1. Nepogodiev D, Martin J, Biccard B, et al. National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery. Global burden of postoperative death. Lancet. 2019;393:401.

2. Lobo SM, de Oliveira NE. Clinical review: What are the best hemodynamic targets for noncardiac surgical patients? Crit Care. 2013;17:210.

3. Ripolles-Melchor J, Abad-Motos A, Cecconi M, et al. Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and postoperative complications in colorectal surgery in Europe: The EuroPOWER international observational study. J Clin Anesth. 2022;80:110752.

4. Saugel B, Kouz K, Scheeren TWL. The ’5 Ts’ of perioperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123:103−7.

5. Chong MA, Wang Y, Berbenetz NM, et al. Does goal-directed haemodynamic and fluid therapy improve peri-operative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:469−83.

6. Giglio M, Manca F, Dalfino L, et al. Perioperative hemodynamic goal-directed therapy, and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016; 82:1199−213.

7. Messina A, Robba C, Calabro L, et al. Association between peri- operative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2021;25:43.

8. Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, et al. OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311:2181−90. Erratum in: JAMA. 2014;312: 1473.

9. Zhao X, Tian L, Brackett A, et al. Classification and differential effectiveness of goal-directed hemodynamic therapies in surgical patients: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Crit Care. 2021;61:152−61.

10. Thacker JK, Mountford WK, Ernst FR, et al. Perioperative Fluid Utilization Variability and Association with Outcomes: Considerations for Enhanced Recovery Efforts in Sample US Surgical Populations. Ann Surg. 2016;263:502−10.

11. Miller TE, Roche AM, Gan TJ. Poor adoption of hemodynamic optimization during major surgery: are we practicing substandard care? Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1274−6.

12. Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, et al. FENICE Investigators; ESICM Trial Group. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1529−37. Erratum in: Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1737-8.

13. Malbouisson LMS, Silva Jr JM, Carmona MJC, et al. A pragmatic multi-center trial of goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:70.

14. Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Torn HM, et al. Intraoperative hypotension, and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:706−21.

15. Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, et al. INPRESS Study Group. Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1346−57.

16. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:e1063−143.

17. Bentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, et al. Will This Hemodynamically Unstable Patient Respond to a Bolus of Intravenous Fluids? JAMA. 2016;316:1298−309.

18. Benes J, Giglio M, Brienza N, et al. The effects of goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2014;18:584.

19. Michard F, Chemla D, Teboul JL. Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey? Crit Care. 2015;19:144.

20. Fellahi JL, Futier E, Vaisse C, et al. Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation-an experts’ opinion paper. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11:58.

21. Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, et al. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017;45: 415−21.

22. Kuiper AN, Trof RJ, Groeneveld AB. Mixed venous O2 saturation and fluid responsiveness after cardiac or major vascular surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:189.

23. Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in highrisk surgical patients. Chest. 2007;132:1817−24.

24. Lobo SM, Rezende E, Knibel MF, et al. Early determinants of death due to multiple organ failure after noncardiac surgery in high-risk patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:877−83.

25. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Schoonderbeek FJ, et al. LACTATE study group. Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:752−61.

26. Monnet X, Bataille A, Magalhaes E, et al. End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:93−100.

27. Habicher M, von Heymann C, Spies CD, et al. Central VenousArterial pCO2 Difference Identifies Microcirculatory Hypoperfusion in Cardiac Surgical Patients With Normal Central Venous Oxygen Saturation: A Retrospective Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29:646−55.

28. Prado L, Lobo F, de Oliveira N, et al. Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation - does it work? Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52:297−303.

29. H N LK, Tripathy S, Das PK. Central Venous-to-Arterial CO2 Difference-Assisted Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Management During Major Surgery-A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2022;134:1010−20.

30. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M, et al. Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness by changes in partial end-tidal CO2 pressure during a passive leg-raising maneuver. Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2:9.

31. Toupin F, Clairoux A, Deschamps A, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness with end-tidal carbon dioxide using a simplified passive leg raising maneuver: a prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2016;63:1033−41.

32. Huang H, Wu C, Shen Q, et al. Value of variation of end-tidal carbon dioxide for predicting fluid responsiveness during the passive leg raising test in patients with mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2022;26:20.

33. Shah P, Louis MA. Physiology, Central Venous Pressure 2022 Jul 15. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan−.

34. De Backer D, Vincent JL. Should we measure the central venous pressure to guide fluid management? Ten answers to 10 questions. Crit Care. 2018;22:43.

35. Leone M, Asfar P, Radermacher P, et al. Optimizing mean arterial pressure in septic shock: a critical reappraisal of the literature. Crit Care. 2015;19:101.

36. Malbrain ML, Marik PE, Witters I, et al. Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46:361−80.

37. Freitas MS, Nacul FE, Malbrain MLNG, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension, fluid balance, and adverse outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation. J Crit Care. 2021;62:271−5.

38. De Backer D, Bakker J, Cecconi M, et al. Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:730−41.

39. Silva-Jr JM, Menezes PFL, Lobo SM, et al. Impact of perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapies in surgical patients: economic study and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:71.