well as the MAP averages prior to after the removal of SLMA (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: SLMA can be a suitable alternative to intubation in laparoscopic surgical procedures in a group of selected patients.

Keywords

Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngeal Masks, Laparoscopy

References

Fabregat-Lopez J, Garcia-Rojol B, Cook TM. A case series of the use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in emergency lower abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. ;63:967-971.

Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. ;88:824-827.

Singh M, Bharti R, Kapoor D. Repair of damaged supraglottic airway devices: a novel method. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. ;17(18):33.

Sharma V, Verghese C, McKenna PJ. Prospective audit on the use of the LMA-Supreme for airway management of adult patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in prone position. Br J Anaesth. ;105:232-228.

Ali A, Canturk S, Turkmen A, Turgut N, Altan A. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol. ;26:1014-1010.

Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme-a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth. ;101:405-410.

Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. ;27:607-602.

Ozdamar D, Güvenc BH, Toker K, Solak M, Ekingen G. Comparison of the effect of LMA and ETT on ventilation and intragastric pressure in pediatric laparoscopic procedures. Minerva Anestesiol. ;76:599-592.

Viira D, Myles PS. The use of the laryngeal mask in gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care. ;32:560-563.

Ho BY, Skinner HJ, Mahajan RP. Gastro-oesophageal reflux during day case gynaecological laparoscopy under positive pressure ventilation: laryngeal mask vs. tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. ;53:921-924.

Skinner HJ, Ho BY, Mahajan RP. Gastro-oesophageal reflux with the laryngeal mask during day-case gynaecological laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. ;80:675-676.

Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang1 C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. ;88:824-827.

Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert D, Fick GH. The LMA ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. ;49:857-862.

Carron M, Marchet A, Ori C. Supreme laryngeal mask airway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patient with severe pulmonary fibrosis. Br J Anaesth. ;103:779-778.

Piper SN, Triem JG, Röhm KD, Maleck WH, Schöllhorn TA, Boldt J. ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. ;39:132-137.

Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, Dell'Agnolo P, Bernardini A. Standard laryngeal mask airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. ;15:428-432.

Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. ;37:819-815.

Abdi W, Amathieu R, Adhoum A. Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. ;54:146-141.

Yac T, Yang XL, Zhang F. The feasibility of Supreme laryngeal mask airway in gynecological laparoscopy surgery. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. ;90:2051-2048.

Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme-a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia. ;64:83-79.

Wang B, He KH, Jiang MB, Liu C, Min S. Effect of prophylactic dexamethasone on nausea an vomiting after laparoscopic gynecological operation: meta-analysis. Middle East J Anesthesiol. ;2011:397-402.

Ryu JH, Jeon YT, Hwang JW. Intravenous, oral, and the combination of intravenous and oral ramosetron for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Clin Ther. ;33:1172-1162.

Turkstra TP, Smitheram AK, Alabdulhadi O, Youssef H, Jones PM. The Flex-TipTM tracheal tube does not reduce the incidence of postoperative sore throat: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. ;58:1096-1090.

5dcdc37f0e8825142ebf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections