Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://bjan-sba.org/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjan.2012.07.012
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Sedação controlada pelo paciente em cirurgia ortopédica sob anestesia regional: uma nova abordagem em sedação

Patient-controlled sedation in orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia: a new approach in procedural sedation

Abdulselam Ekin; Ferah Donmez; Vildan Taspinar; Bayazit Dikmen

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2012.07.012 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.63, n5, p.410-414, 2013
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 644

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Anestesia regional é uma técnica de uso comum em procedimentos ortopédicos. A sedação deve reduzir a ansiedade e o medo do paciente e aumentar a qualidade da anestesia regional. Este estudo avaliou as alterações hemodinâmicas, o nível de sedação e de satisfação tanto dos pacientes quanto dos cirurgiões e os potencias efeitos colaterais da sedação controlada pelo paciente com o uso de propofol. MÉTODOS: Selecionamos 60 pacientes, estado físico Asa I-III e agendados para artroplastia total do joelho sob anestesia combinada raqui-peridural. Os pacientes do Grupo P (n = 30) receberam propofol por meio de um dispositivo de analgesia controlada pelo paciente com as seguintes configurações: dose de propofol em bolus de 400 µg.kg-1 por via intravenosa (IV), com intervalo de bloqueio de cinco minutos e sem infusão basal. Os pacientes do Grupo S receberam infusão de solução salina (150 mL), com as mesmas configurações. Para determinar o nível de sedação, o índice bispectral (BIS) e a Escala de Avaliação de Alerta e Sedação dos Observadores (OAA/S) foram usados. O número de solicitações foi registrado para todos os pacientes. Como avaliação final, a satisfação dos cirurgiões e dos pacientes foi registrada em escala de 4 pontos. RESULTADOS: Os valores de BIS e da OAA/S foram menores no Grupo P que no Grupo S. A satisfação dos pacientes foi maior no Grupo P, embora não tenha havido diferença significativa em relação à satisfação dos cirurgiões entre os grupos. O número de solitações de sedação foi significativamente maior no Grupo S. Contudo, a maioria das solicitações não foi considerada bem-sucedida. CONCLUSÃO: Este estudo sugere que a analgesia controlada pelo paciente com o uso de propofol pode ser usada com resultados eficazes em procedimentos ortopédicos.

Palavras-chave

ANESTÉSICOS, Venoso, propofol, SEDAÇÃO, Consciente, TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS, Regional, epidural, subaracnoidea, TÉCNICAS DE ANALGESIA, PCA Analgesia controlada pelo paciente

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Regional anesthesia is a commonly used technique in orthopedic procedures. Sedation should reduce the patient's anxiety and fear while increasing regional anesthesia quality. This study evaluated the hemodynamic changes, level of sedation, both patients' and surgeons' levels of satisfaction and potential side effects in patient-controlled sedation using propofol. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial studied sixty ASA physical class I-III patients scheduled for total knee replacement surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Patients in Group P (n = 30) received propofol via a patient-controlled analgesia device with the following settings: intravenous propofol bolus dose 400 µg.kg_1, 5-minute lockout interval and no basal infusion. In Group S, we infused saline 150 using the same settings. To determine the level of sedation, we used BIS and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation Scale. For all patients, we recorded the number of requests. As the final evaluation, we scored surgeons' and patients' satisfaction on 4-point scales. RESULTS: Both BIS values and OAA/S scores were lower in Group P than in Group S. Patients' satisfaction was higher in Group P, although there was no significant difference with respect to surgeons' satisfaction between the groups. The number of requests for sedation was significantly higher in Group S. However, most requests were considered unsuccessful. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patient-controlled sedation with propofol can be used efficiently in orthopedic procedures.

Keywords

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, Anesthesia, Epidural, Anesthesia, Spinal, Conscious Sedation, Infusion Pump, Propofol

References

Kol Ö. Spinal anestezi altındaki ürolojik endoskopik girişimlerde hasta kontrollü sedasyon uygulamalarının karşılaştırılması. .

Reves GJ, Glass SA, Lubarsky DA. Non-barbiturate intravenous anesthetics. Anesthesia. 1994:269-274.

Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Clinical anesthesia. 2001.

Alhashemi AJ, Kaki AM. Anesthesiologist-controlled versus patient-controlled propofol sedation for shockwave lithotripsy. Can J Anesth. 2006;53(5):449-455.

Gillham MJ, Hutchinson RC, Carter R. Patient-maintained sedation for ERCP with a target-controlled infusion of propofol: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endocs. 2001;54:14-17.

Irwin MG, Thompson N, Kenney GNC. Patient-maintained propofol sedation: assessment of a target-controlled infusion system. Anaesthesia. 1997;54:525-530.

Tripathi M, Nath SS, Chaudhary A. Patient controlled sedation during neuraxial anesthesia. J Postgrad Med. 2009;55(2):108-112.

Urmey WF. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. 1997;1:123-130.

Thorpe SJ, Balakrishnan VR, Cook LB. The safety of patient-controlled sedation. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(12):1144-1150.

Yun MJ, Oh AY, Kim KO. Patient-controlled sedation vs. anaesthetic nurse-controlled sedation for cataract surgery in elderly patients. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(5):776-780.

Singh T, Ravishankar M. Conscious sedation with propofol for surgeries under spinal anaesthesia: anaesthesiologist versus patient controlled. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2005;21(2):169-173.

Crepeau T, Poincloux L, Bonny C. Significance of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005;29:1090-1096.

Wilson E, David A, Mackenzie N. Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam. Br J Anaesth. 1990;64:48-52.

Yaddanapudi S, Batra YK, Balagopal A. Sedation in patient above 60 years of age undergoing urological surgery under spinal anesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam infusions. J Postgrad Med. 2007;53(3):171-175.

Mandel JE, Tanner JW, Lichtenstein GR. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:434-439.

Ganapaty S, Herrick I. Propofol patient-controlled sedation during hip or knee arthroplasty in elderly patients. Can J Anaest. 1997;44(4):385-389.

Ng JM, Kong CF, Nyam D. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:8-13.

Janzen PRM, Christys A, Vucevic M. Patient-controlled sedation using propofol in elderly patients in day-case cataract surgery. Br J of Anaesth. 1999;82(4):635-636.

Nakagawa M, Mammoto T. Midazolam premedication reduces propofol requirements for sedation during regional anesthesia. Can J Anesth. 2000;47(1):47-49.

Lui J, Singh H, White PF. Electroencephalogram bispectral analysis predicts the depth of midazolam-induced sedation. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:64-69.

Glass P, Blomm M, Kearse L. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanyl in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:836-847.

Lui J, Singh H, White PF. Electroencephalographic bispectral index correlates with intraoperative recall and depth of propofol-induced sedation. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:185-189.

Iselin-Chaves IA, Flaishon R, Sebel PS. The effect of the interaction of propofol and alfentanyl on recall, loss of consciousness, and the bispectral index. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:949-955.

5dd3f4dc0e88253a6ac63493 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections